
Top F1 driver repeatedly turns down David Letterman show
#1
Posted 22 September 2005 - 09:52
"A top Formula One driver has had an open invitation to be on 'The Late Show with David Letterman' show for the past three years. That driver will not do the interview."
Any ideas who? First guess would be Schumacher, obviously. Pure speculation, perhaps, but can anyone familair with the David Letterman show suggest any reasons why an F1 driver might steer clear? And how should F1 promote itself better in America after this year's notorious farce?
Advertisement
#2
Posted 22 September 2005 - 09:57
No question that he is talking about Schumacher.
#3
Posted 22 September 2005 - 09:58
Coulthard's been on it a few times hasn't he? So has Montoya, and if I'm not mistaken Webber too.
Anyone got a list of who's done it?
And I have to say I like David Letterman, American Talk-Shows aren't really my thing, but he always comes across as pretty genuine, and he's obviously a huge F1 fan to boot.
#4
Posted 22 September 2005 - 10:44
#5
Posted 22 September 2005 - 10:49
#6
Posted 22 September 2005 - 11:00
Originally posted by karlth
Montoya has several times been on Letterman's show and Coulthard was there once as well.
No question that he is talking about Schumacher.
I saw the Coulthard one, he was very funny. But Letterman's just one of those interchangeable insincere American talkshow hosts and I can't really blame most drivers for wishing to avoid him.
#7
Posted 22 September 2005 - 11:07
#8
Posted 22 September 2005 - 11:16
If he starts appearing on US talk shows he can say goodbye to his much-cherished anonimity in the USA.
RDM
(M$ Rebuttal Unit)
#9
Posted 22 September 2005 - 11:43
#10
Posted 22 September 2005 - 11:46
#11
Posted 22 September 2005 - 11:49
Originally posted by BorderReiver
Well, I think we can certainly rule out a few people, mainly those who've been on the show.
Coulthard's been on it a few times hasn't he? So has Montoya, and if I'm not mistaken Webber too.
Anyone got a list of who's done it?
jv's been on a few times too.
#12
Posted 22 September 2005 - 11:59
#13
Posted 22 September 2005 - 12:15
Originally posted by The Soul Stealer
Given the German sense of humour (or lack there of) I imagine the prospect of appearing on the Letterman show must be horrifying...
It's just sad to read such generalized nonsense. Maybe Schumacher lacks a sense of humour, I don't know, but I have met many Germans with a great sense of humour, quirky even. One of my best friends, who also happens to be German is one of the funniest people I have ever met, he can enjoy a good laugh better than anyone I know, and I happen to have friends from every corner of the world.
Cooper
#14
Posted 22 September 2005 - 12:15
Originally posted by RDM
If if he IS referring to M$, a logical reason for M$'s refusal would be this. He has said, on several occassions, that in the US he is not recognised, and can walk down the street without being hassled by fans, which is a rare thing for him, and something he really enjoys.
If he starts appearing on US talk shows he can say goodbye to his much-cherished anonimity in the USA.
RDM
(M$ Rebuttal Unit)
shittt exactly what i was about to suggest
#15
Posted 22 September 2005 - 12:19
Originally posted by F1Fanatic.co.uk
"A top Formula One driver has had an open invitation to be on 'The Late Show with David Letterman' show for the past three years. That driver will not do the interview."
Can't be Schumacher, otherwise it would have been "The top"

#16
Posted 22 September 2005 - 12:37
#17
Posted 22 September 2005 - 12:46
Originally posted by Tubbs
IMO If asked MS should give something back to the sport that has given him so much.
Give back to the rich man's sport that is F1? Maybe he should give a percentage to Ron Dennis, he seems to need it

