Jump to content


Photo

Why don't open wheeled cars have fenders?


  • Please log in to reply
31 replies to this topic

#1 jonovision_man

jonovision_man
  • Member

  • 651 posts
  • Joined: February 03

Posted 13 September 2005 - 22:24

An individual on another board I post to asked this question (TrackForum)... and I figured this is the best place to find the answer.

OK, let's dispense with the wise-cracks right now... :) Yes, of course they would no longer be "open wheel" cars if they had fenders... :)

But seriously, where did that originate, and is there a performance advantage? I can't see how, I would think adding a fender might get rid of some drag, although body work would add weight. :

jono

Advertisement

#2 McGuire

McGuire
  • Member

  • 9,218 posts
  • Joined: October 03

Posted 13 September 2005 - 22:52

It's strictly tradition. In the early days fenders and running boards were removed to reduce weight for speed contests, so it came to be that in the public mind, road cars had fenders and pure race cars did not.

Today we know there is nothing worse aerodynamically than a spinning tire and wheel hung out in the breeze, but the idea that pure race cars have exposed wheels remains. Fenders would make the cars both faster and safer but would kill the open wheel brand and image.

#3 Paul Ranson

Paul Ranson
  • Member

  • 199 posts
  • Joined: December 04

Posted 14 September 2005 - 00:15

It's interesting that in British Speed Hillclimbing where you can do pretty much anything the conventional 'single seater racing car' format rules the roost.

I would think that bodywork at the front that would significantly reduce drag would make it harder to achieve the necessary downforce, and perhaps by the time the air gets to the rear it makes little difference?

Paul

#4 Bill Sherwood

Bill Sherwood
  • Member

  • 444 posts
  • Joined: May 03

Posted 14 September 2005 - 02:57

A rotating tyre creates lift, (and so drag) so a mudguard over them would help in those areas.
But keeping the tyres down to temperature would then become more of a problem.

#5 Alaweni

Alaweni
  • Member

  • 212 posts
  • Joined: April 01

Posted 14 September 2005 - 13:27

Originally posted by Bill Sherwood
A rotating tyre creates lift, (and so drag) so a mudguard over them would help in those areas.
But keeping the tyres down to temperature would then become more of a problem.


What are those air vents/slates on the top of the fenders for cars like the Bentley or Audi R8? Is that to minimize the lift or to cool the tires?

#6 Bill Sherwood

Bill Sherwood
  • Member

  • 444 posts
  • Joined: May 03

Posted 14 September 2005 - 14:03

Originally posted by Alaweni


What are those air vents/slates on the top of the fenders for cars like the Bentley or Audi R8? Is that to minimize the lift or to cool the tires?


Yep, though for slightly different reasons - It dumps the air that build up under the guard and so any lift that's generated by that.

#7 wegmann

wegmann
  • Member

  • 784 posts
  • Joined: January 03

Posted 14 September 2005 - 15:42

If I'm not mistaken, the fenders in NASCAR (flared more in front than the back) somehow create downforce by taking advantage of the spinning wheel. As always, I'm not the aerodynamicist so I can't explain this.

#8 Engineguy

Engineguy
  • Member

  • 989 posts
  • Joined: February 01

Posted 14 September 2005 - 16:57

Originally posted by wegmann
If I'm not mistaken, the fenders in NASCAR (flared more in front than the back) somehow create downforce by taking advantage of the spinning wheel. As always, I'm not the aerodynamicist so I can't explain this.

I always figured the sheetmetal area in front of the wheel opening just acted as a subtle dive plane when they pull it outward at the bottom AND/OR it acted as a siphoned exhaust to pull a vacuum under the nose area.

#9 Monstrobolaxa

Monstrobolaxa
  • Member

  • 192 posts
  • Joined: April 04

Posted 14 September 2005 - 18:18

I read a few months ago that the FIA definition of Formula is: "car with wheels, suspension and driver in direct contact with the airflow" (something like this).

So a Formula car or open-wheeled car would be considered a prototype with fenders.

#10 Calorus

Calorus
  • Member

  • 4,062 posts
  • Joined: June 05

Posted 15 September 2005 - 11:50

What is a fender, is it a bumper or a wing (as in the part which covers a wheel, rather than an aerofoil)?

#11 Engineguy

Engineguy
  • Member

  • 989 posts
  • Joined: February 01

Posted 15 September 2005 - 15:37

Originally posted by Calorus
What is a fender, is it a bumper or a wing (as in the part which covers a wheel, rather than an aerofoil)?

Wing.

#12 Catalina Park

Catalina Park
  • Member

  • 6,890 posts
  • Joined: July 01

Posted 16 September 2005 - 09:48

Oh, you mean a mudguard! :p

#13 Pedro Rodriquez

Pedro Rodriquez
  • Member

  • 35 posts
  • Joined: July 05

Posted 19 September 2005 - 17:39

Originally posted by McGuire
It's strictly tradition. In the early days fenders and running boards were removed to reduce weight for speed contests, so it came to be that in the public mind, road cars had fenders and pure race cars did not.

