
Mike Hailwood
#1
Posted 05 June 2007 - 14:48
It seems unbelievable that SMBH could come back and achieve what he did not only after after such a long lay off but after suffering a career ending crash in F1. He seems forgotten now in the car world.
If he had stuck with F1 in the 60's do you think he would have been a more serious contender for GP honours ?
Advertisement
#2
Posted 05 June 2007 - 16:38

#3
Posted 05 June 2007 - 21:52
#4
Posted 05 June 2007 - 22:00
#5
Posted 05 June 2007 - 22:09
So why does the first post say "in the '60s"?Originally posted by Gary C
er.............I think we're talking AFTER 1974 here, Bjorn.

#6
Posted 05 June 2007 - 22:27
#7
Posted 06 June 2007 - 07:30

#8
Posted 06 June 2007 - 08:52

#9
Posted 06 June 2007 - 15:06
Originally posted by Bjørn Kjer
To my knowledge , no one else than Mike can show such a unique feat : World champion on 2 wheeels, then proving a point on 4 wheels , back to 2 wheels and world champion , then winning on 4 wheels,retirement due to crash and then winning again on 2 wheels !
Surtees remains, I believe, the only person ever to be world champion on 2 wheels and on 4.
World champion at Grand Prix level in both disciplines, I mean - no doubt there is someone, somewhere (probably in USA), who has been world champion on 2, 4, 6 and 8 wheels - and equally without doubt someone on TNF will know his name, whereabouts and the tyre pressures on which he won his titles.

#10
Posted 06 June 2007 - 18:27
Originally posted by Gary C
ah! slopes off to bed....................



#11
Posted 06 June 2007 - 19:42
With regards his F1 career, I think his biggest problem was his inability to set a car up propelry, and while he was not the only talented driver to experience this problem, he was never able to secure a seat in a team that had the ability to overcome this shortcoming. Also, I think he changed to 4 wheel far to late in his career. Maybe if he had made the switch 7 or 8 years earlier, things would have turned out far differently.
#12
Posted 06 June 2007 - 19:50
#13
Posted 06 June 2007 - 19:53
Unlikely for him to have made the switch when he was 15 or 16, which was his age 7 or 8 years before he took to four wheels in 1963Originally posted by ex Rhodie racer
Also, I think he changed to 4 wheel far to late in his career. Maybe if he had made the switch 7 or 8 years earlier, things would have turned out far differently.
#14
Posted 06 June 2007 - 20:25
OK he may not have won or dominated in every discipline but.....He was a Contender, as they say in some other sport.
And a great bloke too !
#15
Posted 06 June 2007 - 21:00

cars never seemed to have the right driver for a superb set , and win ! Could have been the cars , see post 2/3

#16
Posted 06 June 2007 - 21:55
Originally posted by David McKinney
Unlikely for him to have made the switch when he was 15 or 16, which was his age 7 or 8 years before he took to four wheels in 1963
Born in 1940, Mike was essentially a bike racer, and his real entry into car racing was after his official retirement from bikes at the end of 1967, the year he won both the 250 and 350 world titles. In other words, 1968. The car racing he did before that was simply foot in the water stuff, and not a serious attempt to establish himself, so I don´t count his involvement in cars until 1968 . He won his first world motorcycle championship in 1961, so I stand by my original statement, give or take a year or two. It´s interesting to note that Mike, like a lot of ex motorcycle racers, disliked the people involved in car racing, and I think , to a large extent, he has been dismissed because of his outspoken feelings in that regard.
#17
Posted 06 June 2007 - 22:20
To my personal knowledge Mike was HUGELY popular and highly regarded within the four-wheeled racing world once his initial honeymoon phase of 1962-63 was past. He certainly found people he didn't particularly warm to within the car world, but from some of his stories there were certainly people within the motorcycle world who were not on his Christmas card list either... Within serious Formula 1, Formula 2, Formula 5000 and endurance racing Mike the Bike was very welcome. One thing's for darned sure...if he hadn't enjoyed it, he would NOT have stayed in it...
DCN
#18
Posted 07 June 2007 - 05:03

