
Montezemolo "McLaren MP4-23 is a silver Ferrari"
#1
Posted 11 January 2008 - 23:43
http://www.express.d...d=1195300979669
Also Aldo Costa is quoted saying "they had the chance to understand our technical knowledge and how to get the best out of it, so we really know how that knowledge has been used in the new McLaren"
#3
Posted 11 January 2008 - 23:51
#4
Posted 11 January 2008 - 23:57
"Red against silver - it is again! The espionage war between Ferrari and McLaren-Mercedes, with the 72-million penalty and disqualification of all championship points for the silver arrows, and the public apology by McLaren boss Ron Dennis ended.
But Ferrari president Luca di Montezemolo subordinate to the British-German team Ideenklau continued: "The new car is a silver Ferrari."
With old allegations in the new season! At Ferrari bosses have no opportunity, against Erzrivale McLaren to shoot.
After Luca di Montezemolo also accused chief technology Aldo Costa McLaren-Mercedes, Ferrari-secret data for the construction of the new MP4-23 used to have. "The documentary, which was made available McLaren, has given them the opportunity to spread the benefits of Ferrari technical concepts to understand," Costa refers to the Ferrari factory director Nigel Stepney to McLaren-designer Mike Coughlan passed, 780-page mystery Dossier. "I would therefore say that know-how of Ferrari in the new McLaren is incorporated."
A hard allegation, vigorously denied Dennis ( "As our MP4-22 is based our new car exclusively on our ideas and our know-how") - and the World Federation FIA after Dennis' knee is no longer the case MP4-23. F1 boss Bernie Ecclestone himself gave the new Silver Arrow on Monday in Stuttgart his blessing.
Even for FIA president Max Mosley, Dennis, a fierce enemy, the espionage case after his public penance. Welfare law, if the Ferrari, the McLaren compares (see above). Expert Hans-Joachim Stuck: "Both cars are at first glance is so different, as is spaghetti and roast Swabian rust."
But Montezemolo and Co. tear vernarbten the fresh wounds again. And even sprinkle salt into it. Former team boss Jean Todt criticized the FIA decision for the standard electronics SECU McLaren: "We would have preferred if the only control unit for all Formula 1 teams from another company would have been built."
#5
Posted 12 January 2008 - 00:05
#6
Posted 12 January 2008 - 00:10
Ohh well it's the off-season I guess

#7
Posted 12 January 2008 - 00:26
Originally posted by Sébastien
Well Express is just a piece of **** rag, I don't understand why anybody would start a thread with that as the basis??
Ohh well it's the off-season I guess![]()
Totally, must be a slow news day!!!!
Maybe Luca is upset that Stepney's book is going to come out after all, and the truth about him spending 50% of Ferraris budget on fake tan oil will come out


#8
Posted 12 January 2008 - 00:31
really shows how much he cares about the sport, hes a bitter man who thinks his opinion matters, he only pops up in the media if hes criticizing other teams. no place in f1 for people like that.
#9
Posted 12 January 2008 - 01:04
Originally posted by Mika Mika
Totally, must be a slow news day!!!!
Maybe Luca is upset that Stepney's book is going to come out after all, and the truth about him spending 50% of Ferraris budget on fake tan oil will come out![]()
![]()
I wish he'd spend the other 50% on getting his hair cut - I mean that barnet went out in the 70's didnt it? :
#10
Posted 12 January 2008 - 01:41
but it's OK for ferrari to copy the Toyota nose

#11
Posted 12 January 2008 - 02:14
Originally posted by interneth8machine
Why are italians always this unsportmanly ?
![]()
Because they don't play cricket at school

