
Stealing other people's designs
#1
Posted 14 June 2007 - 20:00
The Birel was a direct copy of Ron Tauranac's Brabham BT18.
Clint Brawner copied another Tauranac design for his Hawk.
Countless Watson style Roadsters were direct copies of AJ's original masterpiece.
We are not talking of "derived from" or "inspired by". These were blatant cribs, exact in every detail.
So: what other examples can you come up with? And why was there no attempt to protect the intellectual property rights of the original design? Did people simply turn a blind eye to such goings on, did the original designer get a royalty fee, or is there another explanation?
Advertisement
#2
Posted 14 June 2007 - 20:21
I must admit there are now Crossle spec parts on my PRS.
#3
Posted 14 June 2007 - 20:30
Although, of course, I would stop short of using the word "stealing"

#4
Posted 14 June 2007 - 21:18
And IIRC at least one of Sam Tingle's LDS cars was a Brabham clone.
#5
Posted 14 June 2007 - 21:20
When introduced to the car, Jack Brabham's reaction was far from negative, he told me. Brabhams were being copied in droves those days, Bob Britton did many copies with the full knowledge of Brabham and Tauranac.
#6
Posted 14 June 2007 - 21:39
Originally posted by alansart
My PRS RH01 was a copy of a Crossle (so I am told).
I thought the PRS RH01 resembled the Hawke DL15/17/19 series of cars after Vic Hollman left Hawke to form PRS.
#7
Posted 14 June 2007 - 21:45
.
#8
Posted 14 June 2007 - 22:04
#9
Posted 14 June 2007 - 22:25
#10
Posted 14 June 2007 - 23:16
And didn't he say that when accused of copying a Peugeot?Originally posted by Vitesse2
Louis Coatalen's 1923 Sunbeams were a blatant copy of an earlier Fiat design, so much so that they were known as Fiats in green paint. Coatalen didn't make the mistake of trying to "improve" them either, his motto being "It is a wise man who copies without altering".
#11
Posted 15 June 2007 - 00:37
Mo
#12
Posted 15 June 2007 - 01:52
Then there was the Penske PC-3, a near copy of a March 751, and the Penske PC-5, a copy of a McLaren M-24.
Lots more, as I would imagine subsequent posts will point out.
Tom
#13
Posted 15 June 2007 - 07:18
Originally posted by paulsenna1
I thought the PRS RH01 resembled the Hawke DL15/17/19 series of cars after Vic Hollman left Hawke to form PRS.
They do look similar but are totally different. I think the DL19 has inboard front suspension for example.
I did Formula E in the 80's including the Kirkistown races. Before we got the Ferry home, John Crossle would open his workshops for us all to have a look around. It was one of his guys who said the PRS was a Crossle copy.
#14
Posted 15 June 2007 - 08:04
#15
Posted 15 June 2007 - 08:29
There are intellectual property rights but I'm not an expert in the area and it gets complicated by the fact that there may only be one way of doing things right. A number of the 60s F1 cars looked pretty alike cos convergent evolution meant that was the way to do it.
Of course Shadow successfully injuncted Arrows to prevent them using the FA1, cos Southgate's Shadow designs belonged to Shadow, but if Mr Zerokeel leaves McLaren for Ferrari there's nothing to stop him from using info he happens to have in his mind as part of his general experience for his new employer.
#16
Posted 15 June 2007 - 08:50
Originally posted by alansart
...It was one of his guys who said the PRS was a Crossle copy.
Definitely a copy, but I can say no more.
#17
Posted 15 June 2007 - 09:01
Originally posted by MCS
Definitely a copy, but I can say no more.
John Crossle didn't seem bothered.
As Ensign says most cars include ideas from others.
At one time I spent a bit of time in the R&D dept at VW in Wolfsburg. I was quite surprised to see a new Jag and Renault in there. They were to be stripped down to see how they were put together.
#18
Posted 15 June 2007 - 09:05
Paul M
#19
Posted 15 June 2007 - 09:07
Was not the pyramid shape, introduced in the Parnelli VPJ in 1972 for the USAC championship, by Maurice Phillippe, copied later by several F1 teams ? ( Brabham, BRM, Surtess )
Advertisement
#20
Posted 15 June 2007 - 09:18
And what about all those so-called "Chinese McLaren" Indycars in 1972, that may or may not have been a direct crib of the M16?
#21
Posted 15 June 2007 - 09:35
Pray tell Ian!
#22
Posted 15 June 2007 - 09:38
#23
Posted 15 June 2007 - 09:46
Actually I think the Peugeot was first copied by the Indianapolis management and called the Premier. One of these copies won the race in 1919. The double overhead camshaft engine was then copied by Harry Miller when he designed his Miller-Offenhausers.
And were not a pair of Miller's engines then the basis of the Bugatti Type 51 straight eight twin-cam?
#24
Posted 15 June 2007 - 09:53
Originally posted by MCS
Chinese McLarens ??
Pray tell Ian!
Not really from the Orient, but American, of course. I remember an article in Motoring News in 1972 about a whole raft of new cars that were considered to be a direct crib of the succesful McLaren from 1971. Presumably called "Chinese" because of the way the Chinese copied other people's designs, not just in cars (although they are still doing it....).
Indy isn't my strong point, so I can only remember the name of one of them, the Kingfish.
#25
Posted 15 June 2007 - 11:10
#26
Posted 15 June 2007 - 13:10
#27
Posted 15 June 2007 - 15:22
As I understand it, most NZ U2s were built under licence. And I don't know of any NZ Cooper or Brabham 'copies' built in periodOriginally posted by Huw Jadvantich
Mallock U2s were copied in NZ, Many 'Coopers' were built in NZ, as was the odd Brabham, and many cars built from Mclaren bits.
#28
Posted 15 June 2007 - 21:12
#29
Posted 15 June 2007 - 21:53
Faloon's Tasman Brabham was a BrabhamOriginally posted by Ray Bell
Didn't the Bryan Faloon Tasman car come from the Brabham factory in Britto's back yard?
The Rorstan-Climax which he later drove did however come from the source you mention
#30
Posted 15 June 2007 - 22:26
Which Brabham did he drive?
#31
Posted 15 June 2007 - 22:50
Grant King, who did indeed have Chinese blood in him, built the Kingfish cars, which were direct copies of McLarens and Eagles of the day. I suspect that is where the term originated, as I recall the Kingfish Eagle copy frequently referred to as the "Chinese Eagle".Originally posted by ian senior
Not really from the Orient, but American, of course. I remember an article in Motoring News in 1972 about a whole raft of new cars that were considered to be a direct crib of the succesful McLaren from 1971. Presumably called "Chinese" because of the way the Chinese copied other people's designs, not just in cars (although they are still doing it....).
Indy isn't my strong point, so I can only remember the name of one of them, the Kingfish.
#32
Posted 16 June 2007 - 01:45
#33
Posted 16 June 2007 - 03:27
Benetton B196/Ligier JS41?;)
#34
Posted 16 June 2007 - 04:26
Originally posted by alansart
They do look similar but are totally different. I think the DL19 has inboard front suspension for example.
Oh I didn't mean to imply they were close to each other, just that each individually is a rather pretty car.
#35
Posted 16 June 2007 - 05:09
And the Stanton-Porsche too. But neither pretended to be a BrabhamOriginally posted by Ray Bell
And the Rorstan Porsche...
The ex-Stillwell BT4, in 1968 and 1969Originally posted by Ray Bell
Which Brabham did he drive?
Getting back to an earlier comment, one of the Rorstan Team's Brabhams did get a replacement Britton frame, but that's not the same things as a complete new car
#36
Posted 16 June 2007 - 06:27
#37
Posted 16 June 2007 - 10:39
#38
Posted 16 June 2007 - 11:25
Originally posted by David McKinney
And the Stanton-Porsche too. But neither pretended to be a Brabham
The ex-Stillwell BT4.....
Ironically, the Stanton Porsche was, I believe, built on a jig made from another Stillwell chassis. Bob made up this jig when he had the car in to build a new rear to take the Repco V8.
I think I have a bunch of photos of that chassis, actually...
#39
Posted 16 June 2007 - 13:38
Advertisement
#40
Posted 16 June 2007 - 15:29
Tyrrell 009 and Williams FW07 were very, very similar to the Lotus T79, and the Arrows A5 was near-identical to the Willams FW08. All of the above so similar that I would call them copies, even if not 100% identical to the original, er, source of inspiration.
It is interesting to note, that the cars that seem to have been copied more than any others are the spaceframe Ron Tauranac Brabhams. I think there's a message in there outlining Tauranac's greatness as a designer...
Didn't someone once say that plagiarism is the sincerest form of flattery?
#41
Posted 16 June 2007 - 15:29
#42
Posted 16 June 2007 - 18:28
Originally posted by Bonde
I think there's a message in there outlining Tauranac's greatness as a designer...
RT2 became Toleman became Lola T850?
I didn't understand all that, and judging by Mike Lawrence's book, neither did RT
#43
Posted 16 June 2007 - 19:26
Originally posted by TonyCotton
RT2 became Toleman became Lola T850?
I didn't understand all that, and judging by Mike Lawrence's book, neither did RT
...which also begat Docking-Spitzley DS-1 and Roman/SPA-Hart, if I'm not mistaken?
#44
Posted 16 June 2007 - 19:49
Originally posted by Ray Bell
When introduced to the car, Jack Brabham's reaction was far from negative, he told me. Brabhams were being copied in droves those days, Bob Britton did many copies with the full knowledge of Brabham and Tauranac.
Back in the "good old days", there was a saying: "Imitation is the sincerest form of flattery"...
Certainly not true anymore...

