
The F5000 McLaren M25
#51
Posted 16 November 2008 - 21:07
The car looks very much like an M16 Indy car as you would expect being from that period. Aaron
Advertisement
#52
Posted 16 November 2008 - 21:16






#53
Posted 19 May 2009 - 17:40
#54
Posted 19 May 2009 - 18:22
As usual, you must be right. However, I remember that, in 1984 the magazine Grand Prrix International, published an interesting article about McLaren and its revival. According to the article, McLaren's revival should be attributed to Ron Dennis and John Barnard.
At the article there was a detailed recap of Barnard's career in which, among ather things, it was said that the M23 had mostly been designed by Barnard since, in 1973 Coppuck was too busy in the States to look after the formula 1 car. As Coppuck was the chief engineer, all projects used to bear his name.
The M23, was basically a M16 fitted with the suspensions of the M19 and adapted to the F1 specs. Barnard, also had assisted Coppuck in the project of the M16 so he was already familiar with it.
More or less the same can be can be said about the M24 which was the last McLaren model used at the USAC. This car derived from the M23 and it was mostly designed by John Baldwin, but also bearing Coppuck's name.
Finally, the M25 was another car based on the M23 and once again came out from Barnard's pen before he left the team. It is curious that, with Barnard no longer at McLaren, none of later Coppuck's models ( M26, M27-unconcluded-, M28 and M29 ) performed better than the M23 had done. In fact, it was not until Barnard's return than the team got back to the top. A coincidence ?
Gordon Coppuck designed the M23. I saw it with my own eyes.
He also designed the M16. The M23 was in no way a development of the M16, but it bears a relation in terms of being a wedge configuration with side mounted radiators. Constructionally there were significant differences, and the front suspension concepts (conventional top rocker on the M16 vs rising rate linkage on the M23) had nothing in common. JB was responsible for the later M16 developments, where he tidied up a lot of areas which had become unttidy as the car had developed through the years. This reminds me of the way in which Jean Claude Migeot's high nose concept introduced on the Tyrrell 019 is sometimes attributed to Mike Gascoyne, even though Gazza didn't join Tyrrell until way after the 019 was designed and built.
I have unbounded admiration and respect for John Barnard, (IMHO a fabulously gifted engineer) but little time for revisionist history.
#55
Posted 19 May 2009 - 19:24
In re-reading the Peter Revson Autobiography "Speed with Style" it refers to the many negotiations during 1973 between Revson and Teddy Mayer for Revson in '74 at McLaren. One such scenario had Revson describing a 1974 Racing program with McLaren with him focusing on Indy Racing and F5000 in the States.
I haven't read the book in question, but to suggest that Revson was being lined up to do F5000 and Indy in the States following his performances with McLaren in Formula One during 1973 are ridiculous, surely.
#56
Posted 19 May 2009 - 22:14
#57
Posted 20 May 2009 - 07:30
I agree that the thought of Mclaren having Revson doing F5000 and Indy after a great year in '73 sounds absolutely ridiculous, but yet on page 189 of his book "Speed with Style" Revson states " I told Larry Truesdale that with Teddy offering me Formula 5000 and USAC Racing all but telling me I was off the Formula 1 Team, he was trying to have his cake and eat it too. He would have Emerson and Marlboro Texaco which he needed , and he would have me in the United States where I would be helpful to him with his search for sponsors there. Also on pg 171 it states the program halted because of lack of funds. The rest of the book describes all of the negotiations between Revson & Mayer, all very interesting. And of course Revson had no intentions of leaving F1. Alas one wonders what could have transpired had he stayed at McLaren in '74.
Interesting. I wonder if the Yardley McLaren drive for 1974 was ever mentioned? Mike Hailwood got the drive of course.
#58
Posted 20 May 2009 - 07:36
#59
Posted 20 May 2009 - 08:14
I understand that the M25 is being re-converted back to an F1 car.
That was reported in one of the weekly rags, Ted. I can see why they are doing it, but as there was only ever one M25, personally, I find it a little sad...........

#61
Posted 20 May 2009 - 09:45
I haven't read the book in question, but to suggest that Revson was being lined up to do F5000 and Indy in the States following his performances with McLaren in Formula One during 1973 are ridiculous, surely.
I own this book, but only read half of it. It has to be the worst written biography ever.
#62
Posted 16 May 2013 - 22:11
#63
Posted 22 May 2013 - 23:52
#64
Posted 23 May 2013 - 00:00
#65
Posted 23 May 2013 - 10:35
More than likely you'll be 'fined' by this forum. Congrats...
So true...........

--------------------
フィネス
[The Artist formerly known as fines]
#66
Posted 06 June 2014 - 04:19
I've read many posts regarding this unique chassis, but I don't think anyone has posted a pic of it in it's original form. As all the threads are now archived, I thought I'd put it here in the hope that some folk are interested in seeing it...
I found this shot in Autosprint showing Bob Evans at Brands in a ShellSPORT Group 8 race in 1976, which I think was the car's race debut. It was turned out in McLaren orange, and somewhere I have a colour shot of it!
so hard to find an early pic of it
#68
Posted 06 June 2014 - 08:21
so hard to find an early pic of it
That is a BIG airbox!