
Louis T Stanley Esq
#1
Posted 21 January 2007 - 19:53
Unfortunatly probably still blamed for the demise of the nations much loved BRM but if I would be allowed to fight in his corner so to speak if not for just brief while?
Brian Redman once was quoted in saying that in motor racing avoid working for Louis Stanley or Sid Taylor well like Brian and others I managed this task and lived to tell the tale and I have still great affection for Sid and until his demise Big Lou (although I never dared to refer to him as this, it started as Mr.Stanley and progressed to Louis)
Unfortunatly with the progress of design and developement the team from Bourne somehow became in the "catch up" mode and alas never did, the Southgate and then the Pilbeam designed cars i.e. P160 to P201 were very good cars and Big Lou was ahead of his time by factoring good backing from marlboro and others but felt that if you could run one car,then two why not more to which the extra income would swell the coffers, we all know this was folly but to continue onwards with what was becoming a smaller outfit still running P201 into the mid seventies now entitled Stanley-BRM and then it looked like a re invention with the Rotary backed 207 but the car was probably rushed and placed the designer in a compromise although Len Terry,Alan Challis,Stan Hope,Cyril Maylem(CTG),David Hepworth and others tried so hard in vain but Big Lou was always a optimist to a fault,I think it was the 1977 British GP when Guy Edwards was drafted in(with sponsor cash) and Lou telephoned David Hepworth who was setting off for Silverstone saying he expected Guy to be at least in the top half of the grid and this would shock and surpize all the "knockers" unfortunatly Guy drove with verve but did not even pre qualify!
Great personel have emerged from BRM, Southgate and Pilbeam great down to earth designers,Alan Challis such a practical man, and many,many more who like myself still speak of the man in the bespoke Dunhill blazer with great affection, and the good staff as mentioned stayed at Bourne for long periods rather to dissapear for a more succesful team, you could converse with this man on so many subjects from Golf to Rugby to Fine art and in my bookcase I have still various signed copies of his written work and still some coasters from the Dorchester.
Stuart, your feelings pl;ease.
Rodney Dodson
Advertisement
#2
Posted 21 January 2007 - 20:29
Originally posted by rdmotorsport
Brian Redman once was quoted in saying that in motor racing avoid working for Louis Stanley or Sid Taylor...
I could probably understand avoiding working for the former, but the latter?

Shurely shome mishtake here...
#3
Posted 21 January 2007 - 20:44
#4
Posted 21 January 2007 - 20:46
Originally posted by Gary C
there are some pretty heated feelings on the forum about Big Lou...............
But never once a bad word about Sid...
#5
Posted 21 January 2007 - 21:08
#7
Posted 21 January 2007 - 22:41
When I was 10 or 11, we had a school project to do, I naturally chose the history of the motor car and once completed with my drawings copied from the old Brooke Bond picture cards, I plucked up the courage to knock on his door one day to ask him if he would like to read it. Unfortunately he was not in, but the cleaning lady said she would give it to him. To my delight I received it back in the post with a lovely letter which I still have and signed black and white photos of all Yardley BRM drivers plus press shots of the P160 and one of him and Jean. Also an invitation to the BRM open day! Alas my father could not get the time to take me and would not let me miss school for it either...
He was very kind to this young fan I must say, however I had only brief meetings with him in later life.
#8
Posted 22 January 2007 - 08:41
Few of life's darker or more controversial characters are all bad. Just this week Brian Lister - a fellow Cambridge man (like BL) - sent me a cutting from the local newspaper, reporting the following:
"A top Cambridge writer who died in 2004 has left much of his £500,000 estate to good causes in the city area..." - £200,000 went to the children's hospice at Milton - and the Acorn House home-from-home facility run by the Sick Children's Trust at Addenbrooke's Hospital - for those who don't know a British cancer-treatment centre of excellence - receives £10,000.
Executor John Tarrant - BL's Cambridge lawyer - had been directed in the will to donate the bulk of the estate to good causes, especially local ones, and it was left to Mr Tarrant's discretion to decide which ones. BL did not select the beneficiaries, he delegated the task.
Still not all bad, eh?
But I cannot help wondering just how well BRM fortunes 1969-77 might have improved had BL in his pomp been so willing to delegate to those who knew better?
DCN
#9
Posted 22 January 2007 - 11:00
#10
Posted 22 January 2007 - 11:49
Originally posted by MCS
But never once a bad word about Sid...
Most of what I know about Sid Taylor has come from TNF, a real wheeler dealer in the classic style, but nothing too bad apart from the Patrick Tambay F1 contract 'negotiations'. It has to be said though, that Pete Gethin told anyone who asked that the two shark emblems on his helmet represented Sid Taylor and Louis Stanley, both of whom he had first hand experience of as a driver. No smoke without fire...?
#11
Posted 23 January 2007 - 13:51
#12
Posted 23 January 2007 - 18:11
I remember the BRM reunion at Donington in 1992 IIRC, where there were large numbers of ex-BRM mechanics, Tony Rudd, etc.........and Jean and Lou Stanley, not talking to any of them.
Paul M
#13
Posted 23 January 2007 - 21:45

