
what is the process of a f1 car launch??
#1
Posted 12 October 2007 - 16:23
also, is there anything he has to do to stop it from stalling if he spins of the track to a stand still??
cheers in advance
Advertisement
#2
Posted 12 October 2007 - 16:28
its a start, not a launch.
there is no foot clutch, they have semi-auto gear boxes with paddle shift on the steering wheel.
so he just lines it up and selects gear at the right time.
an anti stall software program kicks in to prevent the engine stalling in a spin. sometimes this causes further problems in getting it back into gear, but at least it keeps the engine running - they have no starter motor on the car
- car launches happen over the winter when they present their new car to the press. to do this they build a new car, employ drivers, book a venue and invite the press. and then, mostly, lie - its common to see dc claim 'this is my year'
#3
Posted 12 October 2007 - 16:33
So why is it called 'launch control' then?Originally posted by le chat noir
its a start, not a launch.
#4
Posted 12 October 2007 - 16:35
Originally posted by Buttoneer
So why is it called 'launch control' then?
it doesn't exist, so it isn't called anything.
- i was just remembering brundle's put down on liz at monaco a few years back. its not a launch though is it, something launched goes in the air, and generally, thats not what you want to happen in f1. maybe it controls it so it doesn't launch. maybe, like we have seen many times this year, the people in f1 are just a little inept, a little stupid.
#5
Posted 12 October 2007 - 16:36
Originally posted by le chat noir
are you liz hurley?
its a start, not a launch.
there is no foot clutch, they have semi-auto gear boxes with paddle shift on the steering wheel.
so he just lines it up and selects gear at the right time.
an anti stall software program kicks in to prevent the engine stalling in a spin. sometimes this causes further problems in getting it back into gear, but at least it keeps the engine running - they have no starter motor on the car
- car launches happen over the winter when they present their new car to the press. to do this they build a new car, employ drivers, book a venue and invite the press. and then, mostly, lie - its common to see dc claim 'this is my year'
well then why did they call it launch control and not start control, exactly!
#6
Posted 12 October 2007 - 16:36
Originally posted by le chat noir
it doesn't exist, so it isn't called anything.
- i was just remembering brundle's put down on liz at monaco a few years back. its not a launch though is it, something launched goes in the air, and generally, thats not what you want to happen in f1. maybe it controls it so it doesn't launch. maybe, like we have seen many times this year, the people in f1 are just a little inept, a little stupid.
it did exist though
#7
Posted 12 October 2007 - 16:38
Originally posted by le chat noir
its common to see dc claim 'this is my year'



#8
Posted 12 October 2007 - 16:39
sorry no smilies. it was launch control, and it was used at starts. car launches happen in winter. now stop it!

#9
Posted 12 October 2007 - 16:43
Originally posted by le chat noir
... something launched goes in the air...,
That could come as a bit of a surprise to some dignitary as they break a bottle of champagne across the bows of a ship... "I name this ship HMS WTF"
#10
Posted 12 October 2007 - 16:47
Originally posted by FrankB
That could come as a bit of a surprise to some dignitary as they break a bottle of champagne across the bows of a ship... "I name this ship HMS WTF"
too true you b****r. but in f1 its still the start when its a race, and a launch when they're showing the new car, like with ships, or books or magazines or websites or whatever.
now who can provide more info on my rather poor explanation as to the start procedure?
#11
Posted 12 October 2007 - 17:13
This traction control like system was banned but drivers today still use a type of launch control - I reckon it is engine maps and other stuff. Anything that is normally controlled by a knob on the wheel is a parameter that can be set to certain conditions optimum for launch.
Both have used a button - it is not always a case of simply upshifting the paddle thought it wouldn't surprise me if they all work that way now.
Bring back the foot or even the hand clutch I say! There's no skill left. Every human has 0.2 sec reaction time.
Anytime I hear a "fan" say that you need to have good reflexes to be an F1 driver, it makes me cringe! F1 driving has nothing to do with reflexes, except maybe the start and avoiding accidents, and we all have pretty much the same reflexes anyway.
#12
Posted 12 October 2007 - 17:15
#13
Posted 12 October 2007 - 17:59
Originally posted by rolf123
Bring back the foot or even the hand clutch I say! There's no skill left. Every human has 0.2 sec reaction time.
Anytime I hear a "fan" say that you need to have good reflexes to be an F1 driver, it makes me cringe! F1 driving has nothing to do with reflexes, except maybe the start and avoiding accidents, and we all have pretty much the same reflexes anyway.
with the first part I agree. there is nothing you cand do great or terrible at a start...there is a small window of failure for reaction time, but after that it depends on what car you are driving, and, lately on what side of the grid you are (i.e. clean side or dirty side). I think most of us would be able to have decent starts in these cars
on the second part...i don't agree with you. every F1 driver needs GREAT reflexes. do you think detecting wheelspin and lifting a little bit is not a reflex? do you think counter steering to keep the car on track isn't based on great reflexes? the feeling the driver has is more or less his ability to react QUICK...we all can sense a car sliding, but some can do it faster....sorry, but these are reflexes
#14
Posted 12 October 2007 - 18:22
Originally posted by MikeTekRacing
with the first part I agree. there is nothing you cand do great or terrible at a start...there is a small window of failure for reaction time, but after that it depends on what car you are driving, and, lately on what side of the grid you are (i.e. clean side or dirty side). I think most of us would be able to have decent starts in these cars
on the second part...i don't agree with you. every F1 driver needs GREAT reflexes. do you think detecting wheelspin and lifting a little bit is not a reflex? do you think counter steering to keep the car on track isn't based on great reflexes? the feeling the driver has is more or less his ability to react QUICK...we all can sense a car sliding, but some can do it faster....sorry, but these are reflexes
they're learnt reflexes tho. they learn to sense the slide, the reaction time from knowledge of what is going on is the same, they just know sooner.
this was discussed at length elsewhere when there wasn't so much nonsense about, so it did become quite argumentative also.
#15
Posted 12 October 2007 - 18:41

