
Williams/Cosworth - Not Such a Bad Choice?
#1
Posted 15 August 2005 - 12:54
- Cosworth probably have more V8 experience than any other manufacturer on the grid.
- They have one a championship in every decade since the 1960's.
- British engine supplier working with British Team - more likely to be on the same wavelength.
- Everyone will be more or less starting from scratch with their engines.
- Won't be just an engine supllier. Cosworth will play a part in research and development.
I think there's a possibility that this could be a surprise package in a season or two.
Advertisement
#2
Posted 15 August 2005 - 13:03
Then again: Williams-Toyota (-Lexus or whatever) for 2007, resigns them to B-Team status, at least partnering Cosworth they won't be perceived as someone's second string team.
#3
Posted 15 August 2005 - 13:10
Not sure how Cosworth (& Williams) can afford to keep up with the big boys for long.
#4
Posted 15 August 2005 - 13:17
I am not so sure that it is from a Williams perspective.
Apparently Williams are going to payfor the development of the engine but as this is a one year deal.
Why pay for developing an engine that you don't plan to use next year?
I want Williams up there and mixing it with Renault Mclaren and Ferrari.
#5
Posted 15 August 2005 - 13:24
The way they all talk it seems to have the potential to be extended if it works and if the engines are as good as they sound. Patrick Heads remarks especially seem to indicate the future could be with Cosworth... and TBH I'd love it.
I reckon Cossy CAN build a good, strong engine that can mix it with the big boys - and I reckon Williams could build a car to match. Imagine it - a non-manufacturer team with a non-manufacturer engine taking on, and hopefully beating, the big boys

#6
Posted 15 August 2005 - 13:26
#7
Posted 15 August 2005 - 13:31

There are characteristics specific to a V8 though - the vibrations and so forth - that may give Cosworth a bit of a head start in the short term.
Fingers crossed anyway!

#8
Posted 15 August 2005 - 13:32
But what i dont understand is that Williams might change to Toyota engine's after 2006, if they can get cosworth engine's and be their main team it doesnt seem that smart to change to Toyota and get 2nd rate engine's compared to Toyota.
#9
Posted 15 August 2005 - 13:46
reading the press release I was surprised to see that they are investing in the development of the engine and I think that this means that there is a possibility to extend the erlationship beyond 2006 ..which is just brilliant .


#10
Posted 15 August 2005 - 13:51
Also, Cossie may have been running their engine since April on a bench, but Honda, Toyota, and Ferrari have already tested their engines in a car, Cosworth has not.
Williams will have to adjust to a new partner for 06', and then prep for a new partner again in 07'. I don't see how this bit of instability will help Williams any.
#11
Posted 15 August 2005 - 14:27

delighted to see the return of williams to a agressive racing form!

#12
Posted 15 August 2005 - 14:35
Originally posted by Cindy
It's a 1 year stop-gap deal, no matter how they try to spin it.
Also, Cossie may have been running their engine since April on a bench, but Honda, Toyota, and Ferrari have already tested their engines in a car, Cosworth has not.
Williams will have to adjust to a new partner for 06', and then prep for a new partner again in 07'. I don't see how this bit of instability will help Williams any.
Unless 2007 is a "badge" instead of a switch... but if that was to be the case, it would probably start in 2006. The 2007 announcement will likely be a lot more fascinating.

jono
#13
Posted 15 August 2005 - 14:36
But there's a big questionmark on how much money Williams is going to get without a manufacturer. If they've enough anything's possible.
#14
Posted 15 August 2005 - 14:43
I hope they do really well though.
#15
Posted 15 August 2005 - 15:14
If GM would join in what would it make them? They have plenty of experience with V8s- Cosworth probably have more V8 experience than any other manufacturer on the grid.