Schumacher should give back to the society that enabled him to reach his dreams, which was never the F1 circus. F1 is a spoiled mans domain, and it seems to me certain fans have trouble putting things in perspective. He should give to the poor and the less priviledged. I seem to recall he does do just that.
He has made it in F1 because he has made others richer as well, F1 was never a charity organisation.
Cooper
#18
Posted 22 September 2005 - 12:56
Cooper
#19
Posted 22 September 2005 - 12:57
Advertisement
#20
Posted 22 September 2005 - 13:23
Anyway, Michael Schumacher has every right to decline a guest role on Letterman if he so chooses. I get an allergic reaction every time someone suggests a sports star should give something back to the sport, or better yet, the fans who apparently have, by some fantastic mechanism I'm too stupid to fully understand, actually made that star into what (s)he is today. Just because I buy the occasional F1 Racing or a piece of over-priced, fashionistas-wouldn't-be-seen-dead-in official teamwear doesn't mean the teams, drivers etc. are somehow indebted to me.
#21
Posted 22 September 2005 - 13:29
#22
Posted 22 September 2005 - 13:32
Originally posted by MiPe
His $- millions he gave to childern's fund, nature disaster victims like recently to US, and also some other hand-outs from the past don't count?
How much others, like JV or JPM gave anything to anyone? Maybe they gave, I am not sure, but to pick up on Schumacher is really not of a good taste.
jv and his charity organise events to raise money every winter...;)
#23
Posted 22 September 2005 - 13:41
Originally posted by DaleCooper
I would also like to add that the worst thing that could happen to F1 is it becoming more popular in America. If you are a purist of sport, then F1 has (almost) no place in the center of FAKE SPORTS. I don't mean to insult all the great fans F1 has in America, which are surely some of the best fans F1 has, but if F1 became mainstream, it would have to be WHORED out to the masses much like the other sports have been, and to a majority public that doesn't understand the subtleties of F1, that would only mean the dumbing down of the sport, all for the sake of the show, that I wouldn't have any appetite for. Marketing to the masses (especially in America) is to me an exercise in stupidity, all in the interests of obtaining one thing: more money. That won't improve the sport.
Cooper
Ouch! I see you drank a tall glass of bitch juice this morning.;)
#24
Posted 22 September 2005 - 13:47
Originally posted by DaleCooper
I would also like to add that the worst thing that could happen to F1 is it becoming more popular in America. If you are a purist of sport, then F1 has (almost) no place in the center of FAKE SPORTS. I don't mean to insult all the great fans F1 has in America, which are surely some of the best fans F1 has, but if F1 became mainstream, it would have to be WHORED out to the masses much like the other sports have been, and to a majority public that doesn't understand the subtleties of F1, that would only mean the dumbing down of the sport, all for the sake of the show, that I wouldn't have any appetite for. Marketing to the masses (especially in America) is to me an exercise in stupidity, all in the interests of obtaining one thing: more money. That won't improve the sport.
Cooper
i think he should do whatever it is he wants to do with his life. goes the same for regular people who dont make millions.
not conform to other peoples ideas of what life should be and what is appropriate behavioue.
#25
Posted 22 September 2005 - 13:50
#26
Posted 22 September 2005 - 13:53

#27
Posted 22 September 2005 - 14:05
Originally posted by MiPe
His $- millions he gave to childern's fund, nature disaster victims like recently to US, and also some other hand-outs from the past don't count?
How much others, like JV or JPM gave anything to anyone? Maybe they gave, I am not sure, but to pick up on Schumacher is really not of a good taste.
I suspect you may have missed the "I seem to recall he does do just that" from Cooper's post.
#28
Posted 22 September 2005 - 14:12
To quote someone I know, "It's just sad to read such generalized nonsense". As if, anyway, the work of Bernard Ecclestone and his bunch of friends (they all americans, now?) wasn't a work of dumbing down the sport for the sake of money.Originally posted by DaleCooper
I would also like to add that the worst thing that could happen to F1 is it becoming more popular in America. If you are a purist of sport, then F1 has (almost) no place in the center of FAKE SPORTS. I don't mean to insult all the great fans F1 has in America, which are surely some of the best fans F1 has, but if F1 became mainstream, it would have to be WHORED out to the masses much like the other sports have been, and to a majority public that doesn't understand the subtleties of F1, that would only mean the dumbing down of the sport, all for the sake of the show, that I wouldn't have any appetite for. Marketing to the masses (especially in America) is to me an exercise in stupidity, all in the interests of obtaining one thing: more money. That won't improve the sport.
#29
Posted 22 September 2005 - 14:18
#30
Posted 22 September 2005 - 14:19

