
The most frustrating thing about F1 is.....
#1
Posted 04 January 2007 - 12:43
The aero issues I have addressed on another thread. Simple but effective, requiring little change in the direction of design and improving the problems of aero sensitivity and reducing aero grip (thus decreasing the difference that what aero sensitivity is left will make).
Implement a change to the regs whereby the throttle may not be used as a part of TC (as outlined in the 2008 draft regs, where throttle /pedal position are defined). This will swing the use of TC firmly into the ignition retardation method, not good for the health of the engines so limiting the amount of TC to be used.
Refuelling or tyre changes during a pit-stop - not both together. This will open the door for a wider variety of tactics and will necessarily reduce the race speeds as a full 'reset' can no longer be performed. How much difference might that have made to the 2005 season - whereby Ferrari could compensate for their less durable tyres by carrying more fuel - especially if.....
Qualifying was low fuel throughout. Qualify and then sort out the fuel levels.
Advertisement
#2
Posted 04 January 2007 - 13:27
#3
Posted 04 January 2007 - 13:40
I remember that they already wanted to get rid off TC back in 2003 or so but that didnt go on because sir Frank and Ron Dennis didnt want a ban of TC. Only LC was removed then.
#4
Posted 04 January 2007 - 13:44
Originally posted by carbonfibre
Exactly the problem is politics. The FIA just can't remove all things, the teams have to agree on it as well.
I remember that they already wanted to get rid off TC back in 2003 or so but that didnt go on because sir Frank and Ron Dennis didnt want a ban of TC. Only LC was removed then.
And evev that only happened on paper ;) Removing it effectively would have required measures the teams woudln´t have agreed with (banning some of their electronical toys).
#5
Posted 04 January 2007 - 14:02
The feeling to be the only one who sees the light must be really frustrating ;)Originally posted by angst
The inability of those involved to be able to see the simple things.
Don't you think that if it would be so easy, it would have been done before?
Zoe
#6
Posted 04 January 2007 - 14:07
You remember it wrong. It was kept because it could not be policed. If Frank and Ron did anything it was to simply prove that "look, I have TC hidden in this little tiny cable here, can you ever spot it"?Originally posted by carbonfibre
I remember that they already wanted to get rid off TC back in 2003 or so but that didnt go on because sir Frank and Ron Dennis didnt want a ban of TC. Only LC was removed then.
I have no problem with you hating Ron, but dont do it for the wrong reasons.
#7
Posted 04 January 2007 - 14:16

What in that text makes you think i hate Ron? I also mentioned sir Frank Williams so i must hate him as well. Sometimes i have a hard time following what you are trying to say really.
#8
Posted 04 January 2007 - 14:22
#9
Posted 04 January 2007 - 14:23
#10
Posted 04 January 2007 - 14:25
Nothing in that text spells out hate (what a silly word in this context) altough the example in itself indicates that your heart does not lie in either Williams or McLaren. But when combining your posts a pattern becomes clear. Do you deny it?;)Originally posted by carbonfibre
![]()
What in that text makes you think i hate Ron? I also mentioned sir Frank Williams so i must hate him as well. Sometimes i have a hard time following what you are trying to say really.
#11
Posted 04 January 2007 - 14:30
I have no hatred towards Ron and most certainly not towards sir Frank Williams. Both men have accomplished a lot in their F1 careers, won world title's etc etc. But i would prefer Frank over Ron outside of the accomplishments yes that is true. But most certainly not hatred.
I assume this has to do with the last thread about "Ron not letting Kimi go"? I think you got the wrong signal there.
#12
Posted 04 January 2007 - 14:35

#13
Posted 04 January 2007 - 14:38
No problem, things like that happen, especially on a discussion board.Originally posted by Limits
Ok, my mistake![]()