#19
Posted 07 June 2007 - 06:43
This, I take it, is your reply to the question asked in the original post? And your earlier post a red herring?Originally posted by ex Rhodie racer
The car racing he did before that was simply foot in the water stuff, and not a serious attempt to establish himself, so I don´t count his involvement in cars until 1968.
Advertisement
#20
Posted 07 June 2007 - 08:29
Quote- Sorry - I don't think that's necessarily true - it smacks of chip on shoulder us-poor-common-motorcyclists resentment.
Doug, as I was a personal friend of Mike´s, I know it was exactly that type of sentiment that turned him off certain people in car racing. Motorcycle racers are not common, and certainly don´t think of themselves as such. so why on earth would you imagine they carry a chip on their shoulders?
I, like many Southern Africans grew up in an environment where bikes and cars shared the programme, and the only resentment I felt during my bike years ( I also raced cars later BTW) was from certain, not all, members of the car racing fraternity who somehow, and for whatever reason, felt "superiour" in some way to their motorcycle racing counterparts. God only knows why.
You weren´t one of them I hope ?;)
Mr McKinney, with all due respects sir, may I point out that just because someone doesn´t entirely agree with you, and during the course of a discussion drifts slightly off topic, it doesn´t mean they are fishing. However, I will make every effort in future to confine myself to the topic, the whole topic and nothing but the topic, and I apologize for any distress I might have caused you.

#21
Posted 07 June 2007 - 09:04
Originally posted by Doug Nye
To my personal knowledge Mike was HUGELY popular and highly regarded within the four-wheeled racing world once his initial honeymoon phase of 1962-63 was past. He certainly found people he didn't particularly warm to within the car world, but from some of his stories there were certainly people within the motorcycle world who were not on his Christmas card list either...
DCN
Rhodie - so where precisely was I wrong to report the above???
DCN
#22
Posted 07 June 2007 - 09:10
And with respects to you, too, RhodieOriginally posted by ex Rhodie racer
Mr McKinney, with all due respects sir, may I point out that just because someone doesn´t entirely agree with you, and during the course of a discussion drifts slightly off topic, it doesn´t mean they are fishing. However, I will make every effort in future to confine myself to the topic, the whole topic and nothing but the topic, and I apologize for any distress I might have caused you.![]()
My comments had nothing to do with agreeing with anyone - it just seemed that you had missed the point of the thread.
The first post ended with:
"If he had stuck with F1 in the 60s do you think he would have been a more serious contender for GP honours?"
Your first post said:
"I think he changed to 4 wheel far to late in his career. Maybe if he had made the switch 7 or 8 years earlier, things would have turned out far differently."
I was merely following on from that
#23
Posted 07 June 2007 - 10:02
Originally posted by Doug Nye
Sorry - I don't think that's necessarily true - it smacks of chip on shoulder us-poor-common-motorcyclists resentment.
To my personal knowledge Mike was HUGELY popular and highly regarded within the four-wheeled racing world once his initial honeymoon phase of 1962-63 was past. He certainly found people he didn't particularly warm to within the car world, but from some of his stories there were certainly people within the motorcycle world who were not on his Christmas card list either... Within serious Formula 1, Formula 2, Formula 5000 and endurance racing Mike the Bike was very welcome. One thing's for darned sure...if he hadn't enjoyed it, he would NOT have stayed in it...
DCN

