
Why do you think Michael Schumacher cried when asked about his 41st victory?
#1
Posted 11 September 2000 - 00:53
Pressure was also coming from his rivals, especially Mika Hakkinen who had his share of misfortune and pressures at the start of the season, but who was now inching his way into Michael Schumacher's early championship lead. In a Marathon, there is more pain in being caught at the end of the race than of losing the lead of the race at the beginning.
As if to put the dagger in MS's heart, Hakkinen's specular pass at Spa in the last laps of the race, could only lead to more psychological pressure on Schumacher. Had he been trusted with too much? Is he really better than Hakkinen or has he been fooling us all, all this time? The quick tongues were eager to point out immediately that Michael didn't have what it took to be world champion this year. Yet those with better memories and common sense (including Mika Hakkinen, his main rival), were confident that what had happened to Michael Schumacher since Canada 2000 had nothing to do with his immense talent. They were certain that given the right opportunity and some luck, he would challenge for the lead and demonstrate once again why he has been the most electrifying driver in F1 since Ayrton Senna.
As Michael sat there in the Italian press room, he thought of all the pressure that had built insinde of him and that he had tried for 4 months, to keep in check. He felt relief for having delivered a crucial win, not only for his own championship aspirations, but to the many, many people in his entourage, on the Monza track and around the world who have cheered for him. Cheers which he feeds on. At some point during the weekend, he also thought about the fact that it was his first Italian GP since his win in 1998. This obviously led to him remembering that last year, he had missed the Monza race because he had broken his leg in an accident at Silverstone. An accident that could have killed him had a stray tire or a simple piece of suspension, flown back towards his well protected cockpit. Ayrton Senna was not as fortunate...
Michael must have thought during the first lap of Monza 2000, driving behind the pace car: " I must keep my tires warm...don't lose too much tire pressure... remember Imola 94...". Just like Imola in 1994, there was a massive crash right after the start, which unfortunately saw the life of an official taken away. Just like Imola 94, the remaining cars drove behind the pace car for several laps at temperatures and revs unfamiliar to modern F1 cars. Just like Imola 94, the favorite was under pressure to win the race in order to have a shot at keeping his chances of winning the world title. Just like Imola 94, the favorite was behind the pace car and leading the race. But unlike Imola 94, Michael Schumacher was fortunate enough to finish the race...
So as he was asked in the pressroom what significance his record tying 41st victory to the great Ayrton Senna, meant to him...he just bow his head and cried. Ayrton Senna...a man Michael Schumacher respected a lot, admired and that he saw handle the same kind of pressure ( that he has had this year) with dignity, pride and perserverance. A man that many including Michael Schumacher himself, feel to this day that he would, could and should have gone on to win more victories and become the All-time winningest F1 driver, had he been luckier on that fateful May 1, 1994 at Imola. A man that Michael Schumacher was following at Imola 94 and that he saw inexplicably vire off to the right at Tamburello...
Michael Schumacher is proud to drive for Ferrari, proud to have won at Monza, glad to be back in championship hunt and glad to have won again after 5 races without a win. But perhaps what he felt more than anything was...grateful.
Note: Mika Hakkinen understood Michael's feeling and offered his support. I think he too was emotional because he realized that the Universal TV interviewer failed completly to understand the emotional value of the moment. The interviewer line of questioning was rude and down right very unprofessional. Hence, the "silence treatment" he recieved from both Michael Schumacher and Mika Hakkinen. FIA MUST find someone else to fill-in the job, otherwiase every post race interviwe will be as akward and uncomfortable as the Monza one was.
Wembi
Advertisement
#2
Posted 11 September 2000 - 01:16

