Senna and his Lotus team mates
#1
Posted 27 December 1999 - 09:22
1. Why was Senna NO 12. He was the NO1 driver, so why did he not get NO 11?
2. Did Elio De Anglis leave Lotus on his own, or did Senna want him out?
3. In 1986, Senna had a driver named Johnny Dumfries as teamate. This guy did horrible, quailfying no better than 8th, and scored a might 3 points. Was it him, or the fact that Lotus proablly concentrated a great deal on Senna?
Advertisement
#2
Posted 27 December 1999 - 12:48
1. Why was Senna NO 12. He was the NO 1 driver, so why did he not get NO 11?
I think No. 11 belonged to Elio and Senna was actually Mansell's replacemnt at Lotus. I dont think the number had any bearing on the driver rank within the team.
2. Did Elio De Anglis leave Lotus on his own, or did Senna want him out?
I believe Elio left when Lotus started using Honda Engines, and Honda wanted a Japanese driver on the team in exchange for letting Lotus use their engines. Elio was actually very talanted, origionally he was thought to be very much better than Mansell.
3. In 1986, Senna had a driver named Johnny Dumfries as teamate. This guy did horrible, quailfying no better than 8th, and scored a might 3 points. Was it him, or the fact that Lotus proablly concentrated a great deal on Senna?
Probably Both. If I recall correctly Johnny was an Earl of Scotland. Pehaps he paid for the privilage of driving. (?) I am at not sure about this.
#3
Posted 27 December 1999 - 15:15
the Lotus team was hugely centred around senna, but dumfries wasn't a good f1 driver at all. after 1986 dumfries was replaced by satoru nakajima at hondas request, although nakajima wasn't good at all he was still considerably better.
after 1986 dumfries drove jaguar sportscars and ended up winning LeMans in 1988, as co-driver to andy wallace and sometime f1 driver jan lammers.
when his father died in 1994 dumfries became one of the richest persons ever to have ever competed in f1, he inherited the title of 'Marquess of Bute'
i wouldn't be surprised if senna told lotus to get rid of d angelis, as he obviuosly had a say in who got the n2 at lotus (he blocked derek warwick from driving, saying they didn't have the resources to run a proper 2 car team, with 2 top drivers.)
but i actually think de angelis left lotus because he was a bit despirited that senna dominated him in terms of speed straight from the outset and that by the seasons end senna was firm favourite in the team recieving all the attention. de angelis had always been equal n1 with mansell and scored lotus' only win during thier 5 years with them.
actually de angelis did pretty well in 1985, even though he couldn't keep up with senna (esp in Q sessions) he was far more consistent and reliable and finished not too many pts behind.
[This message has been edited by DAT (edited 12-27-1999).]
#4
Posted 28 December 1999 - 11:07
------------------
"If ignorance is bliss, then knock the smile off my face."
-Zack de la Rocha
#5
Posted 28 December 1999 - 11:45
Main Entry: mar·quess
Pronunciation: 'mär-kw&s
Variant(s): or mar·quis /'mär-kw&s, mär-'kE/
Function: noun
Inflected Form(s): plural mar·quess·es or mar·quis·es /-kw&-s&z/; or mar·quis /-'kE(z)/
Etymology: Middle English marquis, markis, from Middle French marquis, alteration of marchis, from marche march
Date: 14th century
1 : a nobleman of hereditary rank in Europe and Japan
2 : a member of the British peerage ranking below a duke and above an earl
- mar·quess·ate /'mär-kw&-s&t/ or mar·quis·ate /'mär-kw&-z&t, -s&t/ noun
------------------
Regards,
Dennis David
Yahoo = dennis_a_david
Life is racing, the rest is waiting
Grand Prix History
www.ddavid.com/formula1/
#6
Posted 04 January 2000 - 06:03
As to how Johnny Dumfries, who was a bit of a plonker got the Lotus seat. Lotus originally had intended to sign Derek Warwick to partner Senna in 86. Senna objected to this saying that Lotus didn't have the resources to support 2 front line drivers. This caused quite a stir in the British media at the time. The Brits were upset saying that Senna felt threatened by Warwick and didn't want a teammate who might challenge him, although the thought of Mr Warwick being anywhere near Senna's times is a stretch. Dumfries got the ride because he had big bucks and also he was hired to please the British and probably John Player too. In retrospect, Senna was right because Lotus only had 1 more good year, 87, then when Senna left, the long slide into oblivion began.
#7
Posted 04 January 2000 - 07:30
------------------
"Hey there, all you middle men
Throw away your fancy clothes
And while you're out there sittin' on a fence
So get off your ass and come down here
'Cause rock 'n' roll ain't no riddle man
To me it makes good, good sense"
-Brian Johnson
#8
Posted 06 November 2001 - 19:53
#9
Posted 06 November 2001 - 22:11
Capelli, I know well, but Allesandro Santin............?????