#14
Posted 04 January 2007 - 15:09
#15
Posted 04 January 2007 - 15:38
#16
Posted 04 January 2007 - 15:40
#17
Posted 04 January 2007 - 15:40
#18
Posted 04 January 2007 - 15:43
#19
Posted 04 January 2007 - 15:46
Advertisement
#20
Posted 04 January 2007 - 15:54
Good point. When all the cars look the same in a non spec series, something is wrong.Originally posted by lukywill
mainly cars look the same. it´s like having creativity locked up and guys like thiessen look fools when talking for a ban of 'no original cars'.
#21
Posted 04 January 2007 - 15:56
Us, fans who continue bitching about how bad F1 is, but continue to waste every second summer Sunday afternoon watching it ;)
Us fans who dig for €200+ to get baked in sun for whole day and wait in lines to toitoi toilets to see cars passing by for 100 minutes ;)
We fans, viewers and consumers, we pay for this 'monster' to get more fat and lazy, every single year...
If for once...we would stay away from F1 for a season...

#22
Posted 04 January 2007 - 16:13
I also find it pretty incredible that people who seemingly think so little of F1 spend countless hours following it. That in itself is often pretty amusing.
"But I follow it because of the glory days back in the 60s"
Well that was 40 years ago, time to get a life if you think the sport is so bad.
#23
Posted 04 January 2007 - 16:17
#24
Posted 04 January 2007 - 16:23
Originally posted by lukywill
you are forgetting the force of addition.

#25
Posted 04 January 2007 - 16:24
I doubt that Max main objective is to make the fans miserable, but I also doubt that his main objecytive is to make them happy. Fans are a necessary evil in all sports.Originally posted by tifosi
I think I'll have to agree with Zoe on this one. I find it incredible that there are adult humans who actually believe Max sits in some room planning ways to make F1 fans miserable.
I also find it pretty incredible that people who seemingly think so little of F1 spend countless hours following it. That in itself is often pretty amusing.
"But I follow it because of the glory days back in the 60s"
Well that was 40 years ago, time to get a life if you think the sport is so bad.
But maybe the problem is not F1, the problem is that motorsport in general have very little coverage and in many countries the only series you can truly follow is F1. If you are a motorsport fan living far away from an active track, TV is your only hope and on that TV there is only F1. If there was a genuine possibility to follow another category of motorsport I think maybe the situation would be different. But in reality, the true motorsport enthusiasts are quite few and selling commercials during the broadcasts of for instance a Formula Ford race is propably not an easy task. Fotball is to blame. Ban it.
#26
Posted 04 January 2007 - 16:31

#27
Posted 04 January 2007 - 16:49
Originally posted by HP
Funny typo
it´s that evil google.

#28
Posted 04 January 2007 - 16:49
- Never ending changes in technical regulations
- Aero went too far
- Commercial bickering
- Inconsistencies on part of Stewards of the Race
- TV presentation could be more professional
- Tracks hasn't kept up in terms of development with the cars
- Trend we see in changing tracks
- FIA' involvement; too often, too much, too... of everything
- Ownership at the end of the grid resembles more of a cash-cow, than realistic involvement of someone who can stay-in for a while...
Otherwise I am fine.
#29
Posted 04 January 2007 - 16:59
- there's not enough overtaking
- the whole FIA / Ferrari bias
- Only 2 constructors ever challenge for the lead on any one season nowadays
- The quality of ITV's coverage, with a special mention to Mark Blundell who cannot even speak english
- pit stop strategys dictating race wins rather than overtaking
- engine failures dictating race wins and qualifying positions
- It's not on the telly in the winter

#30
Posted 04 January 2007 - 18:07

#31
Posted 04 January 2007 - 19:39
Originally posted by HBoss
Max.


