Was it because of the 1963 Indianapolis 500.? and why?
Had Trevor Taylor, anything to do with it?
Questions...
Paul Hooft
Edited by paulhooft, 15 January 2010 - 21:49.
Posted 15 January 2010 - 21:48
Edited by paulhooft, 15 January 2010 - 21:49.
Advertisement
Posted 15 January 2010 - 21:52
Posted 16 January 2010 - 00:32
Posted 16 January 2010 - 05:21
When was the yellow striped 1963 Lotus 25 first entered in a Grand Prix?....... South Africa GP (from what pics i can find)
Was it because of the 1963 Indianapolis 500.? and why?
Had Trevor Taylor, anything to do with it?
Questions...
Paul Hooft
Posted 16 January 2010 - 05:28
Posted 16 January 2010 - 08:53
Posted 16 January 2010 - 10:22
In correct ill change that to German Gp .1963
Edited by B Squared, 16 January 2010 - 10:23.
Posted 16 January 2010 - 11:13
Posted 16 January 2010 - 11:41
Posted 16 January 2010 - 12:40
Posted 16 January 2010 - 17:34
Posted 16 January 2010 - 19:24
Fascinating photo. Team Lotus almost always used the white discs through the sixties, regardless of the yellow stripe. I wonder why they went with plain white numbers on Taylor's car.DSJ mentions that Taylor had an aero-screen too, but his bodywork didn't have a yellow stripe and the numbers were white, not black-on-white discs like Clark's.
http://www.eajonesgu...tart_colour.jpg
Given ACBC's attention to presentation, I wonder why the differences.............and why nobody added the top of the side roundel to Clark's car.
Paul M
Posted 16 January 2010 - 20:01
Posted 17 January 2010 - 09:54
Posted 17 January 2010 - 10:35
Edited by Phil Rainford, 17 January 2010 - 15:25.
Posted 17 January 2010 - 12:03
A couple of shots from last last year's Gold Cup Meeting.....
PAR
Posted 17 January 2010 - 12:47
Nice shots, but it just doesn"t look right with a full face helmet does it?
Advertisement
Posted 11 January 2012 - 02:00
Posted 11 January 2012 - 07:23
Posted 11 January 2012 - 08:08
Posted 11 January 2012 - 08:49
Posted 11 January 2012 - 10:11
Posted 11 January 2012 - 10:22
Posted 11 January 2012 - 10:48
At Solitude the three cars all had different types of drive shaft. Clark's failed on the line, and they were changed during the race, giving rise to one of the all-time great drives and a lap record broken by 6.5 seconds. I find it amazing that a racing team could be such a shambles and expect to compete at the top level, let alone win any races.
Posted 11 January 2012 - 12:45
Edited by Macca, 11 January 2012 - 12:48.
Posted 11 January 2012 - 23:26
Posted 12 January 2012 - 06:36
Posted 12 January 2012 - 06:49
Posted 12 January 2012 - 09:27
Given ACBC's attention to presentation, I wonder why the differences.............and why nobody added the top of the side roundel to Clark's car.
Posted 12 January 2012 - 09:34
Posted 12 January 2012 - 11:12
Posted 12 January 2012 - 13:49
Slightly o/t but are those wire wheels on the Ferrari?
Posted 12 January 2012 - 14:03
Posted 12 January 2012 - 14:27
Posted 12 January 2012 - 15:15
Posted 13 January 2012 - 20:49
Posted 14 January 2012 - 07:40
The classic racing car for me will always be Jim Clark's Lotus 25 with yellow wobbley webs, center stript, and air deflector windscreen. What a fantastic look!
Since it seems the first appearance of the stripe was at Indy '63, perhaps Colin found inspiration in a local corn field?
http://www.deere.com...reen_fever.page?
Advertisement
Posted 14 January 2012 - 08:23
Posted 14 January 2012 - 09:49
You say that Trevor Taylor crashed R5 at the Belgian Grand Prix during the race. Didn't this happen during practice? I thought that he raced R3, retiring with engine problems of some sort.
Posted 14 January 2012 - 10:31
Not two incidents. A crash in practice and a mechanical failure in the race. Which Wiki says that he crashed in the race?I'll gladly bow to your superior knowledge and Lotus library Roger, I was unaware he had been involved in two incidents during the Belgian GP ?
Wiki (my best resource) on the race suggests Trevor retired after an accident from the race but does not say which chassis he was driving.
Posted 14 January 2012 - 10:42
Posted 14 January 2012 - 14:21
Great picture. Has anyone picked up that "Team Lotus" was not painted on the bodywork of JC's car? The reason that there was not a completed circle on fibre glass body and no "Team Lotus" on the side is that they both painted by the sign writer. I am sure this was a new nose cone and there was not enough time to complete this work prior to the race.DSJ mentions that Taylor had an aero-screen too, but his bodywork didn't have a yellow stripe and the numbers were white, not black-on-white discs like Clark's.
http://www.eajonesgu...tart_colour.jpg
Given ACBC's attention to presentation, I wonder why the differences.............and why nobody added the top of the side roundel to Clark's car.
Paul M
Posted 14 January 2012 - 14:59
I can't remember having seen "physical" as a reason for retirement before. The Wikepedia page quotes John Thompson as a source but he says "driver unfit". The contemporary Autosport report and the Black Book both say low oil pressure. DSJ's report says that Taylor reared with "low oil pressure" (his quotes), and the results list the reason for retirement as "-- !! --".Sorry Roger getting my '63 Belgian GP mixed up with '62 this morning, Wiki says Trevor had an accident on lap 25 in 1962, and 'physical' is listed as the reason for his retirement on lap 5 of the 1963 Belgian GP.
Posted 14 January 2012 - 15:19
The 1963 Automobile Year has his reason for retirement as "---" and doesn't mention him in the race report at all.I can't remember having seen "physical" as a reason for retirement before. The Wikepedia page quotes John Thompson as a source but he says "driver unfit". The contemporary Autosport report and the Black Book both say low oil pressure. DSJ's report says that Taylor reared with "low oil pressure" (his quotes), and the results list the reason for retirement as "-- !! --".
It wouldn't be surprising if Trevor Taylor was unfit after his practice accident.
Posted 14 January 2012 - 15:24
Posted 14 January 2012 - 15:29
Posted 14 January 2012 - 15:34
Posted 14 January 2012 - 15:38
Certainly not 1963. I think David Lawson is correct.I had not noticed the absence of the 'Team Lotus' sign writing Cedric, I wonder how many model makers have ?
Roger I've added a post script to the blog thanks for spotting and letting me know about this error![]()
Meanwhile I was looking at the results page of the 1963 French GP on the 'Official' Formula 1™ website and found the accompanying photo rather interesting, the number on the side of Jim's car looks right but what about the stripe ?
Anyone have any idea's where or even when that photo might have been taken ?