But as you say, we'll never really know...
#3
Posted 11 September 2000 - 01:30
The interviewer was only doing his job, Wembi, I don't think you should be too hard on him. Schumi is a professional racing driver, so the line of questioning was not really to be unexpected. I must admit it was surprising to see just how emotional Schumacher was, and it must have been difficult to deal with the questions.
#4
Posted 11 September 2000 - 01:59
#5
Posted 11 September 2000 - 02:17
#6
Posted 11 September 2000 - 03:40
#7
Posted 11 September 2000 - 08:54
Being back in the WC running, in front of his (half)home crowd (there was a thread called "is MS italian" or something that I found interesting), putting an end to a stream of bad luck... well that's enough to make someone sob.
Then you add the exhaustion, the relief of finishing the race, the fact that he was alone to finish the race - without barricello support-
then of course the record...
bah, he cried, so what... Mika did the same last year for other reasons
I did a kart race last saturday and was going pretty fast, gaining place like 2 or 3 per lap, then another lame driver pushed me in the grass and as a result I the front bumper was touching the ground. I had to stop for repairs and lost a few places... DAMN I WAS ABOUT TO CRY!!!!
and there was no title, no cup, I wasn't even running for the first place....
Just the competition spirit
#8
Posted 11 September 2000 - 08:54
That wimp ruined Jenson Buttons race!
;)
#9
Posted 11 September 2000 - 09:31
#10
Posted 11 September 2000 - 13:33
Well put, Mason, I have been most impressed by both MS and MH over the last few races. Really showing respect for each other, which is great to see.
#11
Posted 11 September 2000 - 13:50
...
Was it to steal the Italians hearts at last? who know's? ?? Or is it to get equal with Mika & Rubens? Let's ALL cry once? Who knows? Was it arrogant doing so while asking that question particulairy? Who knows? Why DID he cry? Emotion? Happiness? Sadness?
Let us put in the beginning of this IN FRONT of us that Senna's record was not complete . ... . and that's kinda unfair to put a more than statistical figure behind it....
#12
Posted 11 September 2000 - 14:07
Originally posted by Frans MSH
Was it to steal the Italians hearts at last? who know's? ?? Or is it to get equal with Mika & Rubens? Let's ALL cry once? Who knows? Was it arrogant doing so while asking that question particulairy?
Yeah, that's it. He was faking to get people on his side, is that right Frans?

#13
Posted 11 September 2000 - 14:18

"Oh, *sniff sniff* I'm SOOOOOooooooo good man!" *sniff sniff* "Incredible"
"sniff" SNiff"
.
#14
Posted 11 September 2000 - 14:26
Its great to see 2 great drivers respecting each other and their feelings unlike DC who just opens his mouth.
#15
Posted 11 September 2000 - 16:37
This thread and this subject are entirely speculative. Only MS can know why he cried, and even he may not understand quite how it happened - he may have been as surprised and baffled as we were. It's one thing to slam Frans for his doctored pictures of "cheating aids", but on this subject we are all equally in the dark. No opinion can be summarily dismissed just because it seems mean-spirited. Voltaire put it best, something to the effect of "I disagree with what you're saying, but I will defend to the death your right to say it." Let's keep our tolerance - especially for topics that are not open to logical or informed analysis. [p][Edited by dopesmuggler on 09-11-2000]
#16
Posted 11 September 2000 - 16:44
It's kind of like Al Gore at the Democratic Convention in the U.S.
Here's a guy (Gore) whose image is that he's a wooden personality, and whose party is struggling to make a break from Clinton's legacy.
So Gore plants a big one on Tipper on National TV, with millions of viewers watching.
Instantly, his popularity (amongst Women voters particularly) shoots up. He is now a caring romantic guy who loves his wife.
Move forward to September 10.
Michael is the ego maniac who cares little about anything but himself.
Spontaneously getting emotional at the post race press conference.
Instantly, he is human again. We feel for him because he is a sensitive man.
Lets have a look at how his popularity goes up now!!
#17
Posted 11 September 2000 - 18:01
because of the pressure (one more WD title would have been
a dream

My only point is why people did not make this kind of
comments when Mika had this kind of reaction last year?
MS's popularity will grow even more now, while after
Mika's reaction everyone characterized him as a "crybaby",
who can not handle the pressure and that he should quit

