
Did Prost jump the start in Suzuka 1989?
#1
Posted 03 March 2007 - 17:12
What do you think?
#3
Posted 04 March 2007 - 13:52
#4
Posted 04 March 2007 - 14:32
#5
Posted 04 March 2007 - 17:44
History is starting to show you don't know what you got until it is gone; or be careful what you wish for. JPB...come back!
Not Senna's greatest moment.
#6
Posted 04 March 2007 - 18:09
#7
Posted 04 March 2007 - 23:51
have you read the threads on the old the AtlasF1 Court DB yet? I am thinking particularly of those relating to Suzuka 1989 , Suzuka 1990 and Senna's legacy . There are also discussions regarding the FIA including one that discusses allegations of bias.
#8
Posted 05 March 2007 - 00:01
Of course JPB was a bastard, having said that what is Moseley? At worst it was hard racing, Senna
was awfully ambitious in that move; AND I am a huge Senna fan. I never met him, but I did meet Prost at Detroit the year he threw it away at Monaco; and he said basically, "I didn't make a mistake, it was a mechanical failure". Now I'm dumb, but I'm not stupid...feel free to pile on!

#9
Posted 05 March 2007 - 12:52
#10
Posted 05 March 2007 - 12:58
Originally posted by Mallory Dan
I too liked JPB, then again "Benign Dictatorship" has always appealed to me.
As opposed to the malevolent kind we get with Max Mosley (who presumably took lessons from his Dad).
#11
Posted 05 March 2007 - 13:00
#12
Posted 05 March 2007 - 13:14
You're both right in a way. I just simply wish we could go racing, and that everyone would park their egos and their agendas. Unfortunately that's just not going to happen.
At least I'm not completely alone in my madness.


#13
Posted 05 March 2007 - 13:41
#14
Posted 05 March 2007 - 14:10
#15
Posted 05 March 2007 - 14:11
Used to be amber, possibly...Spa 83...but no-one really paid notice.Originally posted by f1steveuk
(because what has to come next???)
#16
Posted 05 March 2007 - 14:48
#17
Posted 05 March 2007 - 14:51
#18
Posted 05 March 2007 - 14:52
#19
Posted 05 March 2007 - 14:57
Advertisement
#20
Posted 05 March 2007 - 15:09
for example!
#21
Posted 05 March 2007 - 15:14
Sorry, I meant they dropped the need for green cos everyone zoomed off as soon as they saw a change of some sort. I assume nowadays it's a bit easier to communicate problems cos of the electrickery. And does amber come on while the red is still on? It didn't before, certainly. Can't remember now...Originally posted by Ross Stonefeld
They have that now.
Amber was never in the start sequence. It was to stop the start.

#22
Posted 05 March 2007 - 16:26
Originally posted by ensign14
Sorry, I meant they dropped the need for green cos everyone zoomed off as soon as they saw a change of some sort. I assume nowadays it's a bit easier to communicate problems cos of the electrickery. And does amber come on while the red is still on? It didn't before, certainly. Can't remember now...
Amber was never in the start sequence. It was to stop the start.![]()
Oh I remember many happy hours drilling little holes on each string place!
I am not 100% certain how it works now, but the light rig is bigger, and includes abort lights, I suspect the abort lights would come on in conjunction with any other light, because I am sure (and I was no different) if anything changed, I'd be gone!!
Funny this has reminded me of a clip I saw of an F1 start at Brands, around 61/62 ish. The starter climbs up a nice set of steps, and half heartedly waves a flag. Whoosh go the cars, and they only just manage to get the steps yanked back out of the way, by millimetres