Ferrari management do seem to be unable to separate what's good for the sport and what's good for Ferrari.
If they lose it's regarded as bad for the sport. If they win the natural order is re-established.
Little Satan Mclaren teamed up with the evil empire Microsoft is the ultimate Anglo-Saxon conspiracy and the cue for further hysteria from the men in red.
adam
#12
Posted 12 January 2008 - 03:10
#13
Posted 12 January 2008 - 04:26
#14
Posted 12 January 2008 - 06:13
Originally posted by Menace
Seriously, is every thread really worth a flame war?
Agreed, it seems every thread has a nasty habit of turning into the same subject. Some people seem to take any opportunity they can to get a dig in at the rival team just to stir things up again. There seems to be a mentality whereby forum members make inflammatory comments they know are going to upset a certain collective of fans to get a response, but then complain when someone does the same to them. Double Standards.
And please let's not go down the route of making mass generalisations about an entire nation of people based on the conduct/comments of one person, it's quite rude and insulting. And I suspect if your nationality was on the receiving end you wouldn't particularly like it much either.
#15
Posted 12 January 2008 - 06:54
Originally posted by interneth8machine
here comes the excuses already in case McLaren beat them. Why are italians always this unsportmanly.
but it's OK for ferrari to copy the Toyota nose![]()
Is your epic stupidity and ignorance a product of environment or pedigree? Just wondering.
#16
Posted 12 January 2008 - 07:21
Quite.Originally posted by undersquare
A hard allegation, vigorously denied Dennis ( "As our MP4-22 is based our new car exclusively on our ideas and our know-how") - and the World Federation FIA after Dennis' knee is no longer the case MP4-23. F1 boss Bernie Ecclestone himself gave the new Silver Arrow on Monday in Stuttgart his blessing.
Even for FIA president Max Mosley, Dennis, a fierce enemy, the espionage case after his public penance. Welfare law, if the Ferrari, the McLaren compares (see above). Expert Hans-Joachim Stuck: "Both cars are at first glance is so different, as is spaghetti and roast Swabian rust."
#17
Posted 12 January 2008 - 09:07
#18
Posted 12 January 2008 - 09:29
Originally posted by airwise
It's sad how the Scuderia feel the need to denigrate their opposition before the season gets underway. The amount they have had to say about Hamilton these past few weeks suggests they are genuinely worried. Luca is no stranger to mind games. But it would be nice if they just shut up and got on with the job of developing a championship winning car.
I like Ferrari but I agree with you. Montezemolo is clearly overdoing it already. He should shut up and be a good winner, not a bad one. I also realized they take every opportunity to play mind-games against Hamilton. I too think that's because they know he is their biggest opponent for 2008.
#19
Posted 12 January 2008 - 09:34
Advertisement
#20
Posted 12 January 2008 - 09:41
Why should we forget before it's over. McLaren learned Ferrari throughoutly last year and this year they are able to take benefit of it, too. It takes a couple years before it's all old and meaningless.Originally posted by Showty
Here we go again.
#21
Posted 12 January 2008 - 10:29
I think personal insults are banned on this forum.Originally posted by Scudetto
Is your epic stupidity and ignorance a product of environment or pedigree? Just wondering.
#22
Posted 12 January 2008 - 10:34
exceptions should be madeOriginally posted by se7en_24
I think personal insults are banned on this forum.
#23
Posted 12 January 2008 - 11:16
I would never imagine a company's CEO bashing its main rival on the he does.
#24
Posted 12 January 2008 - 11:31
Originally posted by micra_k10
Why should we forget before it's over. McLaren learned Ferrari throughoutly last year and this year they are able to take benefit of it, too. It takes a couple years before it's all old and meaningless.
McLaren and Ferrari observe each other closely every year. They take photos, make estimates, and trade staff, in both directions.
A Ferrari staff member was a mole, so both teams have some responsibility. This would have looked more like what it was if Stepney had been Italian, I think.
All the FIA investigations found were three minor items, one of which McLaren had already looked at in 2001.
McLaren have recruited a senior aerodynamicist from Ferrari, who is quite legally going to tell them a lot more than Stepney.
McLaren had a huge fine and repercussions from losing their WCC points.
IMO there is a fair balance in how all this adds up. The 2008 cars look quite different, and the extent to which they have converged from 2007 is in all probability from legal observation.
Any claims now that the 2008 competition is unfair are unsporting, IMO. Ferrari and their fans can only lose respect by exaggerating it.
#25
Posted 12 January 2008 - 12:57
Ferrari have earnt to say what they want, they are the Godfathers of Formula One, Luca is Al Pacino, don't mess with Luca.


