


Posted 30 April 2006 - 03:10
Posted 30 April 2006 - 03:17
Posted 30 April 2006 - 03:21
Posted 30 April 2006 - 03:23
Posted 30 April 2006 - 03:27
Posted 30 April 2006 - 03:30
Originally posted by LB
Ok just googled it - moment of consternation because my Dad is in Tas at the moment.
I take it you are referring to the 3 spectators and the driver that are in serious conditionafter an accident.
well
Much as I have sympathy for them and I hope they all make a full recovery I hope this doesn't affect the targa at all. I've driven the route (more or less) and its some fantastic roads with some fantastic cars tackling them and I hope it continues for as long as we have petrol.
Back in the old days Motor racing tickets used to have a warning on the back - Motor racing is dangerous to spectate or take part in such events do so at their own risk (paraphrased) and that basically says it all it IS dangerous on both sides of the fence I've seen people die before my eyes at an event and at the same time nearly kill a few in the stands. Trust me its something you don't want to see however I go back and always will because like most of us i have petrol flowing through my veins, so do the competitors. To spectate or participate you are doing so of your own free will, something that in todays litigeous society seems a forgotten concept.
Posted 30 April 2006 - 03:32
Posted 30 April 2006 - 03:34
Originally posted by Calorus
Actually, the only way to really protect motorsport is to have it reclassified as Sado-Masochistic Euthenasia.
And I'll still go.
Posted 30 April 2006 - 03:37
Posted 30 April 2006 - 03:38
Originally posted by Calorus
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
+ It's still written on the tickets and the fences, but US rules as adopted by the world argue you have no right to risk your own skin, for ANYTHING.
Posted 30 April 2006 - 03:39
Originally posted by cosworth bdg
When you have TARGA & C.A.M.S. officials with **** for brains allowing spectators to stand and view the corner on the outside of corner ,right in the line of competeing vehicles ,you have a recipe for disaster ,of which happened yesterday....
Posted 30 April 2006 - 03:40
Originally posted by LB
its not - i noticed It wasn'y on my Brit GP tickets as of a few years ago least not that I noticed, I don't have any to hand, and it hasn't been on my knockhill tickets for a long while. Thanks for the's though
Posted 30 April 2006 - 03:47
Originally posted by cosworth bdg
When you have TARGA & C.A.M.S. officials with **** for brains allowing spectators to stand and view the corner on the outside of corner ,right in the line of competeing vehicles ,you have a recipe for disaster ,of which happened yesterday....
Posted 30 April 2006 - 06:21
Posted 30 April 2006 - 09:55
Now this is the ONLY time there can be any query. If you have someone who does want to be there contracted into standing somewhere stupid, that's a different story, altogether.Originally posted by Nasty McBastard
they make it pretty clear in signs, and in the targa 'official' guide you buy when trying to nut out good viewing spots etc, where you shouldnt be standing to watch targa....just another case of common sence not kicking in.
in a way im surprised targa is still going...seems like every 2nd year some driver gets killed wrapping himself around a telegraph pole, but this is the first thing i can think of with spectators.
there was a rally near hobart a few years ago where that footage everone must have seen by now was caught....the car spearing off the road and collecting a guy there filming for tv.
maybe the stereotype about tasmanians is kind true.
Posted 30 April 2006 - 10:23
Originally posted by cosworth bdg
Should these type of events be allowed on public roads
Posted 30 April 2006 - 11:16
Posted 30 April 2006 - 11:22
Advertisement
Posted 30 April 2006 - 11:48
Originally posted by A Wheel Nut
Shouldn't it be the event organisers responsibility to make sure spectators are unable to access potentially unsafe areas? If it were left to spectator discretion I imagine at least a few people would stand on the apex at Eau Rogue just to see the purdy cars up close as they go past really fast.
Posted 30 April 2006 - 12:57
Posted 30 April 2006 - 13:11
Originally posted by A Wheel Nut
Shouldn't it be the event organisers responsibility to make sure spectators are unable to access potentially unsafe areas? If it were left to spectator discretion I imagine at least a few people would stand on the apex at Eau Rogue just to see the purdy cars up close as they go past really fast.
Posted 30 April 2006 - 13:29
Originally posted by PassWind
Looking at the photo its a rather ordinary choice of spot.
Posted 30 April 2006 - 20:11
Posted 30 April 2006 - 20:35
Posted 30 April 2006 - 21:04
Originally posted by Vitesse2
But sooner or later there's going to be a big disaster on a rally, probably in Greece, Cyprus or Portugal where the spectators seem to have some sort of death wish and line the course so closely that they can touch the cars.
Posted 30 April 2006 - 21:12
That's moronic as perfectly illustrated by the Targa example. You may not be worried by the spectators being hurt, but the driver has also been injured in the incident.Originally posted by Calorus
I geniuinely things there should be "Red Zones" so you know you're in a dangerous position, and nothing more. If you don't know the course, I can perceive some danger, but people should be allow to be where hey want, as long as they aren't a danger to anyone else.