Mercedes, Ferrari, Toyota and BMW would probably disagree since they have a good V8 engine repertoire in their range of production cars. I don't think they'd start from scratch thinking about how to build a V8 engine.- Everyone will be more or less starting from scratch with their engines.
This could backfire as well if it demands more resources than are available at Cosworth.- Won't be just an engine supllier. Cosworth will play a part in research and development.
What counts most imo is the availability of resources: budget, manpower, facilities. With the current state of the art in engine building, I don't think that successes from the sixties and seventies are something you can build on today.
Zoe
#16
Posted 15 August 2005 - 16:14
#17
Posted 15 August 2005 - 16:20
A total shock. They've never shown enough genuine interest to be in F1, and I don't see them doing so anytime in the near future, especially with the financial problems they're battling right now.Originally posted by Zoe
If GM would join in what would it make them?
Very true. However, I believe their Champ Car and IRL engine programs give them a bit of an edge over some of the other manufacturers who don't have a strong background of V8 racing engines. It probably won't be enough to push them to the front of the grid, but I think they'll hold their own against the might of the big manufacturers.With the current state of the art in engine building, I don't think that successes from the sixties and seventies are something you can build on today.
#18
Posted 15 August 2005 - 16:26
I agree, in fact I was extremely disappointed by the half-hearted attempt by GM to participate in LeMans with a Cadillac!Originally posted by Rob G
A total shock. They've never shown enough genuine interest to be in F1, and I don't see them doing so anytime in the near future, especially with the financial problems they're battling right now.
However my comment was in reply to the claim, that the decade-long experience Cosworth has with V8s would be a big advantage. If this would be indeed the case, then GM would win hands down simply due to their history with V8s. We all know that this is not the case ;)
Zoe
#19
Posted 15 August 2005 - 16:30
Originally posted by Gilles4Ever
The DFZ and DFR did not exactly set the world alight, so Cosworths V8 experience is not a guarantee of success.
No, they didn't, but the Zetec-R won the world championship.
Advertisement
#20
Posted 15 August 2005 - 17:27
quote:Originally posted by Zoe
If GM would join in what would it make them?
I don't think it would make them anything. Remember they bought engines from Cowsorth (Ford) and badged them as GM for the IRL series as there own engine wasn't up to the task. While they have a huge experience with V8, its mainly with low tech, low reving (comparitively) OHV type engines not the high tech screamers that is typical os a modern F1 power plant.
#21
Posted 15 August 2005 - 17:37
....However, the manufacturers learn fast, so for 2007, a deal with Toyota may indeed be the best option, as Cosworth's advantage over some of the others (I stress "some of the others" as I just can't see Cosworth being the class of the field, that sounds too good to be true, even though I'm full of optimism) will be eaten up by then.
#22
Posted 15 August 2005 - 17:37
#23
Posted 15 August 2005 - 17:42
*but they were caught relatively quickly, but that was to be expected, atleast to some extent. Afterall, the car manufacturers have a much bigger engine-budget.
#24
Posted 15 August 2005 - 17:48
I think there's no way Williams will stick with Cosworth long-term because of this commercial reality. Toyota are, apparently, willing to provide Williams engines for free somehow. I guess that will be a major factor, even if Cosworth prove competitive.
#25
Posted 15 August 2005 - 17:56

Toyota - if they offer free engines ....there must be a catch to it . I doubt that Toyota would do that for nothing in return ... :
#26
Posted 15 August 2005 - 17:57
Agreed. With the current state of play as well as the V8 engine rules I do not expect big differences between engine manufacturers. The area where I think Williams will be at a disadvantage is electronics as it will not be all under one roof. A lack of integrated chassis/engine/gearbox electronics. Last year Renault had a test car fully dedicated to testing a new integrated electronic system (Step 11).Originally posted by kNt
With all the restrictions I think engines are not very important anymore. You might be down a bit with a bad engine, but the cofg and other stuff is fixed so developping an engine shouldn't be that expensive.
But there's a big questionmark on how much money Williams is going to get without a manufacturer. If they've enough anything's possible.
BAR Honda now also seem to have a test car fully dedicated to a new electronic system for next year. I also remember Ralph Schumacher making a comment about Williams being behind on electronics when he saw what Toyota were doing. All this probably explains the involvement of Pi Electronics in not just engine control software.
However, the biggest difference can be made with the Aerodynamics and tyre usage (not with the engine IMO).
Who knows Williams will come out with a brilliant aero design, easy on tyres in 2007.

#27
Posted 15 August 2005 - 19:03

This is a great day for British motorsport. Let's hope they can pull something out of the bag next saeson and give Jenson a decent car to drive.
And here's something for you lucky-in-the-cricket-Aussies and MW.

#28
Posted 15 August 2005 - 19:17
#29
Posted 15 August 2005 - 19:28
Originally posted by bira
The thing is, Williams have a commercial reality to come to terms with. The Cosworth engines might be good, but they are not free. So for a long-term base, Williams need to come around that issue. They are not financially stable right now at all.
I think there's no way Williams will stick with Cosworth long-term because of this commercial reality. Toyota are, apparently, willing to provide Williams engines for free somehow. I guess that will be a major factor, even if Cosworth prove competitive.
IF the cosworth is a world champ engine... (who knows) then there is another commercial reality to balance against that, which is the flood of sponsorship options that might come from a championship winning british car/driver/engine combo, could be enough to make the difference not?
I dont really see it happening, but if it did it would be swimming pools full of cash for sir frank..
Shaun
#30
Posted 15 August 2005 - 19:35
#31
Posted 15 August 2005 - 19:39
#32
Posted 15 August 2005 - 20:24
Originally posted by roadie
Let's hope they can pull something out of the bag next saeson and give Jenson a decent car to drive.
So he can change his mind AGAIN and want to stay at Williams, then?
Cosworth beats having no engine at all. But without a major big sponsor coming on board, Williams has a few tough years ahead.
#33
Posted 15 August 2005 - 20:50
Originally posted by roadie
![]()
This is a great day for British motorsport. Let's hope they can pull something out of the bag next saeson and give Jenson a decent car to drive.
And here's something for you lucky-in-the-cricket-Aussies and MW.![]()
lol yeah we pulled ourselves outta the fire today......man you guys looked gutted comming off the field, where as we looked like we won the ashes