#26
Posted 12 January 2008 - 13:00
Originally posted by se7en_24
I think personal insults are banned on this forum.
It wasn't an insult. I was merely asking about a condition he clearly demonstrated himself to suffer from.
#27
Posted 12 January 2008 - 13:02
Originally posted by SeanValen
Mclaren's reputation was dented big time in 2007, they were cheats,
So were Renault - why is their reputation not 'dented big time'?
#28
Posted 12 January 2008 - 13:07
Originally posted by Scudetto
It wasn't an insult. I was merely asking about a condition he clearly demonstrated himself to suffer from.

its amazing how there are so many threads bout the same issue and yet we manage every single time to look at it from a different point of view.
#29
Posted 12 January 2008 - 13:08
One of Renault's employees got caught doing something stupid. McLaren as a whole organisation got caught out doing something stupid, lying about it, and waging a damaging media campaign against the governing body and its competitors to bluster its way out of the hole it had dug for itself.
Renault acted with forthright alacrity. McLaren at best acted with patronising self-interest and poor sportsmanship. And at worst acted illegally, immorally and in gross disrespect of the sport and its fans.
#30
Posted 12 January 2008 - 13:10
Ummm, Al Pacino is an actor.....oh wait, so is Luca. You're right, they are one and the sameOriginally posted by SeanValen
they are the Godfathers of Formula One, Luca is Al Pacino, don't mess with Luca.![]()

As usual, I can see that many here need to get a grip on reality.
F1 is about the business of entertainment PERIOD
You are NOT part of the team or family (unless you work for them or an immediate family does).
If you are a direct vendor for that team, they are a business vendor not family or true friend (as you would find out if your product was found inferior to another).
#31
Posted 12 January 2008 - 13:11
Originally posted by Lazarus II
Ummm, Al Pacino is an actor.....oh wait, so is Luca. You're right, they are one and the same![]()
and formula 1 is a movie then

#32
Posted 12 January 2008 - 13:13

#33
Posted 12 January 2008 - 13:13
Originally posted by hobbes
and formula 1 is a movie then![]()
Or at least a pantomime... :-)
#34
Posted 12 January 2008 - 13:14
#35
Posted 12 January 2008 - 13:18
It's entertainment.Originally posted by hobbes
and formula 1 is a movie then![]()

#36
Posted 12 January 2008 - 13:18
Originally posted by Chiara
Has anyone seen the film Groundhog Day?Just curious.

#37
Posted 12 January 2008 - 13:20
Originally posted by kar
Because they didn't lie about it as habitually as McLaren did. They didn't spread misinformation in the press about their involvement or those of other teams. They didn't repeatedly try to ruin the championship with un-sporting, un-founded and illegal protests. Their involvement in spying related to a miniscule amount of data relative to McLaren's, and they, unlike McLaren, were not shown to have tried to use that data for their 2008 car, or simulate tests of it on their 2007 one.
One of Renault's employees got caught doing something stupid. McLaren as a whole organisation got caught out doing something stupid, lying about it, and waging a damaging media campaign against the governing body and its competitors to bluster its way out of the hole it had dug for itself.
Renault acted with forthright alacrity. McLaren at best acted with patronising self-interest and poor sportsmanship. And at worst acted illegally, immorally and in gross disrespect of the sport and its fans.
A fine example of what Montezemolo is trying to whip up. Wild exaggeration. Words used because they are derogatory but, in their context, meaningless. "Patronising self-interest"? What's that?
A refusal to compete on the track in 2008.
#38
Posted 12 January 2008 - 13:24
Originally posted by Scudetto
You mean to imply that F1 will be the same monotonous toil season to season until someone sleeps with Andie MacDowell?
The scene where they drive into the quarry is Toyota.
#39
Posted 12 January 2008 - 13:46
Originally posted by kar
Because they didn't lie about it as habitually as McLaren did. They didn't spread misinformation in the press about their involvement or those of other teams. They didn't repeatedly try to ruin the championship with un-sporting, un-founded and illegal protests. Their involvement in spying related to a miniscule amount of data relative to McLaren's, and they, unlike McLaren, were not shown to have tried to use that data for their 2008 car, or simulate tests of it on their 2007 one.
One of Renault's employees got caught doing something stupid. McLaren as a whole organisation got caught out doing something stupid, lying about it, and waging a damaging media campaign against the governing body and its competitors to bluster its way out of the hole it had dug for itself.
Renault acted with forthright alacrity. McLaren at best acted with patronising self-interest and poor sportsmanship. And at worst acted illegally, immorally and in gross disrespect of the sport and its fans.
What bollocks. It was well known at Renault that Mclaren drawings were floating about, yet they didn't come forward and say so until somebody snitched on them! How is that 'forthright alacrity'? Surely, not telling the governing body in the hope that no-one would find out is acting in ones self interest?
I love the 'Renault were not shown to have tried to use the data for their 2008 car' bit' no, of course, the drawings were just for Mackereths kids to scribble on.
Really, kar, either you are astonishingly naive - which the clarity and intelligence of many of your posts displays otherwise - or you are happy to hide behind falsities in the hope that the world percieves McLaren as the only team that could possibly be guilty of such terrible crimes.
Advertisement
#40
Posted 12 January 2008 - 14:53
Luca's just showing his insecurity, afterall if its a Ferrari copy then it wont be any faster will it ?
#41
Posted 12 January 2008 - 15:01
#42
Posted 12 January 2008 - 15:47
Originally posted by Melbourne Park
Ferrari can enjoy these sunny days, where they have a single McLaren team threatening them. But over the mountains, BMW and Honda and Renault march forward hidden behind the excitement of pointing fingers at McLaren. Ferrari would be best to stick to their knitting, and focus on their own business, as they have previously done until a couple of years ago - complaining about McLaren is not going to make the F cars faster.
Interesting, were Ferrari more polite through the media to their rivals when Schumacher was around

