
Australian Special: Dalro-Jaguar / Austral - Union
#1
Posted 21 September 2007 - 12:22
Alwyn Rose bought the A-U and renamed it the Dalro-Jaguar and added a huge sump to make it run cooler. He crashed it at Catalina Park in the early 1960s. Les Wiggett, Jack Baker and Alwyn rebuilt the car in 11 weeks.
They built the MKII based on XK120 components and a lighter chassis. A further weight saving was achieved with Bob Britton patterned alloy wheels. The engine was bored to 2660cc, Velocette Pistons gave 13:5 to 1 C/R!. Dunlop disk brakes were also fitted.
The Dalro-Jag seems to have been a very competitive car developed over many years.
Advertisement
#2
Posted 21 September 2007 - 12:45
Quote
Originally posted by 275 GTB-4
.....The Dalro-Jag seems to have been a very competitive car developed over many years.
And one which never succeeded in providing its driver with the security of knowing which way he'd be facing as he came out of turns...
'Developed' is rather a strong word when used in relation to this car, I believe.
#3
Posted 22 September 2007 - 01:05
Les Wright, the present owner bought in around 1983 and then promptly backed it into the unforgiving concrete wall at "stop" corner at Amaroo, flattening the tail, because he forgot that it had a centre accelerator pedal, one of Stirling Moss's pet hates. Naturally he reverted to a more conventional pedal arrangement and rebuilt the tail to its original Alwyn Rose style instead of the high tail with which it had been fitted for some years.
Les then proceed to race it extensively and very enthusiastically and successfully for the next 20 or so years and yes, crashing it on a few occasions but not I would guarantee from any fault of the car but Les testing the upper limits of its capabilities. I can attest to this having rubbed wheels with Les on several occasions in some of the titanic battles we had. Thankfully, the powers that be decided that he should be moved to the later Group M which reflected the time that Dalro 2 was built, in 1961 but far from being an alsoran the Dalro continued at the front part of the field to the eternal chagrin of Brabham owners. I had the pleasure of driving the Dalro in a race at Wakefield Park about ten years ago and can confirm that that it handles very well indeed but it took some getting used to the seating position with the left leg cocked over the gearbox.
As Les later became distracted with the Brabham Buick and Ralt RT4 the Dalro was relegated to museum duty at Bathurst but as the Ralt is now for sale Les told me last weekend that the plan is now to resurrect the Dalro and return it to Historic racing. Wouldn't it be nice if he could be invited to Goodwood with it where I'm sure he would show the other front engined cars a thing or two.
#4
Posted 22 September 2007 - 05:10
I have the new text typed up for our new edition of the book due out next year this time broken up into 3 separate volumes ie 120 140 and 150 about 450 pages per volume and around 1200 photos per volume. It will be same dimensions as previous XK book and our more recent book "The Forerunners of Jaguar" see http://www.paulskilleter.com
Below is the new text for the original 120 before it became a special. By April 1963 the Dalro was reputed to have become the fastest ever front engine car to have lapped Bathurst in a time of 2:47 secs which meant it was quicker than a Maserati 250F , what do they lap Bathurst in now with the kink 2:08 secs! It was timed down conrod at 144 mph.
As soon as I get the text typed up[ for the special I will post it. If I could work out how to post photos in under 5 secs I could post the most fantastic pic of Les Wright driving the car with great gusto
terry
660846 W3467-7
Red, Red, Sand
Austral Union/Dalro Special.
Chassis completed 29 June 1951 and despatched 13 July 1951 on the order of Brysons, Sydney The car was collected from the factory on 16 July 1951 by purchaser Mr W.R. White. The car was originally red and was re-delivered on 5 November 1951 to Mr White in Sydney (having arrived there on the “Scottish Monarch”with XK120s 660800 and 660845). Acquired subsequently by Tom Duffy and smashed by him when he collided with Tom Geoghan's Jupiter at Mr Druitt on 4 May 1952. The wreck was purchased by Larry Humphries who used it as the basis of the Austral Union Special, later known as the
Dalro Jag. See Specials Section for later history.
Regd: LDU718 (UK, Coventry, 1951), ACM977 (NSW, 1951)
#5
Posted 22 September 2007 - 06:17

#6
Posted 22 September 2007 - 08:25
Damn fine thing
URL=http://imageshack.us]

