

F1 races at night!
#1
Posted 16 February 2007 - 16:58

Advertisement
#2
Posted 16 February 2007 - 17:04
#3
Posted 16 February 2007 - 17:10
#4
Posted 16 February 2007 - 17:19
The goal is to make more money. That's why it has been suggested a long while ago to hold a night race in Malaysia. There might be more people at the track.Originally posted by slapstick
If the goal is to make F1 greener imitating sun on the race tracks is not such a good idea.
#5
Posted 16 February 2007 - 17:19
Originally posted by slapstick
If the goal is to make F1 greener imitating sun on the race tracks is not such a good idea.


#6
Posted 16 February 2007 - 17:23
Originally posted by HP
The goal is to make more money. That's why it has been suggested a while to hold a night race in Malaysia. There might be more people at the track.
No kidding, but I'm with slapstick on this one - we have F1 ranting about being more "green" and more "environmentally friendly" and then let's have a night race, ya that makes sense.
#7
Posted 16 February 2007 - 17:24
I can't believe that people still fall for such arguments. Power companies in many countries produce too much power after regular work hours. Those companies will be happy to find customers in order to not produce power nobody wants.Originally posted by SirSaltire
Very true! Just think of all the power used!
![]()
#8
Posted 16 February 2007 - 17:31
Originally posted by HP
I can't believe that people still fall for such arguments. Power companies in many countries produce too much power after regular work hours. Those companies will be happy to find customers in order to not produce power nobody wants.
But the question is - how is that power being generated? If it is generated by renewable resources (such as water or wind) then it's better than say coal generated power, but it's still light pollution and imo still goes against the image some in F1 want to start pushing - environmentally friendly.
And after experiencing that lovely blackout 3-4 years ago, it'd be nice if power companies found a way (if they haven't already) of storing that extra power "they generate after regular work hours" for backup purposes.
#9
Posted 16 February 2007 - 17:32
Would the cars need to be modified to incorporate headlights?
#10
Posted 16 February 2007 - 17:48
Originally posted by Jardins
What is the point of racing at "night" when you have floodlights everywhere to simulate daylight??? It's more difficult to see the cars at night and I don't think it would add anything to the race.
Would the cars need to be modified to incorporate headlights?
exactly
Whats the point in racing at night if its all floodlit anyway?
only cool thing about racing at night is like night stage rallys (if they still happen, not a rally fan here)
where the track is dark and the cars provide the light, then you get to extra thrill of the drivers not seeing far ahead and behind the cars you get to see the exhaust properly etc
its all a bit pointless and F1 has bigger problems to solve first
#11
Posted 16 February 2007 - 17:57
Champ Car did night races on the airport in Cleveland a few years ago, and Houston last year. The light was more than sufficient to not need headlights.Originally posted by Jardins
What is the point of racing at "night" when you have floodlights everywhere to simulate daylight??? It's more difficult to see the cars at night and I don't think it would add anything to the race.
Would the cars need to be modified to incorporate headlights?
Aside from the aforementioned increase in power usage, you'd effectively lose a day from a race weekend, unless you had it begin on Thursday. How many people would not be able to miss an extra day of work to be there?
#12
Posted 16 February 2007 - 18:00

#13
Posted 16 February 2007 - 18:07
Originally posted by slapstick
If the goal is to make F1 greener imitating sun on the race tracks is not such a good idea.
it can go "green" if they lit the cars and the track with
phosphorecent paint

