
Why they chosen Montoya over Button
#1
Posted 23 September 2000 - 11:58
"Regarding Juan, it was obvious to many people, including myself and Patrick -- Patrick Head, my partner -- that in Formula 3000 he was very gifted. We just felt we would continue to make every effort to secure him; and that has happened.
Regrettably, I want to state, at Jenson Button's expense. And Jenson is going to be another great driver. We're very sad he's had to go elsewhere for a period of time. But we had already made an unspoken commitment to Juan and we didn't intend to back out of it because suddenly it was inconvenient. "
=================================
After Jenson's great rookie year, lots of people questioned BMW-Williams' sanity for letting go of Button (however temporarily) in favour of Montoya. So that's the reason - they have too much integrity, honesty and pride to go back on their word... Afterall, contracts have been broken before, and Montoya didn't even have a written one, so they're just all-round good guys!!;)
Presuming it was because of a verbal commitment they'd given to Montoya, based on Jenson's good results and Montoya's 'gift' what do you think they would have done if that verbal commitment to Montoya had never been made?
I think they would still have gone for Montoya.
Advertisement
#2
Posted 23 September 2000 - 12:10
#3
Posted 23 September 2000 - 12:14
From what went down during this year, it is clear now, that Button was never meant to stay for 2001. If Sir Frank had (at the slightest) NOT made up his mind from the beginning, then Button (with such performance) would've stayed for sure.
It's just that Button's pace surprised everyone and made FW look like a jerk. Button was to ride the Williams for a year, score 1 point at best, and then be given to another team to see how he develops. The fact that he proved from day one that he is ready to stand remarkably on the track was a possibility that FW and his staff never calculated.
Now they are left exposed.
#4
Posted 23 September 2000 - 12:29
#5
Posted 23 September 2000 - 12:48
Fisichella's 18 points existed at the same time with Ralph's 12 (circa Canada) !!!!!!
Also, Button is a damn rookie, no experience, no knowledge, even, of most tracks AND was surely going to be given away at the end of the season!!!
Reexamine the facts Arc7.
#6
Posted 23 September 2000 - 13:00
Yeah, I think the verbal contract excuse is just to justify why they are 'getting rid of' an obviously talented rookie, and also maybe to make it look a bit better for Jenson and themselves. As we all know, and as already been pointed out, Frank's not scared to turf anyone out and would have kept Jenson if he really wanted to, and an 'inconveniece' is not going to stop FW from doing what he wants to do.Originally posted by arcwulf7
The bottom line is Montoya is going to Williams because Sir Frank thinks he's quicker.
If Montoya succeeds, then great - if not, it was all because of that damn pesky verbal agreement!
#7
Posted 23 September 2000 - 13:08
#8
Posted 23 September 2000 - 13:19
Originally posted by Max Torque
Villeneuve's (WDC!) Honda powered machine is inferior to the BMW??!!!!
Come on now - we're not talking about dragsters here!

That BAR chassis has come along way since the beginning of the season, but it was nowhere near as good as the Williams at the start of the season.
Maybe FW should 'pull a Penske' and run three cars - he's got loads of driver talent available.

#9
Posted 23 September 2000 - 13:24
If this year's Button was there last year, we would be talking about that team already, even though it was Supertec powered.
My point is that Button is the one that makes the BMW Williams team look good. Not Ralf. If there was a pointless Zanardi in his place today, then the team wouldn't seem so hot. It would've scored less points than the previous year, but due to the downfall of Jordan and Jaguar (Stewart) would probably finish third too.
Third isn't such an incredible feat this year.
Button's standings are.[p][Edited by Max Torque on 09-23-2000]
#10
Posted 23 September 2000 - 13:27
#11
Posted 23 September 2000 - 13:37
A lot of people were questioning Frank Williams senses when he left Montoya go to the USA in the first place.
Montoya is an accomplished driver in everything that he has driven in so far. Techniclly he is a better driver than Button.
Anyway Button will be back at Williams for 2004
Niall
#12
Posted 23 September 2000 - 13:46
Frank said it was very close between Monotya and Ralf - and Ralf won because of his 2 years of experience. So, I guess in that case they chose the guy most experienced in F1 racing.Originally posted by Ali_G
A lot of people were questioning Frank Williams senses when he left Montoya go to the USA in the first place.
I'm not arguing that Button should be kept over Montoya. I don't support either driver. I was just making fun of them saying they took on Montoya because they had a verbal agreement and wouldn't reneg just because of an inconvenience. They obviously wanted Montoya - just come out and say it!
#13
Posted 23 September 2000 - 13:48
#14
Posted 23 September 2000 - 13:58
But what I was saying (perhaps I got too confusing there) is that Ralf's performance in 99 was better than 00 overall. More points. Better podium placing. He even posted fastest lap.
Last year's car was at least as good as this year's if you measure it by the only constant factor -Ralf (Everything else changed). But weaker competition and greater support from the no2 driver gives the impression that this year's package is an improvement of 99's effort.
If you see it from the point of view that I describe, that's wrong.[p][Edited by Max Torque on 09-23-2000]
#15
Posted 23 September 2000 - 15:05
#16
Posted 23 September 2000 - 15:42
Originally posted by AD
If we look at qualifying JB is always around 0.5s away from RS, except for around 1 race in 6.
Jenson has outqualified Ralf 4 times in 14 races, that's 1 in 3.5 races.
#17
Posted 23 September 2000 - 15:58
Arcwulf what are you talking about? - Williams even when to the absurd extreme of giving Zanardi steel brake discs in a bid to make him comfortable with the car - unheard of!
Williams bend over backward to accommodate Zanardi - he failed to deliver.
Zanardi failed because he could not drive a modern F1 car, Herbert blew him away at Lotus and Ralf blew him away at Williams - AZ is simply not good enough for F1.
Button has been very unlucky with reliability compared to Ralf, he has dropped out of the race whilst in the points at least twice (possibly three times) due to bad reliability, and once for driver error same as Ralf.
So the difference in points between them is more than just driver ability.
As for Button having a Ok season - he has out-qualified and qualified alongside Michael Schumacher in an inferior car - do you not consider that to be amazing? Button is an outstanding driver. He has driven cars for just TWO YEARS before arriving in F1 - think about it.
I honestly believe Montoya will struggle in F1, he will be gifted a beautifully handling car (the Williams is just getting better and better) but I still believe he will try and overdrive and will ultimately prove he is a good all-round driver - nothing exceptional. His pace in the European formulas proved he is nothing special - he never did the amazing giant killing drives Button managed in FFord or in F3 when he was driving a markedly inferior car, winning on power circuits with the duff Mugen behind him is unheard of in modern Brit F3 - Button did it more than once.
#18
Posted 23 September 2000 - 16:24
#19
Posted 23 September 2000 - 16:58
Button's debut is not as fantastic as some would like to think, true, but he has avoided a lot of the embarassments of, say, Ralf's first year whilst still driving competitively and getting results. I tip Ralf as a future WDC (given the right equipment, naturally) and I like to think that Button has similar promise, though he'll need another year to learn various tricks of the trade - such as anticipating slowing of the pack before a restart...;)
Additionally, I'm really hoping that Montoya won't suffer from Zanardi syndrome as it might well be another nail in the coffin of American interest in F1. Should be a good year, should 2001!
Advertisement
#20
Posted 23 September 2000 - 17:41
#21
Posted 23 September 2000 - 18:57