#7
Posted 22 September 2007 - 09:18
Quote
It did go overseas in the early 1980's ...Originally posted by 275 GTB-4
Have to agree with Dick....the car is "relentlessly" quick...thanks for bringing us up to date on its whereabouts...I supposed it must have gone overseas![]()
#8
Posted 22 September 2007 - 09:27
I can assure you , I took that pic myself at Phillip Island in 1992 or maybe 1993
If it went overseas...it was back then
Stan
#9
Posted 22 September 2007 - 09:35
#10
Posted 22 September 2007 - 09:57
Right......damned lucky it came back!
Stan
#11
Posted 22 September 2007 - 10:15
#12
Posted 22 September 2007 - 10:35
So how did the Dalro's lap times at Phillip Island compare with those of the Ill-fated front-engined BRM?
Stan
#13
Posted 22 September 2007 - 11:36
Arnold Glass did 2:44.7 in October 1960, Ted Gray had done 2:45.4 way back in the AGP in 1958 in the Tornado, Bib Stillwell took an Aston Martin around in 2:36.1 in 1961.
Yes, Dick, I have always taken the word of those who'd followed its history and one of those who'd ridden it backwards into a wall. However, to attribute the term 'competitive' to the car one would have to severely qualify the judgement. It was hardly competitive with front line open wheelers, as the above times show.
#14
Posted 22 September 2007 - 12:31
I was at Phillip Island when the BRM crashed and had talked to some of Spencer Flack's crew after practice and they were concerned it was running out of revs down the straight and wanted to fit bigger rear tyres. Everyone thoght it was lapping at some phenomonal speed and I had often wondered myself just what time it had done. Because the fatal crash happened in the saturday race which was red flagged no result sheet was issued so its lap times were always a mystery to me until I recently discoverd a time sheet from qualifying.
From memory I think it did 1.57, Peter Giddings did around that a couple of years ago in his 250F, Rod Jolley from the UK in his ex Patterson 2.5 Cooper got into 1'51"s this year, a few years ago the guy Paul Samuels sold his Lotus Fifteen 2.5 litre to from Denmark ? got into 1'50's, and again without checking, I am sure the Dalro has been well under 1.50, perhaps 1'48, I will check tomorrow.
So while the BRM and 250F were always regarded as quick front engined cars, at some 8 or so seconds quicker they wouldn't see which way the Dalro went.
#15
Posted 22 September 2007 - 17:30
Quote
Originally posted by Dick Willis
So while the BRM and 250F were always regarded as quick front engined cars, at some 8 or so seconds quicker they wouldn't see which way the Dalro went.
With all due respect to poor Spencer the above is based on very poor evidence - he was not amongst the quickest of drivers, he had relatively little experience in his BRM, and none of the circuit on which he died.
DCN
#16
Posted 22 September 2007 - 22:41
In the race, the BRM was duelling for the lead with the UK Lister Chevrolet, while Paul Samuels in the 2.5 Lotus XV was sitting close behind them, almost hanging back, keeping clear - it seemed. It all looked a bit hairy down the main straight on the lap of the accident and so I thought Samuels was doing the right thing under the circumstances.
However, my point is, the Lotus was running with the BRM and given that I dont believe Samuels ever drove the XV to its full potential, it would seem the BRM was not lapping all that quickly, despite its magnificent appearance and superb noise.
I cant recall seeing the Dalro run against the Lotus XV - it seemed that it was always in M & O, while the Lotus was in La & Lb, (I could be wrong) - so it seems lap times are all that can be used as a comparison.
Interesting.....
Stan
#19
Posted 23 September 2007 - 00:06
Quote
Originally posted by Stan Patterson
Dick.
In the race, the BRM was duelling for the lead with the UK Lister Chevrolet, while Paul Samuels in the 2.5 Lotus XV was sitting close behind them, almost hanging back, keeping clear - it seemed. It all looked a bit hairy down the main straight on the lap of the accident and so I thought Samuels was doing the right thing under the circumstances.
However, my point is, the Lotus was running with the BRM and given that I dont believe Samuels ever drove the XV to its full potential, it would seem the BRM was not lapping all that quickly, despite its magnificent appearance and superb noise.
I cant recall seeing the Dalro run against the Lotus XV - it seemed that it was always in M & O, while the Lotus was in La & Lb, (I could be wrong) - so it seems lap times are all that can be used as a comparison.
Interesting.....
Stan
Isn't Paul still with us and living just up the road from me??? It would be interesting to hear his take on this one - real interesting