#31
Posted 22 September 2005 - 14:28
Oh get over yourself.Originally posted by DaleCooper
I would also like to add that the worst thing that could happen to F1 is it becoming more popular in America. If you are a purist of sport, then F1 has (almost) no place in the center of FAKE SPORTS. I don't mean to insult all the great fans F1 has in America, which are surely some of the best fans F1 has, but if F1 became mainstream, it would have to be WHORED out to the masses much like the other sports have been, and to a majority public that doesn't understand the subtleties of F1, that would only mean the dumbing down of the sport, all for the sake of the show, that I wouldn't have any appetite for. Marketing to the masses (especially in America) is to me an exercise in stupidity, all in the interests of obtaining one thing: more money. That won't improve the sport.
Cooper

#32
Posted 22 September 2005 - 14:29
Absolutely agree.Originally posted by kismet
Anyway, Michael Schumacher has every right to decline a guest role on Letterman if he so chooses. I get an allergic reaction every time someone suggests a sports star should give something back to the sport, or better yet, the fans who apparently have, by some fantastic mechanism I'm too stupid to fully understand, actually made that star into what (s)he is today. Just because I buy the occasional F1 Racing or a piece of over-priced, fashionistas-wouldn't-be-seen-dead-in official teamwear doesn't mean the teams, drivers etc. are somehow indebted to me.

#33
Posted 22 September 2005 - 14:34
Michael can refuse if he wants too, he will have good reasons for it and you guys just need to accept that.
#34
Posted 22 September 2005 - 14:36
Originally posted by MiPe
If I would be in Michael' shoes, and late night talk show host invited me, I would be rather as well careful to accept such invitation. Michael has nothing to gain, because he might be ridiculed, accused without cause, justification or apology, and generally treated in disrespectful manner. I would say that he is controlling any exposure to risk admirably.
Indeed, the problem with those shows is that they are live broadcasts with hosts who do not allow the guest to outshow him or not to obey to maybe difficult questions. I can imagine Michael is careful about that. The rules of the game are a little different in the US than in Europe. In Europe those things are much more voluntary than in the US, where people expect the stars to show up and promote. I think the truth is in the middle. Drivers do have a responsibility towards the sport and towards the fans, however they are not public property either and should be free to select what appeals to them most.
#35
Posted 22 September 2005 - 14:38
Could be that Kimi doesn't want to be asked about his antics....
They would be much more interesting for Letterman....

#36
Posted 22 September 2005 - 14:42
#37
Posted 22 September 2005 - 14:43
Originally posted by metz
Could be that Kimi doesn't want to be asked about his antics....
They would be much more interesting for Letterman....![]()
Just imagine how verbose Kimi would be in Letterman's show!

"Errr... well, I... hmm"
Maybe if they gave him a couple vodka shots before the show he would be a little bit more relaxed...
#38
Posted 22 September 2005 - 14:48
#39
Posted 22 September 2005 - 14:49
Originally posted by vaavu
Maybe if they gave him a couple vodka shots before the show he would be a little bit more relaxed...
The American public aren't ready for "Mr. Winky"

Advertisement
#40
Posted 22 September 2005 - 14:54
Oh, when JV was on a few years ago, he raced a cabbie around the block, both of 'em driving the big American sedans. Pretty entertaining. JV looked like he was about ready to trade paint and drive on sidewalks to win.
By the way, no, the show is not live in the USA.
As people have noted, Letterman is a huge racing fan (from Indiana and adored the 500, etc., since he was a kid, has been seen jogging in a Senna t-shirt) and he's very astute. He's done scads of good interviews with racers. My feelings about the show are mixed, but I make sure to watch when he has a racer on because I know it will be a really good interview.
#41
Posted 22 September 2005 - 15:16
Originally posted by DaleCooper
Give back to the rich man's sport that is F1? Maybe he should give a percentage to Ron Dennis, he seems to need it![]()
Schumacher should give back to the society that enabled him to reach his dreams, which was never the F1 circus. F1 is a spoiled mans domain, and it seems to me certain fans have trouble putting things in perspective. He should give to the poor and the less priviledged. I seem to recall he does do just that.
He has made it in F1 because he has made others richer as well, F1 was never a charity organisation.
Cooper
This isn't about money or charity at all but you knew that (hopefully!).

