
Anyone got any pictures of the new 'Variante Alta' chicane???
#1
Posted 20 April 2006 - 16:18
Advertisement
#2
Posted 20 April 2006 - 16:31

#3
Posted 20 April 2006 - 16:32
Shaun
#5
Posted 20 April 2006 - 17:24
(The other being Ascari at Monza).
#6
Posted 20 April 2006 - 17:35
#7
Posted 20 April 2006 - 17:46
Another slow corner....
#8
Posted 20 April 2006 - 19:52
Way to go

#9
Posted 20 April 2006 - 19:59
#10
Posted 20 April 2006 - 20:03
#11
Posted 20 April 2006 - 20:36
a bird told me that they are planning to add 3 more chicane on the pit straight as the speed is too high for their likings, they don't want to see speed in excess of 50mph.
the sooner FIA scratch Imola from the calendar, the better - I'd rather see Adelaide or Macau.
#12
Posted 20 April 2006 - 21:20
I think we will lose Imola eventually.
#13
Posted 20 April 2006 - 21:30
Originally posted by Linus27
I think we will lose Imola eventually.
yeah... and get what? valencia?
#14
Posted 20 April 2006 - 21:31

Another ball cut off F1. How many do we have left?
#15
Posted 20 April 2006 - 21:36
Originally posted by fumes
![]()
Another ball cut off F1. How many do we have left?
well, we have the "famous" turn 13 at indy ;)
#16
Posted 20 April 2006 - 22:06

#17
Posted 20 April 2006 - 22:21
I think we will lose Imola eventually.
What??? Now Imola is starting to look like decent F1 track. All it needs is 3-4 extra chicanes (surely we don´t want F1 cars to go fast trough the corners) and huge facilities...then Bernie & co can dump Monza instead

#18
Posted 20 April 2006 - 22:59

Why do they castrate circuits? Who no create more tricky corners? Should all be this easy slow left right Button type tracks?
#19
Posted 20 April 2006 - 23:16

Ted
Advertisement
#20
Posted 21 April 2006 - 00:33
I preferred the launch pad.
Imagine them queuing up into that corner....very exciting...NOT
Hell, looks like they could even stop in at the Cafe atop the hill and still rejoin without loss...
Jp
#21
Posted 21 April 2006 - 01:54
slower speeds = more time through the corner
more time through the orner = lingering camera angle(s)
lingering camera angles = more exposure for Vodafone

#22
Posted 21 April 2006 - 03:31
#23
Posted 21 April 2006 - 03:42

didn't need to be reprofiled to allow overtaking.
bummer that a slower corner is being applied.
need more fast corners, especially now that some drivers are having trouble with the forces they are dealing with. fatigue should definitely be a part of the game.
#24
Posted 21 April 2006 - 04:03
I suppose it's possible to pass if you've got a good run from Acqua Minerali, but then again the run up there isn't exactly as long as the one from the Spoon curve to the 130R.
#25
Posted 21 April 2006 - 04:29
#26
Posted 21 April 2006 - 05:57
In summary, I agree that this was Vodafone's doing!

#27
Posted 21 April 2006 - 06:26
Originally posted by micra_k10
Maybe Button won't be overtaken this time![]()
Why do they castrate circuits? Who no create more tricky corners? Should all be this easy slow left right Button type tracks?
To be fair it's probably more of a Renault/Ferrari type track given the importance of traction out of the slow exit.
#28
Posted 21 April 2006 - 07:11
And go very wide on the exit...
Probably the organizers will put some obstacles and we'll see some broken wings and stuff
(Of course I assume they don't intend to leave these tyre piles there

#29
Posted 21 April 2006 - 07:25
#30
Posted 21 April 2006 - 07:32
#31
Posted 21 April 2006 - 07:36
Originally posted by aisiai
Btw was it the corner where Barrichello broke his hand in '94 ?
No this chicane does not exist any more
#32
Posted 21 April 2006 - 09:08
#33
Posted 21 April 2006 - 09:44
Contemporary chicances, though, are more like short and slow S-bends, and about as interesting as that description implies.
#34
Posted 21 April 2006 - 11:24
Originally posted by wj_gibson
Contemporary chicances, though, are more like short and slow S-bends, and about as interesting as that description implies.
Sad, but true. The thread subject chicane at least brought some Imola trademark pictures with cars jumping over the kerbs, but seems this was too 'dangerous' for 'best drivers in the world' :
#35
Posted 21 April 2006 - 11:41
They should get rid rid of Variante Bassa too or at least re-profile it so it's quicker but still forces the drivers to lift and brake. Does anyone know if they are doing this with the modifications to the pits etc?
#36
Posted 21 April 2006 - 12:00
Originally posted by roadie
I think this is better than the old one. However, they really should have just gotten rid of the chicane all together. That would make for some awesome scenes down to Rivazza, although it would be more dangerous.
They should get rid rid of Variante Bassa too or at least re-profile it so it's quicker but still forces the drivers to lift and brake. Does anyone know if they are doing this with the modifications to the pits etc?
I think they should scrap the circuit altogether, and replace it with a sequence of 95 successive low, tight chicanes in a sound proof green house padded with 25 metre thick bubble wrap. The cars should then be forced to run BMC A-Series 850 engines (except STR who can run a rev-limited 1100). All drivers may be permitted to wear driving suits (a metal exo-skeleton which allows all of their motions to be controlled by computer). The entire race can then be run behind the safety car to prevent excessive overtaking and/or peril.
#37
Posted 21 April 2006 - 12:08

IDIOTS
#38
Posted 21 April 2006 - 12:55
I agree - the old chicane was quite tricky, and it sorted a lot of drivers out because if you rode the high kerbs and nailed your line it gave you a great chance at getting past the guy in front down the straight, whereas now it's on the brakes, one line through and avoid the kerbs, and follow the leader down to Ravazza.Originally posted by jonpollak
Oh Dear....
I preferred the launch pad.
Imagine them queuing up into that corner....very exciting...NOT
#39
Posted 21 April 2006 - 13:20
Originally posted by Linus27
I think we will lose Imola eventually.
In it's current form, wouldn't that be great?
They should have just eliminated the chincane entirely and painted vodafone on every other curb of the track.
Advertisement
#40
Posted 21 April 2006 - 13:50
Originally posted by Linus27
I think we will lose Imola eventually.
I would be happy to see the back of this sad looking eunuch of a track
Give Mugello a shot! Not perfect but clearly better that Imola as it is now
#41
Posted 21 April 2006 - 14:30
Originally posted by TedN
Found link to this pic at ten-tenths forum ....
Ted
Aha, it's that tight!
I like it.

#42
Posted 21 April 2006 - 22:44
#43
Posted 21 April 2006 - 22:57