1. 3 M.SCHUMACHER Ferrari 1'14"266 203.350 Km/h
2. 2 COULTHARD McLaren Mercedes 1'14"392 + 0'00"126
3. 1 HAKKINEN McLaren Mercedes 1'14"428 + 0'00"162
4. 4 BARRICHELLO Ferrari 1'14"600 + 0'00"334
5. 6 TRULLI Jordan Mugen-Honda 1'15"006 + 0'00"740
6. 10 BUTTON Williams BMW 1'15"017 + 0'00"751
7. 5 FRENTZEN Jordan Mugen-Honda 1'15"067 + 0'00"801
8. 22 VILLENEUVE BAR Honda 1'15"317 + 0'01"051
9. 16 DINIZ Sauber Petronas 1'15"418 + 0'01"152
10. 9 R.SCHUMACHER Williams BMW 1'15"484 + 0'01"218
11. 12 WURZ Benetton Supertec 1'15"762 + 0'01"496
12. 23 ZONTA BAR Honda 1'15"784 + 0'01"518
13. 19 VERSTAPPEN Arrows Supertec 1'15"808 + 0'01"542
14. 17 SALO Sauber Petronas 1'15"881 + 0'01"615
15. 11 FISICHELLA Benetton Supertec 1'15"907 + 0'01"641
16. 15 HEIDFELD Prost Peugeot 1'16"060 + 0'01"794
17. 7 IRVINE Jaguar Ford 1'16"098 + 0'01"832
18. 18 DE LA ROSA Arrows Supertec 1'16"143 + 0'01"877
19. 8 HERBERT Jaguar Ford 1'16"225 + 0'01"959
20. 14 ALESI Prost Peugeot 1'16"471 + 0'02"205
21. 21 MAZZACANE Minardi Fondmetal 1'16"809 + 0'02"543
22. 20 GENE Minardi Fondmetal 1'17"161 + 0'02"895
#22
Posted 23 September 2000 - 19:50
JB has proven to be a real find this year. If we compare his first year to RS', JB come off looking very good. He's suffered more mechanicals than RS. In addition, there was one race where Williams sacrificed his race results to induce another team to pit early so RS could profit from the resulting open track. If Benetton gets their package together next year, he will some definite improvement.
Thank you.
#23
Posted 23 September 2000 - 20:49
There may be some truth to that, but in the end a good and self confident driver will take control. There was some animosity between JV and Patric Head because Head disagreed with much of JV's setup's and preferences, but by the end of 97, Head had been proven wrong and gained alot of respect for JV, because JV knew what he wanted and didn't let anyone get in his way or tell him what to do. If a driver allows himself to get bullied in that sense and doesn't have the skill or guts to fight back and take control of a situation then thats his problem. Motorsports can not always been ideal in the situations dealt.
#24
Posted 23 September 2000 - 21:16
#25
Posted 23 September 2000 - 21:30
#26
Posted 23 September 2000 - 21:44
#27
Posted 24 September 2000 - 00:58
Left foot braking's the norm in F1 because it is the quicker way round - Hill was forced to switch to left foot braking when he went to Jordan - he still won a race, driver talent is driver talent and a talented driver can adapt - even a (over the Hill) Damon adapted to left foot braking.
Caractacus, Yes Zanardi often qualified well against Ralf, but to say we can't use that as ammunition to say Button is good because AZ did well is stupid, give Button 2 years in F1 then two years in CART and then plonk him next to Ralf and *then* you've got a level playing ground as far as showcasing talent.
Three years ago Jenson was driving Go-Carts he has never even been in F3000 as he went straight from F3 to F1 (the only ever driver to do that successfully was Senna.) To gain command of an F1 car so quickly despite only having roughly 50 car races under your belt is stunning.
#28
Posted 24 September 2000 - 02:07
the rules state that each consturctor must enter two cars, no more, no lessOriginally posted by Davebo
Maybe FW should 'pull a Penske' and run three cars - he's got loads of driver talent available.
#29
Posted 24 September 2000 - 02:20