#14
Posted 24 January 2007 - 09:50
Originally posted by Doug Nye
![]()
Come on Doug, don't just sit there feeling smug. You're going to have to spill a few beans and say something to dispel our cherished illusions of Louis Stanley's innate decency and niceness. He fooled Andrew, RD and me at the time, but he clearly never fooled you.
#15
Posted 24 January 2007 - 09:51
#16
Posted 24 January 2007 - 09:53
Originally posted by Andrew Kitson
Yes, but I was very young and didn't know any better!
I was barely out of teenage at the time myself, but that's no excuse.
#17
Posted 25 January 2007 - 06:04
I sent him a copy of the proofs, and by way of a polite letter, I asked him to write a foreword for the book. I was summoned to the Cambridge mansion for a long evening's "chat", fundamentally an interview to see if I passed muster and knew what I was talking about. Apparently I did, and he wrote a most gracious and complimentary foreword, for which I was truly grateful.
I remember him fondly and with admiration for what he did for drivers' injury care, at a time when too many of them needed it.
#18
Posted 25 January 2007 - 08:30
Originally posted by kayemod
Come on Doug, don't just sit there feeling smug. You're going to have to spill a few beans and say something to dispel our cherished illusions of Louis Stanley's innate decency and niceness. He fooled Andrew, RD and me at the time, but he clearly never fooled you.
Can you be so sure - it's quite easily done?

As Mike Henderson relates, there was a positive side.
DCN
PS - Greetings Michael - Cyril Posthumus and I ran your articles on motor racing in safety in 'Motor Racing' magazine, and I helped our former colleagues Pat Stephens and Darryl Reach when they were producing your life-changing/sport-changing book. Great piece of work, might I add, and one which plainly had infinitely greater influence and effect within 'our area' than almost any other book I can think of.
#19
Posted 26 January 2007 - 06:53
Louis Stanley was very good to me. He made sure that Jackie Stewart had a harness in the BRM within a few days of our first "chat". His words to me, as I recall them, were to the effect that Stewart would have belts whether he wanted them or not. As you probably remember, Stanley had all kinds of difficulty with many entrenched medical ideas - and we can list a few drivers who died because of these attitudes. In his foreword he contrasted my "cheerfully enthusiastic" attitude with my "more morose medical colleagues", which I enjoyed. His pomposity could be punctured. I expect he appreciated Sid Watkins' iconoclasm.
Advertisement
#20
Posted 27 January 2007 - 09:35
I feel it was probably all let down in the end by finance , the team always had good named sponsors on the side of the car which was due to Louis and his eloquence but I feel the payment for all this was less than people assumed or am I being naive again Doug?, and therefore although excellent and loyal staff were about developement funds were not, but still it was fun.
Rodney Dodson.
#21
Posted 28 January 2007 - 15:15
Finally come on Doug tell all,I know he was pompous at times,I know he could be arrogant(but I have been accused of this),I suppose I knew he could be devious but let us all know.
#22
Posted 28 January 2007 - 18:20
#23
Posted 28 January 2007 - 18:59
Originally posted by rdmotorsport
Finally come on Doug tell all,I know he was pompous at times,I know he could be arrogant(but I have been accused of this),I suppose I knew he could be devious but let us all know.
Sorry - either other people will tell the story or - if spared - I will relate as much as I know in BRM Volume 4. Now is neither the right time, nor place.
DCN
#24
Posted 28 January 2007 - 19:33
#25
Posted 28 January 2007 - 19:34