#42
Posted 22 September 2005 - 16:05
Originally posted by DaleCooper
It's just sad to read such generalized nonsense. Maybe Schumacher lacks a sense of humour, I don't know, but I have met many Germans with a great sense of humour, quirky even. One of my best friends, who also happens to be German is one of the funniest people I have ever met, he can enjoy a good laugh better than anyone I know, and I happen to have friends from every corner of the world.
Cooper
Given your inept ability to spot something remotely resembling humour I find it hard to accept your character analysis of anyone who can "enjoy a good laugh"
Then again, seen as how your friend is German, you may actually be you are agreeing with my previous statement!


#43
Posted 22 September 2005 - 16:31
Originally posted by Tubbs
This isn't about money or charity at all but you knew that (hopefully!).MS is statistically the most successful F1 driver of all time and he should be ready to give an hour of his precious time to promoting F1 and not act like a filthy rich spoiled baby.
You're right. I'm sure that's exactly what all the children Michael has helped over the years call him-a rich, spoiled baby.;) Please think before you post ****. Michael has spent more time helping people in one year than you've probably done in your entire life and here you are griping about 1 ****ing show. Unbelievable!
#44
Posted 22 September 2005 - 16:34
Originally posted by Gareth
I suspect you may have missed the "I seem to recall he does do just that" from Cooper's post.

#45
Posted 22 September 2005 - 17:10
ยดOriginally posted by tombr
I remember Irvine being on Letterman several years ago. He started telling a joke about someone in a bar asking if anyone had any Irish in them. Irvine got as far as a woman in the back of the bar speaking up and then backed off without finishing the joke.
In that situation - that IS the end of the joke

#46
Posted 22 September 2005 - 17:29
Originally posted by RDM
If if he IS referring to M$, a logical reason for M$'s refusal would be this. He has said, on several occassions, that in the US he is not recognised, and can walk down the street without being hassled by fans, which is a rare thing for him, and something he really enjoys.
If he starts appearing on US talk shows he can say goodbye to his much-cherished anonimity in the USA.
RDM
(M$ Rebuttal Unit)
Average american watching letterman:
Voice over: 'Next up 7 time world champ Micheal Schumacher"
Average American: "Not Gordon or Dale Jr, why have I not seen this guy?"
Show returns, Dave introduces Schumacher
Average American: "How can he be a racing driver, he's German or something...What else is on" Clicks to 18th running of that days ESPN Sportscenter
He could go on Leno, Letterman and all the other talk shows and unless he did something outrageous would not be remembered
sad but true state of where F1 is on the average Americans radar
#47
Posted 22 September 2005 - 17:39
The guy is a walking cigarette advertising.
Tony Stewart from Nascar was there these days and Letterman made the bulk of work to make the conversation interesting.
Dave is experienced and carries the guest even if he is not interesting.
But his interviews with Montoya are boring. He just keep calling JPM 'Zorro'.
#48
Posted 22 September 2005 - 17:44
Originally posted by F1 Tor.
You're right. I'm sure that's exactly what all the children Michael has helped over the years call him-a rich, spoiled baby.;) Please think before you post ****. Michael has spent more time helping people in one year than you've probably done in your entire life and here you are griping about 1 ****ing show. Unbelievable!
Ah get off yer high horse.

#49
Posted 22 September 2005 - 17:49
If he starts appearing on US talk shows he can say goodbye to his much-cherished anonimity in the USA.
I think you're bang on.
If I was MS I would like to keep my anonimity in the USA also.
It must be great for him and his family to be able to have a real holiday without constantly being confronted by fans wanting an autograph or a question answered.
#50
Posted 22 September 2005 - 18:06
If I was Schumacher I wouldn't go on it, Michael is way too busy.