#21
Posted 23 September 2007 - 06:27
And it is how races were run in the period.
#22
Posted 23 September 2007 - 06:57
Quote
Ray, i hope members of the historic commision are on this forum and taking notice ...........Originally posted by Ray Bell
It does show, however, that the Dalro is probably running wider tyres than it could if it ran in Group L...
And it is how races were run in the period.
#23
Posted 23 September 2007 - 07:06
The car runs in Group M, under which rules it can run those. I was mentioning this for the sake of partially explaining why it might be quicker than a 1954 GP car with an engine capacity 70% of the Dalro's.
#24
Posted 23 September 2007 - 07:32
The situation had gotten silly these days with CAMS trying to stop HQ Holdens with 4 speeds from racing against HQ Holdens with 3 speed gearboxes because of the dangerous speed differential.

I know that some common sense is needed but these days they go way beyond common sense. I wonder what CAMS would have thought the day that Winton put the cars out with the bikes for private practice. (Them bikes are very hard to pass but if you just stick the corner of the bonnet under the bike riders elbow and they soon give way!)
#25
Posted 23 September 2007 - 10:10
Quote
I remember running against at those early 90's Phillip island meetings,it was fast i would say '48s the photo of Stans shows gun driver Andrew Robson in his BT14 t/c so if racing the Dalro would have been in the top 2/3.I can remember doing a 1.48 in my Mono at the Island and the Dalro in a straight line just went buy.That is one car that should go to Goodwood.
#26
Posted 23 September 2007 - 11:41
Now despite all the previous debate about more modern tyres remember that the Dalro is shod with 70 series American road tyres costing underA$200 each, not grooved slicks, Avon or any other exotics
#27
Posted 23 September 2007 - 11:54
Quote
yep all day long sure was at the Phillip Island meetings I raced in.Originally posted by Dick Willis
So, given all the foregoing does anyone want to dispute the fact that Les and the Dalro are the qickest front engined open wheeler combination EVER to race in Australia.
Now despite all the previous debate about more modern tyres remember that the Dalro is shod with 70 series American road tyres costing underA$200 each, not grooved slicks, Avon or any other exotics
#28
Posted 23 September 2007 - 12:14
And before we get too carried away with 'fastest' and 'ever', let's not forget that there were some very quick front engined cars at the Millennium race in Adelaide (Gary Brabham, for instance, was booming along quite well in a Panoz) and some of the Clubmans around the country are pretty quick.
Worse... the barge and bash gang lap there in 1:34s...
#29
Posted 23 September 2007 - 17:58
DCN
#30
Posted 23 September 2007 - 18:31
Davo in the Aston was pretty much on a par with all but the best T51 Coopers, or a bit faster than a 250F.
It would be interesting to know what an Aston (or a 250F, for that matter) might have done with the 45 years of more or less continuous development the Dal-Ro's had since it was first built in 1961.
#31
Posted 23 September 2007 - 20:26
As to the Zephyr, the best way I can draw comparisons is by my own experiences, I could always, just beat the Zephyr at Eastern Creek and Phillip Island but the Dalro even in Group L configuration was just too quick and his times of 1.48 are way ahead of mine. Again from memory I think the best time the Zephyr did at Phillip Island was around the 1.57 mark comparable to the 250F etc.
The Aston is an unknown quantity in Australian Historics but, and please correct me if I'm wrong, I don't think an Aston has ever won a front engined Historic race in the UK when a full field of the best front engined cars were present. The Lotus 16's seem to be the front runners these days don't they or the ex Pat Hoare Ferrari.
#32
Posted 23 September 2007 - 21:10
Quote
The Astons were the cars to beat for a short time before the Dino Ferraris came onto the scene, and then Lotus 16 owners found how to make their cars go fasterOriginally posted by Dick Willis
I don't think an Aston has ever won a front engined Historic race in the UK when a full field of the best front engined cars were present. The Lotus 16's seem to be the front runners these days don't they or the ex Pat Hoare Ferrari.
Bot of course the Astons were running 3.0 engines (as they had in period) against the 2.5 of the opposition (until, as you say, the Pat Hoare 3.0 Ferrari came along)
#33
Posted 24 September 2007 - 06:04
it there in April.I take it is the car you are talking about.
#34
Posted 24 September 2007 - 07:18
Quote
Originally posted by ken devine
If you want to know where the Dalro Jaguar is know it is in the National Museum at Bathurst,i photographed
it there in April.I take it is the car you are talking about.
Yes Ken, it is...I think Dick mentioned that in an early thread...so...where are the pictures