#10
Posted 06 November 2001 - 22:28
#11
Posted 07 November 2001 - 01:48
Originally posted by LittleChris
I also seem to remember that Capelli won the championship from Dumfries 2nd despite rumours about the airbox being illegal on Capelli's car ( Coloni run ? )
Yes I believe Capelli was run by Coloni in Euro F3, who later came to F1.
#12
Posted 07 November 2001 - 06:09
Dumfries got the ride because he had big bucks
Johnny Dumfries, who was a bit of a plonker
He didn't pay for that ride! He got the seat because he was British and had lots of talent. That Senna made most of his teammates look like plonkers is another matter. De Angelis was also from a rich family and he didn't pay either. Ride buyers and plonkers was not Lotus style.
#13
Posted 07 November 2001 - 06:17
Don't forget, Johnny won Le Mans for Jaguar in 1988, and was also a full-time driver for them in the WSC that year. And Tom was never known to put plonkers in his lead cars...
For more information on Johnny Dumfries, check the 8W site. I'm sure he appeared in one of the more recent quizzes.
#14
Posted 07 November 2001 - 07:59
#15
Posted 07 November 2001 - 17:24
Originally posted by Barry Boor
Quote: "Above Ivan Capelli and Allesandro Santin."
Capelli, I know well, but Allesandro Santin............?????
Sandro Santin was Italian F3 champion in 84, Capelli European - and yes Capelli did have a bent car by all accounts. Johnny D was pretty talented by all accounts... Bernard Santal is the guy thats being confused here - he was a swiss guy who raced in French f3 mid 80s.
#16
Posted 14 December 2001 - 19:31
Gugelmin had won the British F3 championship in 1985, so he was more or less ready for F1 in 1986.
Sury
#17
Posted 15 December 2001 - 02:01
#18
Posted 15 December 2001 - 03:29
#19
Posted 15 December 2001 - 23:22
Advertisement
#20
Posted 23 December 2001 - 06:39
In 1986, John Player Special, title sponsor of Team Lotus, wanted a British driver. They originally selected Derek Warwick, but after Ayrton Senna quickly vetoed Warwick, a replacement in the form of Johnny Dumfries was hastily selected.
As with many of Senna's teammates, Dumfries produced no threat to Senna at all. He was clearly out of his league, and while Senna would win pole position after pole postion, Dumfries never made it on to the grid higher than 8th. In fact he even DNQ'd at Monaco. He did, though, manage a couple of decent performances that landed him in the points, with a 5th at Hungry and a 6th in Australia, just enough to not get a full biography on this site. With JPS pulling out at the end of the season, there was no reason to keep Dumfries, and he later on found a home in sports car racing.
In 1988, Dumfries won the 24 Hours of Le Mans driving a TWR Jaguar V12. He was certainly more suited to sports cars than to Formula One.
I casually found some information about Earl Dumfries on this interesting page -which is rather telling, I fear ;)
http://f1rejects.cro...ucky/index.html
#21
Posted 23 December 2001 - 13:23
He then wasn't allowed to use Senna's spare car...
#22
Posted 14 July 2009 - 23:16
#23
Posted 15 July 2009 - 11:37
Dumfries was linked to race seats at Brabham, Tyrrell, Ferrari (3rd car, 4 cylinder) and Toleman - not too shabby I would say. That he ended up barely having a few F3000 races with Onyx and Lola because of a lack of dough showed he didnt then have access to family money. He was rumoured to be recieving backing from ROthmans and BP for 85 but both fell through, or else he would have probably been in the (difficult) Brabham. If he had it might have been his desultory 86 experience a year early I would wager. Dumfries was THE standout F3 driver of 1984, no question - he obliterated the opposition EVERYWHERE.
Yeah but he wasn't up against much was he Ghinzy, with the benefit of hindsight.
#24
Posted 15 July 2009 - 12:58
#25
Posted 15 July 2009 - 13:04
Hmm - Capelli, Berger, Neilsen, Davy Jones, Claudio Langes, Allen Berg, Spence, Radisich, Campos. Some in not all of them werent too shabby in F3.
All perfectly true, but after that Johnny's progress seemed to have more than a touch of Jan Magnusson syndrome about it.
#26
Posted 15 July 2009 - 13:09
#27
Posted 15 July 2009 - 16:18
#28
Posted 16 July 2009 - 00:00
If so, even hinting that he's a plonker is offside in the extreme.
Edited by Manfred Cubenoggin, 16 July 2009 - 00:00.