Today we know there is nothing worse aerodynamically than a spinning tire and wheel hung out in the breeze, but the idea that pure race cars have exposed wheels remains. Fenders would make the cars both faster and safer but would kill the open wheel brand and image.


And they would have been ugly as well..;)

Posted Image

#14 desmo

desmo
  • Tech Forum Host

  • 32,120 posts
  • Joined: January 00

Posted 19 September 2005 - 18:17

That's actually the most flattering pic I've ever seen of that Cossie F1 4WD prototype...

#15 Pioneer

Pioneer
  • Member

  • 1,627 posts
  • Joined: January 01

Posted 19 September 2005 - 18:37

Thats an actual car? That looks like something I would have drawn on my Trapper Keeper when I was in middle high.

#16 DOHC

DOHC
  • Member

  • 12,405 posts
  • Joined: February 02

Posted 19 September 2005 - 19:46

Originally posted by desmo
That's actually the most flattering pic I've ever seen of that Cossie F1 4WD prototype...


:D Agreed. For a moment I even thought that it wasn't as square and boxy as I remembered it.

#17 jonovision_man

jonovision_man
  • Member

  • 651 posts
  • Joined: February 03

Posted 19 September 2005 - 22:33

Originally posted by McGuire
It's strictly tradition. In the early days fenders and running boards were removed to reduce weight for speed contests, so it came to be that in the public mind, road cars had fenders and pure race cars did not.

Today we know there is nothing worse aerodynamically than a spinning tire and wheel hung out in the breeze, but the idea that pure race cars have exposed wheels remains. Fenders would make the cars both faster and safer but would kill the open wheel brand and image.


Seems you hit it first try. :) Thanks.

jono

#18 McGuire

McGuire
  • Member

  • 9,218 posts
  • Joined: October 03

Posted 30 September 2005 - 23:26

Originally posted by Pedro Rodriquez


And they would have been ugly as well..;)


Not necessarily...in streamline version the M-B W196 is fairly rated one of the most beautiful F1 cars of all time, while the same car with the conventional OW bodywork is rather ordinary in appearance...maybe even homely. But Fangio et al preferred the OW version as they could see the front tires...also, the streamline car, while faster, had some terrifying habits at high speed. In the 1950's they hadn't yet learned the the key to automotive aerodynamics: the real goal is downforce, not minimal drag.


Posted Image

Posted Image

#19 McGuire

McGuire
  • Member

  • 9,218 posts
  • Joined: October 03

Posted 30 September 2005 - 23:31

another early attempt at full bodywork from about the same time, this one the Sumar Special at Indianapolis. By the time they got it handling properly, it looked like photo #2:

Posted Image
Posted Image

Advertisement

#20 McGuire

McGuire
  • Member

  • 9,218 posts
  • Joined: October 03

Posted 30 September 2005 - 23:40

Another of the beautiful streamliners from the proto-era of aerodynamics, the Vanwall. I believe Frank Costin had a part in this one. Isn't it interesting how sensual and amorphous are all these shapes... vaguely marine and feminine at the same time?

Posted Image

#21 desmo

desmo
  • Tech Forum Host

  • 32,120 posts
  • Joined: January 00

Posted 01 October 2005 - 00:35

The "mystique" of pure open wheelers is sort of lost on me, that W196 with the envelope body is sex on wheels compared to the "pure" version. The forms for those pre-downforce cars are very feminine and marine like nothing since. I always liked the Auto-Union streamliners:

http://www.audi.it/w...alta/stream.jpg

#22 DOHC

DOHC
  • Member

  • 12,405 posts
  • Joined: February 02

Posted 03 October 2005 - 08:36

Originally posted by desmo
http://www.audi.it/w...alta/stream.jpg


Definitely cooler than taking the skateboard for a spin in that ramp. :D

#23 McGuire

McGuire
  • Member

  • 9,218 posts
  • Joined: October 03

Posted 03 October 2005 - 15:49

Of course, converting open wheel formula cars into full-fendered "sports cars" is a sort of American tradition, dating back at the very least to the Zerex Special of that dirty cheating bastard Roger Penske. (Just kidding.)

Here is among the latest along these lines, Arnie Loyning's Swift-Viking. (Fat Boy will enjoy this.) This deal is essentially full-envelope bodywork with a Swift DB4 stuck inside... as the photo shows, you don't even need a full paint job to finish it off; just add some nice contrasting color. :D

This thing is an absolute rocket ship and will murder a Radical or other "true" sports racing car. Last year 18-year old Tony Loniewski won the SCCA Runoffs in CSR with this car, and this year Arnie himself (about 300 years old I think) won the same title with the exact same chassis I believe. The other thing this unit managed to do was drive up the market value of old DB4 chassis by a zillion percent.