#35
Posted 24 September 2007 - 07:41
#36
Posted 24 September 2007 - 12:26
Quote
Originally posted by ken devine
If i Knew how to post the photo i would. Help''
http://forums.autosp...&threadid=70638

#37
Posted 25 September 2007 - 02:03
In todays crop of front engine historic openwheelers I can't think of a faster car in Australia.Some may have the potential but are not campaigned.
Out of interest what LAP TIMES did Fangio do at Sandown in 1978 in the Mercedes 300 ??
#38
Posted 25 September 2007 - 04:17
Fastest lap at Sandown in 1978 in the Brabham/Fangio "race" was 1 m 21.6 seconds which was 20 secs outside the lap record of the day.
Also of course, this was on the old Sandown, so it would not be possible to compare that time with any Dalro times at the same circuit.
It should also be noted that the Brabham was capable of at least 1m 07, or thereabouts on that old circuit.
At the opening Sandown meeting March 1962, both Lex Davison and Pat Hoare raced the Aston DBR4 and Ferrari Dino V12 respectively. I dont know practice lap times, but the starting grid had Davison on Row 4 alongside 2 Cooper T51's (Youl and Whiteford), while Hoare was back on Row 6 alongside Flockhart's very tired Lotus 18 and Austin Miller's Cooper Corvette. Also Davison recorded a 1m 12.9 during the race which indicates to me the front-engined Aston it was a good bit quicker than a 250F. By way of comparison Jack Brabham recorded the fastest lap of the weekend in his 2.7 T55 Cooper at 1m 8.1 sec.
None of this really helps because it can't be compared directly with the Dalro.
Stan
#39
Posted 25 September 2007 - 05:31
I guess the thing about the Dalro is its continual development,and Les Wright's driving of it.Would be sensational at Goodwood.
Wonder what time it would do now at Bathurst.Would have to be a deal faster than Peter Hopwood's 1:44.2 in the Healey 3000 in 1998 when he was hounding Welch's Healey.
Advertisement
#40
Posted 25 September 2007 - 06:49
#41
Posted 05 October 2007 - 03:58
#42
Posted 05 October 2007 - 05:19
That Zephyr's got some go.
#43
Posted 05 October 2007 - 06:30
The Tornado had a circuit performance somewhat simliar to that of the 250F and the Davison Ferrari... ala AGP 1958.
I think it has been established that the Davison Aston was a fair bit quicker than those three..see my posting re Sandown March 1962.
We can only speculate what the Tornado would be capable of, if it been developed over the years as has been the Dalro.
David McKinney was right..the Aston was quicker than the 2.2 Coopers on some circuits..but even at wide open Sandown it was slower than Patto's T51.....but quicker than the rest.
Stan
#44
Posted 05 October 2007 - 08:00
John MacDonald had the car from '61 or so and crashed it. In the rebuild I'm sure he would have looked closely at what he was doing. He also built it into a sports car for a time.
#46
Posted 11 October 2007 - 00:46
Quote
Originally posted by Stan Patterson
Dalro engine bay - posted on behalf of Les Wright
Stan Patterson
Thank you for posting the photo showing the Dalro engine bay.
This shot should help explain some of the reasons why Allwyn Rose was able to vastly improve the handling of the Dalro when he built the mark 2 Dalro in 1961
You will note that the engine is canted to one side,allowing the driveshaft to run beside the driver,so the engine could be moved back,shortening the wheel base by some twelve inches,which also reduced overall weight, and moved the weight bias towards the rear.
The end result ,the handling is more like a rear engined car than a front engined.
I believe some of the spinning problems experienced by earlier drivers can be put down to the axle splines binding up.
#47
Posted 11 October 2007 - 01:24
[URL=http://imageshack.us]

superb pic....
Stan Patterson
#48
Posted 11 October 2007 - 03:36
I hope this was a handicap or a staggered start Les !
[URL=http://imageshack.us]

Stan Patterson
#49
Posted 11 October 2007 - 04:11
Quote
Originally posted by les wright
.....I believe some of the spinning problems experienced by earlier drivers can be put down to the axle splines binding up.
Indeed...
I recall looking at it closely, either at Catalina or an Amaroo Historic meeting or at Bathurst when Cummo drove it... the angles on the driveshafts were ridiculous.
#50
Posted 11 October 2007 - 08:20
Roger Lund.