Posted 01 May 2006 - 00:05
According to the news report I heard, the spectators were in an approved spot but there was no safety barrier. If that's true, then I hope the officials get their just desserts because that was criminal. As everyone has said, cars at speed with spectators on the outside of the corner is just plain stupid.Originally posted by Vitesse2
I'm not familiar wth the Targa, but I'd be surprised if the field wasn't preceded by officials in a course car whose job would be to ensure that spectators were not in dangerous areas. If that's the case, then either the officials were negligent or the spectators chose to ignore the advice.
Posted 01 May 2006 - 00:31
Originally posted by smithy
According to the news report I heard, the spectators were in an approved spot but there was no safety barrier. If that's true, then I hope the officials get their just desserts because that was criminal. As everyone has said, cars at speed with spectators on the outside of the corner is just plain stupid.
Posted 01 May 2006 - 01:44
I accept what you are saying ,but the organisers [ OCTAGON]Originally posted by PassWind
http://www.news.com....36-1244,00.html
This story pretty well covers it. Driver error mixed accident mixed with people not really thinking it all through mixed with Motor Sports can be dangerous.
Easiest way not to get hurt is not go. Go, then accept the risks involved if you feel at risk leave, or move, if not throw your dice see what happens 9999 times out of 10000 you will have a blast. It only takes one accident to ruin a good day. If the car had not lost control, there would be nothing to talk about except the racing.
Accidents do happen, no one involved certainly intended the result. I don't think the position at the end of the turn is safe, but I say that in hindsight which is a wonderful thing. Being a spectator you make a pretty loose leap of faith that drivers will control their car within a small performance envelope, thats a pretty big personal call. Organisers are doing the same, its risky. Maybe bigger than some would accept.
Posted 01 May 2006 - 01:56
I accept what you are saying ,but the organisers [OCTAGON ] and C.A.M.S . are not capable of investigating the accident cause and ongoing consequences what ever whos fault it is or was..Originally posted by PassWind
http://www.news.com....36-1244,00.html
This story pretty well covers it. Driver error mixed accident mixed with people not really thinking it all through mixed with Motor Sports can be dangerous.
Easiest way not to get hurt is not go. Go, then accept the risks involved if you feel at risk leave, or move, if not throw your dice see what happens 9999 times out of 10000 you will have a blast. It only takes one accident to ruin a good day. If the car had not lost control, there would be nothing to talk about except the racing.
Accidents do happen, no one involved certainly intended the result. I don't think the position at the end of the turn is safe, but I say that in hindsight which is a wonderful thing. Being a spectator you make a pretty loose leap of faith that drivers will control their car within a small performance envelope, thats a pretty big personal call. Organisers are doing the same, its risky. Maybe bigger than some would accept.
Posted 01 May 2006 - 02:25
Originally posted by smithy
According to the news report I heard, the spectators were in an approved spot but there was no safety barrier. If that's true, then I hope the officials get their just desserts because that was criminal. As everyone has said, cars at speed with spectators on the outside of the corner is just plain stupid.
Posted 01 May 2006 - 02:29
Originally posted by cosworth bdg
I accept what you are saying ,but the organisers [ OCTAGON]
Posted 01 May 2006 - 02:57
It's in the Hobart Domain (central park), not the middle of the countryside.Originally posted by Calorus
IT'S a Rally, Of course there were no safety barrirs. Can you imagine the RAC if it had to be barriered?
Bye Bye WRC, bye bye All rally championships, bye bye Manx TT...
Posted 01 May 2006 - 03:21
Thank you somebody is reading what is being said here on this subject of public safety.Originally posted by smithy
It's in the Hobart Domain (central park), not the middle of the countryside.
The organisors know that they get amongst the biggest crowd for this section. Even those water filled plastic barriers would have been better than nothing, without being too much of an obstruction.
I accept that for most of the section's it's impracticle to put in barriers and I have just returned from Melbourne F1 where I lamented the 12 foot high fence in the way of everything. But in the centre of the city with large crowds there should have been something better than a plastic tape.
Posted 01 May 2006 - 04:19
Originally posted by cosworth bdg
Thank you somebody is reading what is being said here on this subject of public safety.
Posted 01 May 2006 - 05:02
But it's not public safety!Originally posted by cosworth bdg
Thank you somebody is reading what is being said here on this subject of public safety.
Posted 01 May 2006 - 06:10
Posted 01 May 2006 - 07:17
Advertisement
Posted 01 May 2006 - 09:39
Posted 01 May 2006 - 11:50
Originally posted by Nasty McBastard
in a way im surprised targa is still going...seems like every 2nd year some driver gets killed wrapping himself around a telegraph pole, but this is the first thing i can think of with spectators.
Posted 02 May 2006 - 11:29
Originally posted by LB
I thought ony one driver had died on the Targa back in 1996 at Rianna
Posted 02 May 2006 - 11:30
Posted 02 May 2006 - 11:35
Originally posted by Vitesse2
I'm not familiar wth the Targa, but I'd be surprised if the field wasn't preceded by officials in a course car whose job would be to ensure that spectators were not in dangerous areas. If that's the case, then either the officials were negligent or the spectators chose to ignore the advice.
Posted 02 May 2006 - 14:01