#43
Posted 12 January 2008 - 16:04

#44
Posted 12 January 2008 - 16:47
Originally posted by Chiara
Has anyone seen the film Groundhog Day?Just curious.
Yes, I have seen it, and it seemed to be about the emptiness of a life led in self-absorption, sarcasm, and a general negative view of others and their worth; and wasn't it trying to establish the personal benefits derived from the daily enjoyment of those we live and communicate with?
Ah, who knows, maybe I missed the point of the movie.
#45
Posted 12 January 2008 - 16:55
Originally posted by Juan Kerr
de Montezemelo must go, the only clever thing Ferrari did in the last 20 years was hire Michael Schumacher and he's someone that Mercedes groomed. If it wasn't for Michael they would've remained in the doldrums. McLaren have always been trend setters and sportsman it was always Ferrari that cheated.
Luca's just showing his insecurity, afterall if its a Ferrari copy then it wont be any faster will it ?
You clearly haven't got the first clue what your talking about if you don't know the significant part Luca di Montezemolo played in the revival of Ferrari's fortunes since he became President in 1991. Perhaps you might want to get a bit more educated on that before making silly statements like that above.
Without Luca di Montezemolo, Jean Todt would not have been brought to Ferrari - and he was instrumental in turning around the fortunes of the racing team by bringing to Maranello all their key players. This core group of people took the team and changed beyond recognition their methods and working practices, and it was this that was largely responsible for Ferrari's success record in the last 10 years. Michael Schumacher was one part of that success not the whole reason for it.
You ask any modern F1 team, or in fact any of the F1 engineers that frequent this forum, it takes every single person in an F1 team to make it successful - not just the driver.
#46
Posted 12 January 2008 - 16:59
#47
Posted 12 January 2008 - 17:31
Speculation is something completely different to direct quotes.Originally posted by united
Express run a story of Alonso signing for BMW-Sauber a couple of months ago. So much for Cologne tabloids.
#48
Posted 12 January 2008 - 17:36
Originally posted by se7en_24
Speculation is something completely different to direct quotes.
I'm undecided if they are simliar quotes as we have heard before that have been made again recently, or a bit of artist license on part of the publication to rehash some old ones to make a story out of in the absence of anything else to talk about. I wouldn't put it past the media to be the latter....
#49
Posted 12 January 2008 - 18:06
Originally posted by santori
I like Luca's hair.
How can you be sure it's his?
#50
Posted 12 January 2008 - 19:00
You forgot a bit '....Jean Todt would not have brought (Michael Schumacher) to Ferrari....'Originally posted by Chiara
You clearly haven't got the first clue what your talking about if you don't know the significant part Luca di Montezemolo played in the revival of Ferrari's fortunes since he became President in 1991. Perhaps you might want to get a bit more educated on that before making silly statements like that above.
Without Luca di Montezemolo, Jean Todt would not have been brought to Ferrari - and he was instrumental in turning around the fortunes of the racing team by bringing to Maranello all their key players. This core group of people took the team and changed beyond recognition their methods and working practices, and it was this that was largely responsible for Ferrari's success record in the last 10 years. Michael Schumacher was one part of that success not the whole reason for it.
You ask any modern F1 team, or in fact any of the F1 engineers that frequent this forum, it takes every single person in an F1 team to make it successful - not just the driver.