#45
Posted 16 June 2007 - 20:41
Here are a couple of pics of Chinese cars which look very similar to other vehicles.
X5 anyone

This isn't a smart car, Really!

Honda CRV and the illegitimate offspring.
#46
Posted 16 June 2007 - 20:49
Originally posted by Mark A
I know it's not motorsport but it's a huge problem in the road car industry at the moment with the Chinese
Off-topic, but I saw this in the Indianapolis Star the other day...
http://www.indystar....D=2007706150449
#47
Posted 16 June 2007 - 21:10
#48
Posted 16 June 2007 - 22:20
Originally posted by petefenelon
...which also begat Docking-Spitzley DS-1 and Roman/SPA-Hart, if I'm not mistaken?
Aha! Pete, you fell into my trap!
The Roman had different front and rear geometry, a modified tub, didn't use the ally sponsons and had different rear uprights on a totally different rear suspension layout. The Roman designers (there were several) also discovered that when somebody (not Rory Byrne) at Toleman narrowed the track, they totally messed up the geometry.
#49
Posted 16 June 2007 - 23:41
#50
Posted 17 June 2007 - 10:06
Originally posted by petefenelon
There's the persistent tale of one 60s manufacturer knocking off blueprints of another's car which they'd sent to a model kit maker.... only problem is nobody's Been Really Precise about who it was... but I've heard rumours ;)
In the early 80s Colin Chapman gave a set of plans of one of the ground effect Lotus to Ken Tyrrell's son to take to Japan to give to a model manufacturer. The next year's Tyrrell was uncannily similar to the plans. Chpaman was quoted in either Motor Sport or Motoring News about it!