
Marc Surer
#1
Posted 05 November 2005 - 14:40
Advertisement
#2
Posted 05 November 2005 - 14:56

I had a long chat with him at the 1st Detroit GP and he was without doubt the nicest F1 driver I have ever met. If he had a problem, perhaps it was because he was too nice. For example, at the same GP, I found Pironi to be a real self-centered plotting little politican, Prost simply just arrogant, i.e. he told me basically that his car crashed itself at Monaco that year!
At the time, IMO, F1 Managers were looking for ruthless bastards who would do anything to win, ANYTHING!

He definitely had the talent.
#3
Posted 05 November 2005 - 15:04
#4
Posted 05 November 2005 - 16:01
my tought is: A champion defeated only by bad luck.
If I am not wrong in his second accident at Kyalami, he has the plates and the screws in the legs
in order to recover from the previous incident...............terrible even to think about it.
But everytime he come back, and like David underline, a nice person, I've never noticed in his rare interviews a change in his attitude, and his accidents were more than enough to change the character of a person.
Then he goes to the rallies, and also here very fast very good rallyman, until that other terrible shunt. Like F1steveuk put in evidence, he was really fast, with everything.
He really has some credits with lady luck.
A lot of admiration to him. I dont know how many drivers could substain his adversities.
MonzaDriver.
#5
Posted 05 November 2005 - 16:09
#6
Posted 05 November 2005 - 18:50
Surer had quite a bit of help from BMW during his career, which helped him to the F2 title in 1979 in a horrible car. His 1977 season in the BMW junior team was pretty wild, he was even suspended for dangerous driving.
The 1980 ATS was quite a good car (remember Lammers' 4th on the grid at Long Beach), but often clumsy prepared.
#7
Posted 05 November 2005 - 19:03
Originally posted by Frank de Jong
I think Surer was quite a decent driver but not a super talent IMHO - he spent quite a few years in FV, F3, turing cars and F2 before getting a chance in F1.
Surer had quite a bit of help from BMW during his career, which helped him to the F2 title in 1979 in a horrible car. His 1977 season in the BMW junior team was pretty wild, he was even suspended for dangerous driving.
The 1980 ATS was quite a good car (remember Lammers' 4th on the grid at Long Beach), but often clumsy prepared.
He spent many years in the lower formulae and touring cars because he didn't have any massive sponsors behind him. You said yourself that the car he won the '79 F2 Championship with was awful, yet he won with it at the Nurburgring - quite early in it's development.
I remember looking forward to '84 because it looked like he might get a decent car at last, with BMW power - and the A6 had looked pretty decent. As soon as I saw the A7.... well, what can you say.
I'd say his comebacks from the injuries he suffered, his sometimes incredible performances, marked him out as something pretty special.One of those times when you wonder whether the F1 team bosses actually knew what they were watching,or if they had a clue.
#8
Posted 05 November 2005 - 21:32
A "true" number one Grand Prix driver in a top team? No.
But close, certainly (IMHO).
#9
Posted 05 November 2005 - 21:35
#10
Posted 05 November 2005 - 22:05

#11
Posted 07 November 2005 - 05:48
#14
Posted 10 November 2005 - 00:18
#15
Posted 10 November 2005 - 14:00
As has been said here before, there aren't too many drivers who come back from the injuries he received seemingly undimmed by the experience. Again, he's one of those drivers I always had the impression was a 'good guy', and that seems to have been confirmed by those that have met him. I'd love to have seen what he could have achieved with a competitive car over a decent period of time.
#16
Posted 10 November 2005 - 15:02
In any case, he was certainly far more talented than many of the donkeys that we have had to tolerate in F1 over the last 20 years or so (where Bourdais?).
Edward
#17
Posted 11 November 2005 - 21:41
#18
Posted 19 November 2005 - 12:15

#19
Posted 19 November 2005 - 12:41
Originally posted by KWSN - DSM
I always liked him, and despised Warwick for punting hif of a certain podium in Monaco (1983 - 1984??). Likely the Heidfeld of his era.
![]()
That's probably a very good comparison. Totally under-rated and over-looked.
Advertisement
#20
Posted 19 November 2005 - 13:17
Agree about Bourdais. But where are the donkeys? - depends on what they are driving.Originally posted by SEdward
I was always impressed by Marc Surer. He stood out from the rest in F2 and occasionally shone in F1.
In any case, he was certainly far more talented than many of the donkeys that we have had to tolerate in F1 over the last 20 years or so (where Bourdais?).
Edward
I remember a conversation between a hack who'd arrived late at Brands Hatch for a practice, and DSJ many years ago:
Hack: "Who's quick?"
DSJ: "They all are."
As for Surer, he was disqualified for punting a rival off at the Nurburgring in F2. He was adamant that he had not done so. Confronted with video evidence, he replied "I didn't know the event was televised."
Nice guy all the same.
#21
Posted 17 October 2009 - 17:11
#22
Posted 17 October 2009 - 20:00