Honda RA302
#1
Posted 12 November 2006 - 20:16
Rather an interesting one, am not too sure if I'm going to be able to do it justice, there's not too much reference material around, especially of the details. Still we'll see what happens.
To start off here's the basic chassis with the support for the engine.
#5
Posted 19 November 2006 - 23:12
#6
Posted 20 November 2006 - 19:52
Originally posted by JB Miltonian
Do you have the Werner Buhrer techical drawings as printed in Road & Track, 12/68?
Not to my Knowledge, I'm always open to additional reference materialto aid getting these models as acurate as possible.
Thnanks Macca, thos photos, while grainy do give a good view of the pedals, reservoirs etc
#7
Posted 20 November 2006 - 23:37
#8
Posted 21 November 2006 - 01:45
#9
Posted 21 November 2006 - 02:25
Perhaps it was a case of Soichiro Honda wanting to push too far, too fast. The car, not fully sorted as warned by test driver Surtees(?), was pressed into service and ultimately killed the hapless Schlesser. As a personal speculation, was it the magnesium chassis of the RA302 giving too much flex to be predictable?Originally posted by David M. Kane
Why did this car fail? It looks right...did the accident put everyone off including Surtees or am I all muddled up here?
This tragic beginning, enough to give the fledgling F1 constructor pause - reevaluating what was required to compete with drivers, wanting to drive his cars.
---
Another nice start there FW -
#10
Posted 21 November 2006 - 08:44
I have just had a look at your website for the first time and am not quite sure what I'm seeing. Are you creating attractive and interesting illustrations of these cars, or is this in preparation for constructing models of them?
I guess the illustrations are as a result of CAD, a bit after my time, as during my time as a an engineering draughtsman, clutch pencils were the current technological drawing aid!
As I said, I'm very impressed with your website.
#11
Posted 21 November 2006 - 09:41
Originally posted by rdrcr
Perhaps it was a case of Soichiro Honda wanting to push too far, too fast. The car, not fully sorted as warned by test driver Surtees(?), was pressed into service and ultimately killed the hapless Schlesser. As a personal speculation, was it the magnesium chassis of the RA302 giving too much flex to be predictable?
Who will ever know how the RA 302 could have fared if tested and set-up properly.
When John Surtees tested the car, he found it uneasy and unstable, and refused to race it until he had tested it further.
Soichiro Honda was on a European tour in 1968 and was going to be present at the French GP. It was Honda France who insisted that the RA302 be entered for the GP. Schlesser was drafted in to drive it.
As a bit of technology, the RA302 was of a completely different level to the other period cars racing.
Sadly it's tenure ended in disaster.
#12
Posted 21 November 2006 - 10:11
#13
Posted 21 November 2006 - 12:43
Originally posted by Paul Rochdale
FW11B
I have just had a look at your website for the first time and am not quite sure what I'm seeing. Are you creating attractive and interesting illustrations of these cars, or is this in preparation for constructing models of them?
I guess the illustrations are as a result of CAD, a bit after my time, as during my time as a an engineering draughtsman, clutch pencils were the current technological drawing aid!
As I said, I'm very impressed with your website.
Thanks for the comments, these models are purely illustrative.
#14
Posted 21 November 2006 - 21:31
Originally posted by Bonde
Even if Honda eventually had got the RA302 right, handling-wise, it would still have been a very dangerous car to have a shunt in: Note how the driver's feet protrude well in front of the front axle line, with no significant structure around the foot-well. Even a minor frontal collsion would have shattered the driver's feet and legs, IMO.
No IMO about it Anders !! you're absolutely right......just bleeding dangerous.
But I still find the rest of the car of huge technical interest.
#16
Posted 21 November 2006 - 22:15
Paul M
#17
Posted 21 November 2006 - 22:39
I do agree that the car is refreshingly different and technically very interesting - for no rational reason, I've got a soft spot for air-cooled (sortof) engines. Apart from the safety aspect, I also like the structure of the RA302 - and I think it looks very interesting, too - as did most of the 1966-1969 cars as they evolved, slowly but surely, from the inherently pretty classic cigar shape and grew horny tyre sizes, sprouted aerodynamic appendages and left the big 3L engines and their induction and exhaust systems exposed for all to enjoy!
BTW: Were any detailed models or assembly kits ever produced of the RA302?
Keep up the good work, FW11B! Do you take comissions for contemporary Formula Fords?
#18
Posted 21 November 2006 - 23:08
Originally posted by Bonde
BTW: Were any detailed models or assembly kits ever produced of the RA302?
Apparantly available to order:
http://www.modell-pa...make_Honda.html
#19
Posted 22 November 2006 - 00:12
Advertisement
#20
Posted 22 November 2006 - 05:23
#21
Posted 22 November 2006 - 19:34
Surtees encouraged that an aluminium version be built but money and time ran out I guess. If you can read Japanese, there is a brilliant website set up now that focuses on this period of Honda's GP history including something that was unknown to me: Bucknum test drove the RA301 at Indianapolis in 1968.
http://www.honda.co....t4-1/index.html
Surtees wasn't allowed to drive because he didn't have a US rookie test under his belt like Bucknum did.
#22
Posted 25 November 2006 - 13:22
Originally posted by Paul Taylor
What program do you use to make these, FW11B? 3DS Max?
A little known programme called Cinema4D, not the best programme, but certainly not the worst, and I seem to be able to get reasonable results from it in a reasonable time. I've looked at Maya and Max but I haven't the patience to sit down and learn a new programme at the moment, what would take me hours to figure out in Maya or max I can do in a couple of minutes in Cinema4D.