Spot on I would say.
#24
Posted 07 June 2007 - 10:07
Originally posted by David McKinney
"If he had stuck with F1 in the 60s do you think he would have been a more serious contender for GP honours?"
Yes I do, but only if he had managed to get a drive with a team that could compensate for his lack of set up skills. Mike had the same problem on 2 wheels, the only difference being, he was able to ride around the problems thanks to his extraordinary skills, something that simply was not possible on 4 wheels.
Doug, basically, other than your opening statement, you are correct. However, and I apologize for going off topic for a moment, I think if we are honest with each other here, there has always been a snobby element in car racing who tend to look down their noses at the 2 wheel world. As I have already said, I don´t understand why, but having been a part of both, I can vouch for this. Valentiono Rossi cited this as one of the reasons he decided to stay on 2 wheels instead of joining F1, and I know Mike had similar reservations.
#25
Posted 07 June 2007 - 11:50
I think that's trueOriginally posted by ex Rhodie racer
there has always been a snobby element in car racing who tend to look down their noses at the 2 wheel world
But I also think Doug's "chip on the shoulder" reference is valid
The question is, perhaps, which came first?
Material for new thread?
#26
Posted 07 June 2007 - 14:45
Originally posted by ex Rhodie racer
While I don´t wish to take anything away from Mike´s TT comeback. the TT in his comeback year was no longer a world (GP level) championship. It was nothing more than a gloryfied international race and must be seen in that context. It might have had "W/C" status, but I think everyone would agree, it wasn´t at GP level. Mike would have been run over at the top level, and I am sure he would have been the first to admit that fact.
I disagree , Rhodie.....as a bike racing enthusiast myself - and from "the continent" , which means I have no specific over-hype about the TT as such - , I think Mike's return there was a most astounding achievement. Not so much in his much publicised 1978 TT-F1 victory aboard the Ducati, when one might to some extent consider that he rode a superior machine ( and of a "vintage" style that he may have felt easily at home on ) but still had caught and passed the man considered as the favourite, Phil Read on a factory Honda, before the latter retired . But his achievement of the year after, 1979 , was in my opinion an even greater moment : he won brilliantly the 500cc Senior TT , on a factory two-stroke, square four RG 500 Suzuki, the most modern machinery you could think of at the time, and a style of machine, engine or suspension-wise, he had never ridden before . And more significantly, he came second that same year in the Jubilee TT , on the same 500cc machine, beaten only by Alex George's factory 1000cc Honda , and leaving behind him none others than Charlie Williams, Jeff Sayle, Graeme Mc Gregor, Joey Dunlop , Chas Mortimer and Kenny Blake....all names maybe not well known of our 4-wheels specialists friends, but who were among the top brass of the time, not only on the road circuits, but also in the "short circuits" world championship . Therefore, I would have been most interested to see what Mike, on competitive machinery, could have been able to do on "normal" circuits , outside of the
Isle of Man......I do not think he would have been "run over" ....but we'll never know, so.....;)
#27
Posted 13 June 2007 - 18:09
#28
Posted 14 June 2007 - 10:21
Phillipe when Mike borrowed a Reg Dearden 500 Norton as he could not get the Honda for some reason
and outrode our short circuit guys . I remember him outbraking at least five going into the Esses and coming out in the lead. Cannot remember if he won the race though. But I am biased I thought then and still do that Mike was the best m/c racer. According to his autobiography Murray the Walker thinks the same.
#29
Posted 04 June 2009 - 20:42

#30
Posted 04 June 2009 - 21:38
edit : maybe Stu was on the island as well that year, or the year before ?
Edited by philippe7, 04 June 2009 - 21:39.
#31
Posted 05 August 2009 - 19:46
In this one Mike is talking about the end of his time with Honda. Notice how he talks about having had enough money to retire at the end of 1967, and wanting to do something else...
Here's a wonderful contrast - Mike at Spa in 1964 talking about how much he loved bike people and didn't like racing cars. It's obvious where his heart was...
The above was sent to me by Elizabeth McCarthy
Edited by Classicpics, 05 August 2009 - 19:54.
#32
Posted 07 August 2009 - 08:45
A video clip from Champions Forever on YouTube. Interviews of Mike from that film. Posted in three segments. These were all recorded on the same day in June,1973 when Mike was driving for John Surtees and was in Monaco for the GP.
In this one Mike is talking about the end of his time with Honda. Notice how he talks about having had enough money to retire at the end of 1967, and wanting to do something else...
Here's a wonderful contrast - Mike at Spa in 1964 talking about how much he loved bike people and didn't like racing cars. It's obvious where his heart was...
The above was sent to me by Elizabeth McCarthy
Thanks CP....He's strangely downbeat in the Monaco clips.........
#33
Posted 10 August 2009 - 08:13

#34
Posted 10 August 2009 - 16:33
Rhodie is absolutely spot on with his remarks.........Natural skills on/in both bikes and cars but not gifted with mechanical aptitude.

[/quote
Some riders were like that. Troy Bayliss was asked at a bbq about the Team GSE bikes and said ' I dunno, I just ride 'em' I think he said a similar thing on TV when asked what went wrong with the bike 'it broke' was the reply.:rotfl:
David
#35
Posted 10 August 2009 - 18:19
Hi David, I remember Troy Bayliss in an interview when he said 'I'm only the throttle monkey, the mechanics do all the work on the bike'
