
Do commercials interrupt the race broadcast in your country ?
#1
Posted 22 August 2000 - 05:37
They do NOT describe the race but usually start commenting on F1 rumors after the 5th lap or so. Both feeds too frequently interrupt broadcasts from 60 to 90 secs for adverts.
Earlier this year TSN used to cut the audio and keep a small image of the race while the ads were aired. But no more. So we Canadians are witness to the ONLY live sports broadcast in the country to be TOTALLY interrupted by commercials. The TSN/RDS network made something like 55 million $$$ in profits last year so they could afford to give us the ENTIRE race ? But nooooo... Why they do not use the Soccer broadcast method is beyond my comprehen$ion.
How is it in your part of the world ?
Advertisement
#2
Posted 22 August 2000 - 05:39
Antti
#3
Posted 22 August 2000 - 07:42
#4
Posted 22 August 2000 - 07:50
Murray or Martin always anounce when one is coming up, so you should be able to tell whether you are "in sync" with us or whether you get some unannounced breaks as well.
BTW there is a little square in the top right corner (black & white lines scrolling) when a break is due, but it can run for a minute or two if something exciting is happening.
#5
Posted 22 August 2000 - 10:16
It's a cue for all the ITV regions to roll their own commercial breaks.
#6
Posted 22 August 2000 - 10:24
#7
Posted 22 August 2000 - 10:29
#8
Posted 22 August 2000 - 12:15
I had to put up with TSN for 4 years. I found it strange to have breaks during the race, but then I´d just switch to RDS once TSN went to commercials and then back again after a minute or so.
#9
Posted 22 August 2000 - 12:18
#10
Posted 22 August 2000 - 12:27
#11
Posted 22 August 2000 - 12:32
No, we do not get your commercials, but believe me, they would be a welcom respite from the ones TSN shows here. I think that there are perhaps 4 or 5 commercials that are played during an F1 race. Yes... 4 or 5 that are continuous recycled during the race, occasionally even showing back to back with themselves.
The ones that are normally shown are 1) Suzuki Grand Vitara 2) Air Canada Champagne Spray 3) Air Canada Lollipop shot (5 sec interlude) 4) Air Canada start lights (5 sec interlude) 5) Mercedes Benz slingshot. There are a couple of others perhaps that I am overlooking but that's the extent of the commercials. It's no Superbowl.

KinetiK
#12
Posted 22 August 2000 - 12:35
F1 should take a cue from world soccer and only have commercials during non-race times, e.g. pre/post race, restarts, etc. They can always use picture in picture technology to splash an ad on the screen while allowing us to still view the race...
#13
Posted 22 August 2000 - 12:52
Unless the times when we have a big soccer game. the people of Globo TV interrupts the race to show flashes of... a bus taking the team to the field, them the players getting down the bus...
In fact, they did that in one of the last Piquet victories at Benetton. We didn't saw his last laps, only a small flash of the podium.
But yet, at least it's not interrupted by breaks. All in all, I guess it's way above average
#14
Posted 22 August 2000 - 12:54
#15
Posted 22 August 2000 - 13:27
Don't you people have the opportunity to catch F1 coverage from foreign channels? No two channels interrupt at the same time. This method has worked perfectly for me.
#16
Posted 22 August 2000 - 13:45
Looks like there is no escaping commercials... I really miss the days when F1 was televised on the BBC. As the BBC is commercial free, the races are free flowing and we get to see the processional races (during the days of turbocars) in its entirety!
My 2 cents worth!;)
#17
Posted 22 August 2000 - 13:52
Since the telecast is tape-delayed, it seems to me that they could time the commercials so that we don't miss crucial action. I think it just shows how much these guys care and how amateurish F1 can be (they don't have any decent mechanism is place to ensure the quality of the race coverage).
Thank you.
#18
Posted 22 August 2000 - 14:02

Not willing to pay for SpeedVision though, while I'd like to be able to see the qualifying I don't think the extra coverage is worth the additional cash.
But hey, at least us Fox Sports peons will get Indy qualifying. In addition, Fox has announced they will be showing the two Friday practice sessions, which is very cool!

#19
Posted 22 August 2000 - 14:39
I do not know about cable or pay TV since I do not have any of them. I used to have cable (for a while) and directTV (also for a while) but they are so bad that I canceled them. At that time Speedvision was not available so I can not comment on them.
Similarly to comments from Brazil, soccer is king in Mexico and shadows anything that happens at the same hours.
Commentators are awful, I bet worst than in any other countrys [so please stop complaining


A related comment:
Last sunday (Aug 20) I was in Sao Paulo and watched the CART Elkhart Lake race in ESPN. First of all it was broadcasted at around 23:00 hours because of a volley ball tournament in which Brazil finished second.
The commentators spend the whole time talking only about the Brazilian drives and making up all kinds of probable (but laughable)scenarios under which a Brazilian would win. As each of the drivers was withdrawing they would point out the fault of the (pick one) car / track / crew / engine and move on to the next (by now improbable) scenario.
ESPN puts so many breaks (not necesarily commercials) that it is maddening. Their motto is World wide leaders in Sports, to me they are leaders in interrupting any event to announce up comming events.
So, in summary. I follow Formula 1 by comming to Atlas F1 almost on a daily basis, looking at other web pages, checking a few magazines and buying F1 books ... a sad state of affairs but is the best I got.[p][Edited by luisfelipetrigo on 08-22-2000]
Advertisement
#20
Posted 22 August 2000 - 15:09
Originally posted by Peter
If you get the (British) ITV feed in Canada, do you get "our" commercial breaks?
yeah we get the same breaks but TSN usualy make them longer.