#34
Posted 15 August 2005 - 21:27
originally posted by kodandaram
The financial issue might well be sorted if somebody agrees to badge the engine and fund its development
What about Petronas as a sponser to badge the engines? I don't know that thay have a home now Sauber have been bought by BMW. I'm sure Red Bull are chasing that one but Williams are a big team so might have more to offer than RB?
#35
Posted 15 August 2005 - 21:30
#36
Posted 15 August 2005 - 23:53
As I understood Peter Sauber he's bussiness with the team as a councelar next year is mainly to keep relations with Petronas and Credit Suisse so I gues they'll steay with Sauber.Originally posted by CaptPugwash
What about Petronas as a sponser to badge the engines? I don't know that thay have a home now Sauber have been bought by BMW. I'm sure Red Bull are chasing that one but Williams are a big team so might have more to offer than RB?
#37
Posted 16 August 2005 - 01:01
#38
Posted 16 August 2005 - 02:08
#39
Posted 16 August 2005 - 02:12
Advertisement
#40
Posted 16 August 2005 - 03:47
Williams-Cosworth's ability to match the other teams will be more dependent on Williams building a decent car instead of Cosworth building a decent engine.
BTW, aren't Cosworth now an Australian-owned company?;)
#41
Posted 16 August 2005 - 05:01
Originally posted by Witt
Max's new engine rules were created specifically so that companies like Cosworth could maintain a presence in F1. With the dumbing down of the engine rules for next year, every engine will perform within the same range as the others.
Williams-Cosworth's ability to match the other teams will be more dependent on Williams building a decent car instead of Cosworth building a decent engine.
BTW, aren't Cosworth now an Australian-owned company?;)
cmon mate ...do you seriously beleive cosworth can do better than the other manufacturers ? Kalkhoven is not going to burn his own money to get cossie the funds they need ... if its going to succeed commercially ..its going to have to do it with its business porfits ...and in F1 ..they don't really have a great business for 2006 ...that is why they need a sponsor to pick up the development bills.
Having said all that it might well be that Cos enjoys an advantage in the new season ..but I am sure it won't last long. And yes - Williams will need to build a proper racing car which is quick from the outset .
#42
Posted 16 August 2005 - 16:47
Originally posted by FordFan
Engines are important, but they are so overrated by this board....There are tire issues as well, but a great engine doesn't make you a world beater.
Supposedly that's the line BMW used in the divorce.
"It's not you...it's us. Well, it's sorta you & not us...."

#43
Posted 17 August 2005 - 06:08
BMW and Williams co-developed the current gearbox they are running. The main case thin wall castings and the internals were actually manufactured with BMW technology in their Munich foundry. I am sure BMW will not handover their casting technology to Williams.
#44
Posted 17 August 2005 - 07:56
Pitpass article by Mike Lawrence
http://www.pitpass.c...es_art_id=25504
And now for a completely different view from the German AMuS:
http://www.auto-moto...worth.89114.htm
After some negotiating, Frank Williams has signed an engine supply deal with Cosworth for the coming season. The team owner wants a partnership for the the shortest possible duration and for the least amount of money.
It was considered common knowledge that Williams would leave BMW in 2006 and switch to Cosworth. But nothing was signed yet as Williams’ legal council checked if Williams would also lose sponsors if BMW was no longer a partner.
Now the partnership has been signed and sealed. “Cosworth is the world’s leading authority on (racing) V8 engines”, claims Williams. The once legendary engine company is just a temporary fix for Williams. The glory of Cosworth has long since faded. Cosworth has so little development money, it couldn’t even pre-finance the development of their V8 for next season. After the loss of Red Bull as partner, the company went looking for a new partner with the necessary cash.
13 million is too expensive for Williams
Frank Williams negotiated the price until the last moment. Cosworth’s price of 13 million Euro for an engine supply for just a season was too much in his eyes. Williams has been spoilt and is used to get factory engines free of charge. That goal has been targeted for 2007 again. Until then, Cosworth hopes to make a good impression in the Williams-chassis so other teams might be interested in the British V8.
Williams could have had BMW engines for 2006. But the boys from Munich insisted on a two-year deal, so the investment costs for the necessary 25-man strong customer department would be recovered.
#45
Posted 17 August 2005 - 09:12
#46
Posted 17 August 2005 - 12:23
#47
Posted 17 August 2005 - 12:40
Unfortunately the pitpass article is written by Mike Lawrence, who couldn't be considered a no-body....Both articles seem to be just some no-bodys opinion. Not exactly thoroughly researched, in depth journalism.
#48
Posted 17 August 2005 - 12:49
Originally posted by mark f1
originally posted by El Magnificante Unfortunately the pitpass article is written by Mike Lawrence, who couldn't be considered a no-body....
But Team BMW Sauber is going to do better than a third place, and Toyota are in fact much closer to winning races now then this time last year, no?

Williams-Cosworth will be very interesting. Hopefully it's a good idea for MW to not join Renault.