
1950s helmet & goggles manufacturers
#1
Posted 13 May 2007 - 11:21
Advertisement
#2
Posted 13 May 2007 - 11:34
http://www.herbert-j...uk/history.html
Moss, Fangio, Brooks and many others wore Herbert Johnson helmets.
#3
Posted 13 May 2007 - 12:39
#4
Posted 13 May 2007 - 13:24
Regards
#5
Posted 13 May 2007 - 20:58
Of course the passage of 40+ years and ever advancing anno domino might be misleading! I also recall buying some one piece rubber framed goggles a la 1960s F1, plastic rather than glass (the sort worn by Clark, Surtees, Hill et al) that were typically protected against stones, debris etc., by black tape on the upper part of the lens.
These were American tank style and I think were branded Trackstar.
Anyway it is all a very long time ago so apologies if I have got it wrong.
#6
Posted 13 May 2007 - 22:32
cheers marty


#7
Posted 13 May 2007 - 23:17
#8
Posted 14 May 2007 - 01:45

Before Dupont de Nemours as it was then called, invented aramid and polyamid synthetic fibers that became Nomex, other companies such as Goodyear tried aluminized racing suits as well as cotton or wool dipped in boric acid.
Only one problem with both: they restrict greatly the ability to the human body to perspire, causing hyperthermia rather quickly. So most drivers just ignored them, and when Dave MacDonald and Eddie Sachs died of terrible burns at the 1965 Indy 500, things began to change. Slowly.
Thanks God for some modern racing suits that have at last, resolved both problems, that of the ability to evacuate perspiration without quitting, and provide adequate fire protection.
The best period American helmets were actually not the Bell but the Buco, that offered better energy absorbtion as shown by period early Snell testing. The best racing suit at the time was made in Indianapolis by the Hinchman company, and was worn pretty much by all the Brits who visited the Speedway and returned home with both Buco helmets and Hinchman suits. Clark, Hill, Brabham, were wearing those while Surtees and Bandini were faithful to Les Leston's or "Dunlop" cotton suits...
#9
Posted 14 May 2007 - 05:00
Only, the Toptex (a Police motorcycle design) passed the test due mainly to the non-resilient liner which absorbed impact rather than transmitting it to the skull. The others all had too soft a liner.
Bell. Minor skull fracture. Design being revised.
Gentex. Severe skull fractures. Also being changed.
Cromwell. Affords NO protection. Severe skull fractures.
Anderson. The shell was too weak to withstand sudden impacts.
McHal. Does not absorb shock.
Machpi. Nine skull fractures.
The editorial in the same issue mentions that the Machpi had been banned in the SCCA New england region. Also mentioned is that three of the helmet manufacturers are recalling their product for re-lining with non-resilient foam plastic.
Aviation and tank goggles were generally available in Military Surplus shops. AN spec, Willson, Fischer and Polaroid.
#10
Posted 14 May 2007 - 11:48
I thought it was earlier, but you have it in front of you. The tests were hugely controversial, and covered at great length in the various magazines (as covered in the late Bob Norton's collection). As ever with safety developments, many people criticised the need, the motives and the results.Originally posted by Gerr
The July 1957 issue of SCI has an article by Dr. George Snively on the first Pete Snell Memorial Fund tests
I may be wrong, working from memory), but I recall that Bell put up much of the money for the tests, which some found suspicious. I'm also pretty sure that Bell didn't just modify their design - they deleted the model and bought the Toptex design.
Fifty years on, Snively's work proved spot on. The principles of a rigid shell and deformable liner have barely been improved.
#11
Posted 14 May 2007 - 14:22
I taped mine off at the top to cut down on sun glare. I started out wearing the split lens aces-high type goggles, but the inexpensive rubber one piece goggles with their replaceable lenses were much more practical. And besides, somebody stole mye split lens goggles in the paddock (and I would like them back, please).
#12
Posted 14 May 2007 - 14:35
Lew Hinchman was a friend of mine. Despite what Bill Simpson likes to say, Lew put the first Nomex suits on race car drivers (IIRC, 1965). Lew was an eccentric but generous fellow. My wife was given a suit by Andy Granatelli of STP for our SCCA racing and when I went with her to Hinchman's Indianapolis shop for her custom fitting, Lew asked me what I had for my own suit. I'd been given a suit by Lee Kunzman, one of his old spare ones, but Lew wouldn't have any of that: he made me a suit to match my wife's, gratis. This represented no small amount of $ to a poor racer in those days. This began a life long friendship with Lew and his wife Bert, both of whom have alas left the building.
Hinchman suits were far superior to anything else on the market, fit wonderfully, and looked great. Lew often replaced damaged suits without charge, or made free repairs. He was friend to many racers. Ultimately he had a falling out with Goodyear, who bought many suits from him, and he slowly became a second tier provider. He was never much interested in building a bigger company than he had, saying that it had given him everything he wanted, and he didn't want to have to work harder just to pay more taxes.
#13
Posted 14 May 2007 - 15:13
Not including the helmet situation until the early 1990's, the true driver's personal-equipment safety advancements since the mid 1970's have been done in France, not in Torrance or Indianapolis.
#14
Posted 14 May 2007 - 19:04