#26
Posted 28 January 2007 - 21:06
#27
Posted 28 January 2007 - 22:25
#28
Posted 29 January 2007 - 09:37
#29
Posted 29 January 2007 - 21:20
DCN

#30
Posted 30 January 2007 - 09:46
#31
Posted 30 January 2007 - 13:04
Originally posted by Doug Nye
2009 (ish) ?????
DCN![]()
In a couple of years sounds so much better to my ears.
Still any sort of Vol 4 date is good news for me as it is the only volume I really want.
Geoff
#32
Posted 30 January 2007 - 19:32
#33
Posted 30 January 2007 - 19:50
#34
Posted 31 January 2007 - 08:08
Ah...the Force is strong in this one.Originally posted by Rob Ryder
What about Vol.3 Doug???
#35
Posted 31 January 2007 - 10:33
#36
Posted 31 January 2007 - 18:36
DCN
(Strangely enough, I just dialled on to TNF to see what troubles abound as a 5 min break from V3-ing... If this stuff was easy - or profitable - everybody would be doing it. But right now it IS on its way......As for "V4 is the only one I'm interested in" - oh thank you sooo much for the encouragement...

#37
Posted 31 January 2007 - 19:31
#38
Posted 01 February 2007 - 08:08
Keep up the good work.

#39
Posted 01 February 2007 - 08:24
Originally posted by Catalina Park
Doug, I would rather wait for a book that you are happy with than nag you into producing something that you don't like.
Keep up the good work.![]()
The way things are going, and with the apparent increasing frailty of some TNFs, perhaps BRM volumes 3 & 4 should be released in large print.
#41
Posted 01 February 2007 - 09:39
Originally posted by Sharman
Many a true word.......
And what about poor Doug? If he's spared, he'll probably have to write BRM volumes 3 & 4 in large print as well.
#42
Posted 01 February 2007 - 10:36
#43
Posted 01 February 2007 - 12:31
Originally posted by kayemod
And what about poor Doug? If he's spared, he'll probably have to write BRM volumes 3 & 4 in large print as well.
And can we have each forthcoming volume split into....volumes. Those big books are awfully heavy.
#44
Posted 01 February 2007 - 13:27
Originally posted by ian senior
And can we have each forthcoming volume split into....volumes. Those big books are awfully heavy.
Fascicles is the word. The OED came out that way originally (New! This month! Collect Pedantry to Pedestal! as they'd no doubt say these days), and so does that other much-delayed, much-expanded definitive work The Art Of Computer Programming, which is up there with BRM as a work of consuming passion... (Donald Knuth thought he could write everything known about the underlying maths and theory of computer programming in one volume in the early sixties. It's now 2007 and he's still writing.... mind you he did take nearly ten years out to design the most beautiful typesetting system in the world in the 70s...;))
#45
Posted 01 February 2007 - 20:25
God, now I am lost does involve steam and coal?
#46
Posted 03 May 2012 - 11:27


Edited by Alan Cox, 03 May 2012 - 11:37.
#47
Posted 03 May 2012 - 11:35
Donington Superprix 2006 - BRM Celebration
![]()
Good photos of Louis and Jean Stanley, Alan, but they must be earlier than 2006. Jean had a stroke in around 2000 I think, and died in 2002. Louis died in 2004.
#48
Posted 03 May 2012 - 11:38
Sorry John. My gaffe - Read 1996. Original post edited.Good photos of Louis and Jean Stanley, Alan, but they must be earlier than 2006. Jean had a stroke in around 2000 I think, and died in 2002. Louis died in 2004.
#49
Posted 03 May 2012 - 17:10
The day that they happily signed my copy of Mr Nye's BRM Volume 1.Donington Superprix 1996 - BRM Celebration
![]()