#14
Posted 16 February 2007 - 18:11
No?
#15
Posted 16 February 2007 - 18:20

#16
Posted 16 February 2007 - 18:58
Originally posted by Lifew12
Has it not occured to those who question the 'point' of running Shanghai and Malaysia (the two mooted races) at night that it would move them to a more TV friendly time in the countries that watch it on the box?
No?
I think you raised a good point. If I did my work correctly, a race at 9PM in Malaysia would put it at 2pm on the UK, but it definetely it won't work for me, it would still be at 6AM.
why did I move here?
#17
Posted 16 February 2007 - 21:10
Yes it did occur to me and thats why I mentioned it at the start of the thread! Its the only good reason as far as I can see.Originally posted by Lifew12
Has it not occured to those who question the 'point' of running Shanghai and Malaysia (the two mooted races) at night that it would move them to a more TV friendly time in the countries that watch it on the box?
No?
#18
Posted 16 February 2007 - 23:33
Next thing you know, they'll be racing on a figure 8 dirt track and drinking a Bud-lite!
#19
Posted 17 February 2007 - 00:19
Originally posted by SirSaltire
Yes it did occur to me and thats why I mentioned it at the start of the thread! Its the only good reason as far as I can see.
Bernie tends to think long-term iirc, we might see the european races run under floodlights in 5 years time so they're at a better time for the far east.....
just a thought

I'm not a fan of the idea tbh, but european races with european climate on a saturday night could be....different