Posted Image

#24 McGuire

McGuire
  • Member

  • 9,218 posts
  • Joined: October 03

Posted 03 October 2005 - 15:59

Continuing the theme, here is Jacek Mucha's similar deal, another formula-car based C sports racer but this one built around a Ralt RT41-Mazda. It's pretty damn fast too.

Posted Image

#25 shaun979

shaun979
  • Member

  • 417 posts
  • Joined: July 04

Posted 03 October 2005 - 23:38

Originally posted by McGuire
This thing is an absolute rocket ship and will murder a Radical or other "true" sports racing car.


McGuire, what makes it so quick? TIA

#26 McGuire

McGuire
  • Member

  • 9,218 posts
  • Joined: October 03

Posted 04 October 2005 - 09:44

Originally posted by shaun979


McGuire, what makes it so quick? TIA


Well lots of things I guess. First it is Arnie Loyning's, who is a wizard with cars and engines like these. Then, the Swift was originally built for a professional (more or less) OW racing series, but here it is competing against backyard sports racing specials and track day cars. And it is a formula car with central driver and fuel tank, thinly disguised as a sports car.

#27 petefenelon

petefenelon
  • Member

  • 4,815 posts
  • Joined: August 02

Posted 05 October 2005 - 12:40

Originally posted by McGuire
[B]Of course, converting open wheel formula cars into full-fendered "sports cars" is a sort of American tradition, dating back at the very least to the Zerex Special of that dirty cheating bastard Roger Penske. (Just kidding.)

Not just an American one.;) -- Look at some of the monstrosities that used to race in the Interserie in central Europe!

#28 McGuire

McGuire
  • Member

  • 9,218 posts
  • Joined: October 03

Posted 06 October 2005 - 03:15

Speaking of the Zerex Special, here it is...with a young Roger Penske behind the wheel, exhibiting a rather sheepish cat-eating-canary expression, as if hoping no one noticed he has taken a Cooper T53 F1 car, stuck some full-width body panels on it and is calling it a "sports car." The first demonstration of the Unfair Advantage, I suppose.
Posted Image
But then a howl rose up and he was forced to cut it up in the middle and make up a full-width cockpit, so then it looked like this:
Posted Image

#29 McGuire

McGuire
  • Member

  • 9,218 posts
  • Joined: October 03

Posted 06 October 2005 - 03:24

Then you have the Can Am revival aka the "single-seater" Can Am, in which the sanctioning body actually provided for converting F5000 cars into full-bodied deals in hopes of recreating the glory days of the original Can Am. Didn't quite happen

This is one of the better-sorted ones, the March 817, which was a conversion of the March 81C Indy car (but using a SB Chevy instead of a Cosworth) which was an adaptation of the March 811 F1 chassis, which was a more or less blatant knockoff of the Williams.

Posted Image

Here is one of the more interesting looking cars from the single-seater Can Am era, the Schkee...

Posted Image

#30 desmo

desmo
  • Tech Forum Host

  • 32,120 posts
  • Joined: January 00

Posted 06 October 2005 - 06:31

Damn, I'd almost forgot that last one. I wonder if Formula Libre will ever be seen again? There's really nothing else like it.

#31 jimclark

jimclark
  • Member

  • 169 posts
  • Joined: March 00

Posted 20 October 2005 - 23:15

I note on the entry list that there will be a Schkee at the vintage gathering this coming weekend at Road Atlanta...wish I could make it. ): ): ):

http://www.svra.com/...eb/EJEN-675NDU/$file/Entry+List+-+Road+Atlanta+Season+Finale.pdf?OpenElement

#32 Wolf

Wolf
  • Member

  • 7,883 posts
  • Joined: June 00

Posted 21 October 2005 - 00:07

Originally posted by McGuire


Not necessarily...in streamline version the M-B W196 is fairly rated one of the most beautiful F1 cars of all time, while the same car with the conventional OW bodywork is rather ordinary in appearance...maybe even homely. But Fangio et al preferred the OW version as they could see the front tires...also, the streamline car, while faster, had some terrifying habits at high speed. In the 1950's they hadn't yet learned the the key to automotive aerodynamics: the real goal is downforce, not minimal drag. [/URL]


Actually they did have a clue about wings in '50ies... Related to this Mercedes picture- their Le Mans cars were equipped with air-brakes and Moss found out that keeping it 'extended out' a bit helped the traction through corners so he used it like that.

Another fine example is Swiss Michael May (drove in GPs as well) who equipped his Porsche with a proper centrally mounted wing for Nurburgring 1000km in '56. Opponents got it banned afer the practice (on safety grounds), and Porsche swiftly employed him*. Later on he worked Ferrari (I think he might've has been involved with engine for '61 Sharknose), and IIRC quite recently has been involved in som way with Jaguar.

Pic of this car: http://8w.forix.com/may/mm-ring56.jpg . A bit more info on 8W: http://8w.forix.com/may.html .