They are both HUMANS and very good drivers, and that's all!
#18
Posted 11 September 2000 - 18:53
You don't pick moments like that to break down, they pick you.
#19
Posted 11 September 2000 - 19:05
#21
Posted 11 September 2000 - 22:10
In any case, I think that it was a grueling day in general and it got the best of him. I thought mika's answer to the reporter "give me a break" was great. The respect between these 2 drivers is amazing to see. Speaking of the reporter - sometimes I wonder what his IQ is. What kind of question is "do you think Michael won because he had the faster car?" DUH!!! His answer was perfect - "a little bit. not much, but enough" Great stuff!! how can people say he's boring??
BTW, I also agree with some sentiments posted here. I find it sad that some posters will stoop sssooooo low to bash drivers. Grow UP!!
#22
Posted 12 September 2000 - 04:13
hey, Frans, I think the new performance-enhancing drugs MS is using these days causes extreme & unpredictable mood swings!!

har har!
#23
Posted 12 September 2000 - 05:59
Q. Can you explain why this win means so much to you?
MS: It's obvious why. We are here in Italy. We obviously were in some difficulty in the last races where we haven't been as competitive as we wished to be for whatever reason, and we are back on the road which I think we showed very obvious overall weekend. It's my 41st victory, and the crowd outside just has been amazing. I mean, it's much more than it has been in '98, and it's, I don't know why, but it's simply a lot more, it came a lot more close to me, and it's different. It's difficult to put into words.
Q. Is it a relief that you are back at the front again?
MS: For sure, although I am not at the front. I'm two points behind but now, obviously, we are back on the road for victories. It is a certain relief.
Q. Was your emotional response anything to do with Senna?
MS: I think at certain moments not all questions you care [to put] or which you would like to be answered will be answered. I don't like to go into the detail of this question.
#24
Posted 12 September 2000 - 06:57
I do not wanna be rude or something, but I only can think of this is Schumacher's ultimate dream....... going past the best.... statisticly................ He dreamed of this since... well, since 94 I guess... maybe earlier, but earlier he had no right thinking that of course... and no real change thinking/hoping that.
And what he seems to FORGET, is that Senna's record is a incomplete one, ......
But I think this is where Schumacher lives for.... trying to put his name next to HIS!!!!
Why did Schumacher cry? Was it real? Was it fake?
It's still a shame the race wasn't restarted,,,,.....
But we can clearly say, this season will get tight..... and maybe, let me put it like this: MAYBE, Schumacher isn't gonna be able to take it anymore.....
The pressure has come to him...... he never EVER had such pressure as now.. never.. this is ALL new to him.. nobody can say if he's gonna make it, win it, but losing it is more reasonable, according the past couple of years, statisticly..........
;)
#25
Posted 12 September 2000 - 07:40
and.....excellent post wembi. ncie stuff. And I agree with all you are saying. It was a real shock to see MS break-down like that, and I don't think Mika and Ralf new what to do with themselves. Mika was a great man through all of that, you can see Shuey and Mika have a lot of respect for one another. And Ralf, I think he was completely surprised, he tried his best to answer the questions, but you could see his main focus was on Michael.
And of the interviewer. I don't know. He is just doign his job, but I think it is time they got someone a lot more less formal. Someone who get me a bit more laid back and get better answers from the drivers. Liek what we had with Senna, let the drivers feel more comfortable and they will be more relaxed answer a lot more quesitons in depth.
Mat
#26
Posted 12 September 2000 - 09:10
It came to me and it's crytal clear..........
Schumacher didn't believe he DID win a race LEGALLY! "Sjeeez" he must have thought, "I CAN win without traction control" ..... "What a relief!" "Bohoooooohooo" "sniff" "sniff" "incredible I am, yes?" "sniff" sniff"
And then he broke ..... he did....
So .. .. this must be clear for everybody now, yes?
#27
Posted 12 September 2000 - 10:05

Actual quote from Micheal picked up through audio enhancement of the tape. "i'm going to get that &%(%$ing Frans, he so unfair to me, sniff, i'm going to tie his *&&%^$%# xxxxs to my diffuser and take him for a tour of Monza"
#28
Posted 12 September 2000 - 10:13
#29
Posted 12 September 2000 - 10:16

#30
Posted 12 September 2000 - 17:14


#31
Posted 12 September 2000 - 23:27
#32
Posted 12 September 2000 - 23:41
#33
Posted 13 September 2000 - 06:39
........
no comparisson/...
& it seems he cheated anyway most of his victory's... so what the hell he's crying anyway?