#21
Posted 22 August 2000 - 16:16

#22
Posted 22 August 2000 - 17:00
Thankfully, we also are one of the few countries where digital coverage is available through cable or satellite, and whenever I can, I pay for the access to it, as there are no commercials whatsoever there.
#23
Posted 22 August 2000 - 17:05
#24
Posted 22 August 2000 - 17:12

ggg
#25
Posted 22 August 2000 - 17:15
When the first commercial break starts, the local broadcaster starts recording the unbroadcast part of the race and then starts the tape to show the continuation of the race uninterrupted when the ads end. And so on when the second and third and following breaks start.
So that viewers view the race in its entirety, albeit in "live on tape" mode.
Viewers would be get their money's worth (we DO PAY for cable) and advertisers would not be boycotted (I have vowed NEVER to buy a product or service advertised during an F1 broadcast under the actual colonial and commercially-centric conditions and to badmouth them until my last breath).
But this scheme is far too simple for those money-grabbing fat ass jerks who control electronic media. Duh.
F1 couch potatoes, rise from you sofas and revolt ! Don't spill any beer on your mothers' carpet..
Mass E-mail your local broadcaster, write to Bwana Bernie or start an "F1 Viewers Liberation Front" in your part of the asphalt jungle.
Hasta la Formula Uno siempre !
#26
Posted 22 August 2000 - 17:32
While it is technically feasible to do it (using Profile - a digital storage device), no broadcaster is going to buy the rights to show F1 live only to delay the coverage every time there is an ad break.
Following on from what someone else said about having 'picture in picture' adverts - where the advert runs with a inserted frame still showing the race - this has never been a satisfactory way of doing it for the companys running the adverts.
They are filmed and designed to run as full frame 4x3 commercials, if you take up half the picture with another frame it will ruin the advertisers expensive production - added to which it will distract you from focussing your attention on their product. Not a happy situation for the advertising companys and keeping them happy is what commercial television is all about, I'm afraid.
#27
Posted 22 August 2000 - 17:46
As for the way to access the channel, the TV decoder is equipped with two slots, one of which being occupied by your unique identification smart card. When you want to buy access to a Grand Prix, you have to connect the decoder to a phone line, and either ask it to add this price through your monthly bill for digital TV, or charge your credit card (if it is equipped with a chip) that you can put in the second available slot.
#28
Posted 22 August 2000 - 17:59
I don't think my idea is stupid (or daft as you say). In our highly commercialized media environments, the concept of "live" broadcast is not eliminated just because the total broadcast time of a sports event is extended by some 20 or 30 minutes.
Professional football, baseball, hockey and basketball have all been denatured, their rules bent to accomodate the broadcasting of commercials : have you ever sat in a stadium or arena waiting for the commercial pauses to end ? F1 Racing and Soccer (ie, real football) are the only two remaining professional sports which offer continuous uninterrupted action.
Your point would be valid if viewers had any other way of getting a race description (ie radio which is non-existing in F1, or "Live on Internet" word description).
We are continually asked to buy the concept of "live" by broadcasters who show us delayed "live" programming, sometimes by hours and by a day, if the viewers are in a faraway Time Zone. They dilute the term by admitting it's a "same day broadcast".
So there.
ABC Sports (USA) last Sunday showed the CART Elkhart Lake Race at least 2 hours after it had been over, NEVER mentioning that it was "live on tape". Duh.
Daft idea, no. Too good to be true, maybe.
"Time is an invention of Man"
"Imagination is more important than knowledge"
[Einstein]
#29
Posted 22 August 2000 - 19:04
If a broadcaster is forking out millions to show the race live and they have advertisers queuing up to buy air time then they aren't going to want to show the race delayed (and I don't think Bernie would be too happy about it either.) As soon as that happened another broadcaster would make a bid for the coverage on the basis that they would really show it live instead.
You're idea may work fine in the US if that is what you are all used to but it would never work here.
And I am more than qualified to comment because I work in Network Television.
#30
Posted 23 August 2000 - 04:20
Australia's F1 coverage has 5 ad breaks within the race from a length of 2 1/2 to 3 1/2 minutes. 3 1/2 minutes is too long, and we are slowly getting Channel 9 to lower the ads to 2 1/2 as per ITV's broadcast.
regards,
doohanOK.
http://www.f1fansvschannel9.com
#31
Posted 26 August 2000 - 01:56
#32
Posted 26 August 2000 - 11:07
#33
Posted 26 August 2000 - 12:22
#34
Posted 26 August 2000 - 19:17
#35
Posted 26 August 2000 - 19:21
I'd ban commercials that interrupt any type of programme. But since I can't, I just make it a point that if the show I taped has a commercial break I will NEVER watch the ads, but will FF, and if it's live, then I switch channels ,and switch back 2 or 3 minutes later. Usually f1 breaks on Fox are 3 minutes - 6 commercials x 30 sec.
Those words like "stay tuned" are like "Go to another channel for a couple of minutes" for me.
#36
Posted 26 August 2000 - 20:53
#37
Posted 27 August 2000 - 07:14
TMG
#38
Posted 27 August 2000 - 09:11
except for the really late ones due to timezones, like Canada (and of course Suzuka!;) )
no action is missed (I think).
This is concerning free TV of course.
#39
Posted 27 August 2000 - 09:31
Advertisement
#40
Posted 27 August 2000 - 10:14
#41
Posted 27 August 2000 - 21:16
#42
Posted 28 August 2000 - 21:19
These are all the camera angles taken by the local host broadcaster which are shown in the press room at the F1 circuits during qualifying and race.
Apparently, the more you pay, the more cameras you have at your disposal. Most countries only get the official feed but some are better "fed" than others.