Little bit more progress, also revisited the nose and have that better tahn it was now....
It's fascinating to read all the posts concerning these cars
#23
Posted 25 November 2006 - 13:39
Take care on some details though...that oil radiator up front is way too deep/thick.
#26
Posted 25 November 2006 - 18:36
Originally posted by FW11B
A little known programme called Cinema4D, not the best programme, but certainly not the worst, and I seem to be able to get reasonable results from it in a reasonable time. I've looked at Maya and Max but I haven't the patience to sit down and learn a new programme at the moment, what would take me hours to figure out in Maya or max I can do in a couple of minutes in Cinema4D.
I acquired Cinema 4D the other day, actually! I love it! I've only managed to design a sink so far, following a tutorial Never done 3D modelling before. Sorry to take the thread slightly off topic, but do you know how to cut shapes out of polygons? I can't work out how to make round holes. :
#29
Posted 26 November 2006 - 17:37
Cheers - Art
http://i24.photobuck...02bigpic_03.jpg
http://i24.photobuck...02bigpic_01.jpg
http://i24.photobuck...02bigpic_06.jpg
http://i24.photobuck...Italian20GP.jpg
http://i24.photobuck..._V5N11_p566.jpg
http://i24.photobuck..._V5N11_p567.jpg
BTW: I don't know much about this vB code thingy. How should I edit my post so that You guys could see my pics as thumbnails and not links like above?
#30
Posted 26 November 2006 - 18:04
I don't know anything about Photobucket, I use ImageShack to do the thumbnails
#32
Posted 26 November 2006 - 22:14
Johnny Servoz Gavin was first asked to drive it at Rouen. He declined and chose a well-tried Cooper-Maserati instead. Schlesser was very anxious to break into Grand Prix racing. By all accounts, he was delighted to drive it even if it wasn't quite good.Originally posted by macoran
It was Honda France who insisted that the RA302 be entered for the GP. Schlesser was drafted in to drive it.
#33
Posted 26 November 2006 - 22:30
#34
Posted 26 November 2006 - 23:25
Art, where and when were the pictures of the car wearing number 5 taken?Originally posted by Art-J
A few front and engine shots from my archive. Plus a short article in "Model Cars". I hope these will come handy!
Cheers - Art
http://i24.photobuck...02bigpic_03.jpg
http://i24.photobuck...02bigpic_01.jpg
http://i24.photobuck...02bigpic_06.jpg
http://i24.photobuck...Italian20GP.jpg
http://i24.photobuck..._V5N11_p566.jpg
http://i24.photobuck..._V5N11_p567.jpg
BTW: I don't know much about this vB code thingy. How should I edit my post so that You guys could see my pics as thumbnails and not links like above?
#35
Posted 27 November 2006 - 05:30
#36
Posted 27 November 2006 - 23:50
Here's a pretty good shot of the interior as it was when it was raced in Rouen.
#37
Posted 28 November 2006 - 00:54
#38
Posted 29 November 2006 - 17:23
Originally posted by Roger Clark
Art, where and when were the pictures of the car wearing number 5 taken?
Unfortunately, I don't really know it. As far as I remember from discussion on another board I got these shots from, they were probably taken somewhere in the '70s or '80s, in Japan. I have some photos from the same series, with RA300 and RA301 on them. I doubt that all the cars were in running condition when the pics were taken. The RA300 for example is painted in "Kyalami 1968" pattern, its tires are a little worn-out and it clearly shows some stain on engine parts and rust on brake discs. There's also a Japanese lady, posing next to it and she wears clothes and glasses obviously not from "our times". So it must be long after the Honda withdrew in '68, but before they restored their cars to the tip-top state we can witness in the museum (or Goodwood) now.
The engine on the 302 looks very well and clean, but as I understand, this chassis nr 2 didn't spend much time on the racetracks, did it?...
Cheers - Art
#39
Posted 03 December 2006 - 17:34
Have made some alterations to the engine following more reference material. Also got the basics of the gearbox in place....
The gearbox may not necessarily be 100% acurate but I hope it's close enough to give the right impression of what it was like.
Advertisement
#40
Posted 04 December 2006 - 06:37
What were they revving the aircooled V8 to?
Was it really an advance over the V12 in terms of power and light weight?
#42
Posted 09 December 2006 - 14:08
#43
Posted 09 December 2006 - 17:56
Originally posted by David M. Kane
I can't tell you how much fun your work brings into my small world. These cars you do are so neat!
Thanks David, I have an enjoyable time creating the models. I hope they spark debate and an interest in the cars themselves, they deserve it.
#44
Posted 09 December 2006 - 21:32
Originally posted by David M. Kane
I can't tell you how much fun your work brings into my small world. These cars you do are so neat!
One reason why I pester him to do the one's I like to see
#47
Posted 19 December 2006 - 13:15
Originally posted by macoran
You are running a mite too much negative camber on the left front FW
Sorry....couldn't resist....please keep plodding
Just a tad
#48
Posted 19 December 2006 - 15:53
#49
Posted 19 December 2006 - 16:11
Originally posted by Barry Boor
Please, what does half a tad look like?
It all has to do with sense of perception Barry.....as with colours like BRG and Cooper Indy "blue".
I would estimate half a tad to be a sixteenth of a mite.
As I said perception ... here is FW saying he is plodding along...while he should be plotting...or doesn't the program work that way ?