And face it.... not commenting about it makes him more flexible by "thinking" off an reason afterwards.
doesn't it?
#34
Posted 13 September 2000 - 06:41
#35
Posted 13 September 2000 - 06:50
Shaun
#36
Posted 13 September 2000 - 07:00
#37
Posted 13 September 2000 - 07:06
#38
Posted 13 September 2000 - 07:22
strange you dont mind me saying senna dominated the early 90s though ;)
(dbltop, lol)
Shaun
#39
Posted 13 September 2000 - 07:31
I could have not said it any better. And to many others:
" If you can't say something nice, don't say anything at all.
Best regards, Gudrun
Advertisement
#40
Posted 13 September 2000 - 09:03
When MS cried he did not know about the death of fireman
41st victory is a reason to cry?
Or so many yeras after Senna's death he bacame very touchy?
Come on.
I know that the same people that are attaching Mika last year after his tears in Monza are defending now MS saying that he is showing his human character. But for them Mika was a pussy.
Come on
Double criteria of its ugliest kind.
Nice move from MS on the flying start?
Great isn't it?
But watching the replay: he slowed down, pushed very hard and than slowed strongly again. Why he slowed down twice? Is that OK?
Yes for FIA and MS fans of course.
#41
Posted 13 September 2000 - 09:19
one freaking single year he was dominant.
and you're saying he was dominant in the 90's. You make me laugh. Silly gorl.
ONE YEAR dominant, and sjeeeez he's the best, right!?!?? The late 90's are dominated untill today by one single man: Mika Hakkinen. sorry to say so SHAUN!!!
And indeed, the REASON where Schumacher cried for is simply to PATETIC to even take it seriously, it was to win the symphaty of the tifosi, and sjeeeeeezus.
anyway, if he thinks he can cry himself to the title, well He can watch strangly at the end....
ANyway, cheers
#42
Posted 13 September 2000 - 09:28
Michael Schumacher has said he burst into tears at the Italian Grand Prix press conference because he was so relieved to get his championship challenge back on course.
Television viewers were stunned to see the usually calm and collected German dissolve into floods of tears when he was asked what the victory – his first since June – meant to him. The win also meant Schumacher equalled Ayrton Senna’s record of 41 grand prix wins. Only Alain Prost with 51 has more.
Schumacher explained: "It's obvious why this win means so much. We're in Italy, we have had problems in the last few races when we have not been as competitive as we would wish to be, but we're back on the road.
“Although I am not in front in the championship, this win is a big relief. There's no doubt about that.
“It's my 41st victory and it goes to the amazing fans, who I feel so much closer to, and to the usual 500 people at Ferrari involved in trying to make me world champion again.”
He cried for his victory and "shot" for his title.....
"Booohoooooo, sniff sniff ...trying to make me world champion again. snikk snick" <<< WHAT A REASON TO CRY!
I know some other "organisations" etc. who are trying TO MAKE him worldchamp again.................... starts with an F, ends on a A and in the middle there's a I ........
#43
Posted 13 September 2000 - 09:31
did damon hill dominate f1 ever? no he didnt, but he won the champ in 96. did jacques or mansell dominate? no. one driver has been right at the top level of f1 every year since 1993 while others have come and gone. only one. that is dominance. senna and prost dominated f1. schumacher has been the dominant driver of he last 6-8 years. at least accept this.
Shaun
#44
Posted 13 September 2000 - 10:32
NO
in 97 not classified, in 96 not in top 2? ok in 98 2nd in 99 not in top 3 even, and '00 :::: we have to see.
deserved 94? NO, not by ramming! NEVER!
95 > that was dominance, just like MANSELL DID dominance in 92, and HILL in 96 and Hakkinen 98 99 and hopefully, let's hope it for the SPORT > 2000 ALSO!
#45
Posted 13 September 2000 - 11:09