Advertisement
#20
Posted 17 February 2007 - 00:25
#21
Posted 17 February 2007 - 00:29
#22
Posted 18 February 2007 - 13:25
Can racing ever be considered as environmental friendly?Originally posted by rce
But the question is - how is that power being generated? If it is generated by renewable resources (such as water or wind) then it's better than say coal generated power, but it's still light pollution and imo still goes against the image some in F1 want to start pushing - environmentally friendly.
In mountainous areas, they do pump water back into the reservoir, if the power demand is low. But if the lines are overloaded that's all moot anyway. There is only one thing one can do to prevent such a situation, installing an own backup generator. Would have even helped Renault during one race last year when the monitors went black.Originally posted by rce
And after experiencing that lovely blackout 3-4 years ago, it'd be nice if power companies found a way (if they haven't already) of storing that extra power "they generate after regular work hours" for backup purposes.
But if you or anyone ever manages to truly store power, then you'd solved most power problems around the world once and for all. The energy produced in a lightning bolt for example, is enough to power an entire city for quite some time. Even if there is no lightning visible, the air is charged always. Alas until that is invented, there will be those talks about environmental impact, but as usual most politicians and people focus on the wrong side of the issue.
That's why for me the real issue about night racing is just: Does it lead to better races? 24 hours races like Le Mans would be better looked at to make an assessment, than environmental issues.
Besides that, the F1 regulations would have to get some special consideration where to mount lights on an open-wheeler, and where to get the power from? If night racing goes ahead, it would need change on the technical side of the cars. And lights would the cars need, since it's next to impossible to light an entire track consistently enough.
#23
Posted 18 February 2007 - 13:39
Yes, but the race in Malaysia and other races in (sub)tropical climate is rather brutal to be there for hours anyway, because of the sun and heat. So for the race in Malaysia, it makes all sense.Originally posted by Lifew12
Has it not occured to those who question the 'point' of running Shanghai and Malaysia (the two mooted races) at night that it would move them to a more TV friendly time in the countries that watch it on the box?
No?
#24
Posted 18 February 2007 - 13:40
Originally posted by Lifew12
Great idea. Assuming they can get the floodlighting right.
Hasn't Monza already got track lighting. I'm sure there are permanent lighting pylons every 50m or so, with their heads angled to throw their light in the direction of the racing.
#25
Posted 18 February 2007 - 13:53
Even horse racing do cause climate change with horses and all things involved in it. The cars themselves are not so major environment hazard when you consider what the whole running of F1 series or any circus of similar scale is. But sure there can be made differences whether you pollute 1x or 10x. It's always good idea to avoid producing too much rubbish and save fuel even if you keep doing your things.Originally posted by HP
Can racing ever be considered as environmental friendly?
#26
Posted 18 February 2007 - 15:24
#27
Posted 18 February 2007 - 17:09
And if it's in Sepang, pretty sure they have thunderstorms nearly every afternoon/evening at the usual time of year of the GP. Not sure if it hangs around for the night. It seems to be always cloudy during the GP weekends. Thunderstorms + night racing could be a little too much.
There is alot of reasons listed against it, some silly, some make sense.
The biggest reason I would like to see it is because it'd be something different, and would look cool! I think F1 cars could look good under lights. I like to watch all other outdoor sports at night, F1 wouldn't be any different. The onboards would be interesting. Not all the time, but occasionally would be good. They could at least try it and if it didn't work, they could kill it.
That's a good question. You'd think it'd be the same as day racing just a cooler track. But I think it would be good to see a race in those different conditions for the same reason that wet races are good. The pecking order is changed a bit, it tests the drivers in a different way and we can see something different. I think most like wet races because of the overtaking, but for me even without the overtaking it's still good to see the cars in a different way, behaving differently and testing the drivers in different circumstances. If it was planned, the night race wouldn't be a lottery either. But to answer your question, I think the race would be more interesting because it would be something new (very low temps), but overtaking mightn't be much more then usual. So to some it could be same old boring F1 dry race.That's why for me the real issue about night racing is just: Does it lead to better races?
#28
Posted 18 February 2007 - 17:40
Originally posted by HP
That's why for me the real issue about night racing is just: Does it lead to better races?
I very much doubt it will, since drivers will be tentatively more cautious in the dark. If you're behind a car and vision of what's about a hundred metres ahead is bad, you will think twice before you dare to overtake. It's a big difference with Le Mans or night races in NASCAR: driving on a circuit instead of an oval, which is more easily floodlightened and bares no surprises trackwise, and moreover really racing cars for position instead of endurance.
#29
Posted 18 February 2007 - 17:58
#30
Posted 18 February 2007 - 22:34
Hasn't Monza already got track lighting. I'm sure there are permanent lighting pylons every 50m or so, with their heads angled to throw their light in the direction of the racing.
that would be awesome as the end to the european season.
although the first corner would be.... interesting.
#31
Posted 19 February 2007 - 10:06
More dangerous then a dry race? Definately. More dangerous then a wet race? Not sure, as the visibility in the spray is very poor. Wet and night race? Could be a very dangerous combination. So I agree partly. It's tough to talk with any certainty because we haven't seen anything like this ever in F1. And I think the individual tracks lighting is a factor. It doesn't really matter what we say anyway, it will go ahead regardless, or won't go ahead regardless. But you'd have to think it's a long way away if it were to ever happen.Originally posted by WACKO
IMO racing at night makes it unnecessarily more dangerous. To me it bares no additional value. It may be exciting, but never at the expense of safety. With the speeds we're talking of in F1 added up with the fragility of the cars (compared to sports cars) it is definitely at the cost of safety. Imagine there's heavy rain and standing water on the track. You would have to suspend the race.
#32
Posted 20 February 2007 - 03:07
Musco Lighting is the company in the US that's made a business out of lighting the impossible. They can work wonders. http://www.musco.com/
#33
Posted 20 February 2007 - 09:35
Originally posted by Locai
Well, if they can light up Daytona Speedway and Burke Lakefront Airport, I would assume that they can safely light something like Sepang.
Musco Lighting is the company in the US that's made a business out of lighting the impossible. They can work wonders. http://www.musco.com/
Lighting a bowl is hardly a tricky concept.
Airports are largely set up for this to begin with and is a flat piece of land that's reletively compact in circuit terms. Sepang is twisty, hilly and considerably more difficult as a challenge.
Not to say it's impossible, but those aren't the greatest examples.
#34
Posted 20 February 2007 - 14:22
Street circuit would be mine choice
#35
Posted 20 February 2007 - 17:49
A gig for Jp in F1

Resume on it's way to FOM
Jp
#36
Posted 20 February 2007 - 18:05
Monaco would be nuts under the lights but probably a bit too dangerous.
Yes: Indy, Montreal, Melbourne, Sepang
Maybe: Bahrain, Shanghai, Brazil
No: Hungary, Silverstone, Magny Cours, Fuji, Nurburgring/Hock, Istanbul, Spa, Barcelona, Monaco
Bahrain would be pretty nuts too I think, a desert setting where it's darkness all around and then an oasis of light. Too bad the track sucks.
#37
Posted 20 February 2007 - 18:44
#38
Posted 20 February 2007 - 19:00
