Originally posted by xype
Ok, let's try it this way;
Imagine you work at a big ass company. Like IBM. You find out that they will be cutting some 10,000 jobs and that you were one of the most likely candidates to go. Which behaviour from said company would be more honourable and respectful towards you:
1) Your "Boss" inviting you for a talk, saying how bad the economy is, blah, blah, you got the boot, you have two-three days to pick up all your stuff and hand over the door key card. And good luck with finding a new job.
or
2) You go to work one day, try to get trough the door and your key-card isn't working. You ask the security guard what's going on and he says "I guess you were fired, Bob. You stuff is probably back in the dumpster along with the rest."
So which one would make you feel like the company at least had some minimal respect for you left and treated you as a human being even if it was bad news they had for you? I don't think argumenting with "But he did a bad job anyway!" really excuses how BAR handled the situation.
Well considering Sato had been given over a month's notice of the likelyhood that the best he could hope for was a third driver position, especially if Button was staying, and that he was a contractor anyway, I don't think either scenario really sums up the situation very well. All indications are that BAR are happy to keep Sato on as third driver. Given his performance for the last two years, he should be grateful to take it and hope to improve and impress, or risk relying on Japanese commercial interests finding him a drive at a Japanese powered team further down the grid.....
Regarding your IBM analogy, having worked within IBM, I've seen some pretty shitty treatment of contractors and some very sudden announcements of full IBM employess being 'sold' with division sell-offs.