#32
Posted 04 January 2007 - 22:55
Most of the directors are crap, a few races are shown ok.
Personally i like all the politics, without it the races wouldn't be any better. It only detracts from the racing if you switch the TV off and go and read about during the race. Plus I wouldn't have anything to read about when I am at work.
#33
Posted 05 January 2007 - 00:00
#34
Posted 05 January 2007 - 00:02

#35
Posted 05 January 2007 - 01:32
They belong on street cars not F1 cars.
I'd like to see F1 cars so difficult to drive that literally only 20 people in the world could handle them, not any old F3 driver that plops into them.
#36
Posted 05 January 2007 - 01:59
The decisions that we all tend to complain about typically make sense only when you consider the financial outcome.
#37
Posted 05 January 2007 - 02:58
Originally posted by angst
The inability of those involved to be able to see the simple things. F1 could be so much better with just tiny tweaks of the regs.
The aero issues I have addressed on another thread. Simple but effective, requiring little change in the direction of design and improving the problems of aero sensitivity and reducing aero grip (thus decreasing the difference that what aero sensitivity is left will make).
Implement a change to the regs whereby the throttle may not be used as a part of TC (as outlined in the 2008 draft regs, where throttle /pedal position are defined). This will swing the use of TC firmly into the ignition retardation method, not good for the health of the engines so limiting the amount of TC to be used.
Brilliant.
Refuelling or tyre changes during a pit-stop - not both together. This will open the door for a wider variety of tactics and will necessarily reduce the race speeds as a full 'reset' can no longer be performed.








Superb idea.
Do the FIA bashers like or dislike this though? They tend to complain about regulations that are "artificial"... They may be prone to make comments such as "stupid FIA decrees that pit stops shall be for refuel or new tyres only, not both, in other news Mosley is a moron the racing should be on the track not allocated based on how many tricks your team circus monkeys can perform in 3 minutes etc."
#38
Posted 05 January 2007 - 03:38
No, they don't like it ;)Originally posted by V8 Fireworks
Superb idea.
Do the FIA bashers like or dislike this though?
Seriously, easiest way is to simple make the pitstops take longer time. Maybe one guy per wheel, no refuelling while car is on jacks (that CAN be justified as non-artificial becaus eit is safer) and very low pit speed limit. Maybe simply halve the allowed pit lane speed would do, so that the people that gets a hard-on from them fast F1 pitsops (they are, I am sure, all TV producers) can get their fill.
#39
Posted 05 January 2007 - 03:48
Ban all rules that were introduced to reduce cost, since they did not.
Bring back Friday testing for the lower teams, or any such measure that might help close the gap.
Equalize the funding, or any such measure that may help close the gap.
But the most frustrating thing is the willy-nilly FIA decisions. That's got to stop...

Advertisement
#40
Posted 05 January 2007 - 04:12
#41
Posted 05 January 2007 - 04:15
I can only think one. Extreme stupid fanboys in F1 related forums.

#42
Posted 05 January 2007 - 15:17
You have him confused with DC...Originally posted by Rexx Havoc
That Nick Heidfield thinks he has 10 years left in F1

#43
Posted 05 January 2007 - 15:40
Originally posted by Zoe
The feeling to be the only one who sees the light must be really frustrating ;)
Don't you think that if it would be so easy, it would have been done before?
Zoe
No. because everybody's so busy sorting out the 'gravy train' they don't give a sh*t about the fans. Why have they put any aerodynamic changes 'on the backburner' until at least 2009. Everybody knows there is a problem with aero sensitivity - are they so stupid that they can't come up with anything for three years? No, but they can't be arsed.
#44
Posted 05 January 2007 - 16:01
Who is they ?Originally posted by angst
are they so stupid that they can't come up with anything for three years? No, but they can't be arsed.
Zoe
#45
Posted 05 January 2007 - 16:08
#46
Posted 05 January 2007 - 16:17
All problem I see in F1 are related to the cars: aero, brakes... .... ....
#47
Posted 05 January 2007 - 16:35
#48
Posted 05 January 2007 - 18:31
#49
Posted 05 January 2007 - 18:39
people who go on and on about conspiracy theories, and/or whocantb botherd type coheenrnt post's.
#50
Posted 05 January 2007 - 19:40

But at least everyone "involved" is putting food on the table.