
Updraft Carbs?
#1
Posted 12 May 2006 - 20:42
Any ideas?
Advertisement
#2
Posted 12 May 2006 - 21:45
#3
Posted 13 May 2006 - 03:20
The inlet air was flowing over a bath off gasoline instead off using a venturie.
Why they did this?
Maybe nobody had thought off the idea off a venturie?
Maybe they had problems construction off one that was eacurate enough?
I think that someone was using a impeler that was splashing in the fuel to make a more fuel ritch air mixture
#4
Posted 13 May 2006 - 09:23
Meanwhile, with the updraft there is no chance of flooding if a float needle or other component leaks...the excess fuel merely runs out on the ground. Fuel was dirty and the seals were all metal-to-metal so float valves were constantly sticking.
#5
Posted 13 May 2006 - 11:22
#6
Posted 13 May 2006 - 12:17
Originally posted by Terry Walker
That's the answer. I remember the Ford A updraught, held together with a single bolt. It was perfectly conventional otherwise - a float and jet job. And yes, unfloodable. This was probably very important in the days of gravity feed, either direct from the tank, like the Ford A, or through an Autovac or similar which lifted fuel into a small tank on the firewall from where is flowed into the carb by gravity. A leaky float needle could empty the entire tank into the engine if the carby was downdraught. Many of those cars also had on-off fuel taps too. My Dad always turned off the fuel tap on his Ford A when he switched off.
Here is the Zenith Model B carb (Model B Ford), externally virtually identical to the Zenith Model A used on the Model A Ford. Larger venturi, improved high-speed circuit. As you say, if the fuel valve is left on and the float valve leaks, the next morning you may find the entire contents of the fuel tank (in the cowl, gravity feed) in a puddle on the ground.

#7
Posted 17 May 2006 - 04:58