the thing is, there should be no confusion between reflexes and reaction time.
when they sit on the grid KNOWING that the last light will go out of course there is not much to do wrong for anybody...I think anyone noticed that if the start is cancelled (yellow instead of "go") there are some drivers that move a little bit...this is because they are expecting a change and waiting for it..humans are pretty much level at this thing
but driving a car is not the same thing, you don't know what the car will do, you have to react very very quickly to changes (wheather it means brake/steer etc)
#16
Posted 12 October 2007 - 18:56
#17
Posted 12 October 2007 - 18:59
Originally posted by MikeTekRacing
of course they are learnt
the thing is, there should be no confusion between reflexes and reaction time.
when they sit on the grid KNOWING that the last light will go out of course there is not much to do wrong for anybody...I think anyone noticed that if the start is cancelled (yellow instead of "go") there are some drivers that move a little bit...this is because they are expecting a change and waiting for it..humans are pretty much level at this thing
but driving a car is not the same thing, you don't know what the car will do, you have to react very very quickly to changes (wheather it means brake/steer etc)
but reflex learnt, is a reaction.
a reflex is natural - putting your hand in boiling water and pulling it out, taking a hammer to your knee.
if he's learnt to react, learnt to anticipate, what appears to be a reflex is a reaction. all the drivers will have similar reaction times, but those better in tune, will react earlier through earlier knowledge. i think we might just be talking semantics though, rather than what a driver is doing. you seem to say the lights thing is a reaction and the driving a reflex, while i'd have it the other way around. but in fact i wouldn't cos the lights is also a reaction. a reflex is an involuntary response, and that is not how they drive, a reaction time is static give or take in everyone, a reaction itself tho can be improved and achieved quicker, not by applying reflexes or improving reaction time, but by sensing the problem sooner and learning how to control the car better.
#18
Posted 12 October 2007 - 21:16
I wonder about the brakes. On some starts you definitely need them to keep the car from creeping down a slope, but I don't know about any automatic systems. I thought they just stepped on them until the lights went off and released the clutch paddle. Didn't Massa stall or something once this season?.
#19
Posted 12 October 2007 - 21:29
Advertisement
#20
Posted 13 October 2007 - 00:33
Thankfully, neither Nobel prize laureated Ivan Petrovich Pavlov nor his dogs were able to read this insightful post in the dawn of the 20th century...Originally posted by le chat noir
but reflex learnt, is a reaction.
a reflex is natural - putting your hand in boiling water and pulling it out, taking a hammer to your knee.
if he's learnt to react, learnt to anticipate, what appears to be a reflex is a reaction. all the drivers will have similar reaction times, but those better in tune, will react earlier through earlier knowledge. i think we might just be talking semantics though, rather than what a driver is doing. you seem to say the lights thing is a reaction and the driving a reflex, while i'd have it the other way around. but in fact i wouldn't cos the lights is also a reaction. a reflex is an involuntary response, and that is not how they drive, a reaction time is static give or take in everyone, a reaction itself tho can be improved and achieved quicker, not by applying reflexes or improving reaction time, but by sensing the problem sooner and learning how to control the car better.