What's wrong with this forum?
#1
Posted 15 March 2000 - 04:22
Perhaps age and the death of too many heroes have curbed our emotions?
Advertisement
#2
Posted 15 March 2000 - 04:55
There is no reason to act like children. We get into some heated discussions but name calling and insults no. And that's the way it should be.
Art NX3L
#3
Posted 15 March 2000 - 05:03
Damn right! - How's Art by the way?
#4
Posted 15 March 2000 - 05:15
And what about his spelling?
At least he has some good memories, even if they are tainted with thoughts of steam trains and huge diesels...
And he doesn't even have a wreck in his backyard to keep the junker going!
Hi Gwen!
------------------
Life and love are mixed with pain...
#5
Posted 15 March 2000 - 05:17
Art has been reincarnated to his old self and the nurse has been fired.
Gwen
#6
Posted 15 March 2000 - 05:25
I shot him this morning! And he has returned as a good guy.This will be Gwens last post.
Gwen
#7
Posted 15 March 2000 - 06:13
Now I just hope Nomad calls so Mark and I can meet up with her before she jets out, lots to tell her...
------------------
Life and love are mixed with pain...
#8
Posted 15 March 2000 - 06:15
#9
Posted 15 March 2000 - 06:16
I still enjoy the current scene but I find myself more detached than I once was. For me it happened after the death of Peterson. Because of all the tragedy we have witnessed we understand how fleeting is life and choose to enjoy it more slowly. What's the point in bashing today’s drivers when they are a pale representation of the drivers we cheered in our youth? Who cares if Mika is better than Michael or visa versa when we have a Moss, Fangio or Clark to think about.
I for one would no longer visit this forum if we became something else nor would we have attracted such people of the stature of Karl Luvigsen or my friends Ray Bell or Barry Lake.
------------------
Regards,
Dennis David
Yahoo = dennis_a_david
Life is racing, the rest is waiting
Grand Prix History
www.ddavid.com/formula1/
[This message has been edited by Dennis David (edited 03-14-2000).]
#10
Posted 15 March 2000 - 06:21
------------------
Regards,
Dennis David
Yahoo = dennis_a_david
Life is racing, the rest is waiting
Grand Prix History
www.ddavid.com/formula1/
#11
Posted 15 March 2000 - 06:23
The people I really appreciate are Yelnats, Desmo, BRG, CVAndrew, Fast One and those others who can throw in facts and figures that have authority.
But I don't really like authority...
And I would like your comments on the AGP of former days thread, f li - is that different or what?
------------------
Life and love are mixed with pain...
#12
Posted 15 March 2000 - 07:30
------------------
"Speed cost money, how fast do you want to go?"
#13
Posted 15 March 2000 - 07:35
Now that we know what's wrong with this forum, it's time for the next question - can we keep it this way? I love the no-backstabbing, no slagging, no namecalling (must I apologize for "calling" Art Gwen?) that exists here. May it live long and prosper!
#14
Posted 15 March 2000 - 15:50
And I must attest, I enjoy the momentary explosion, seen the last about 14 days. But I'm not able to contribute as f.e. Ray does - for not only one reason: First I'm only 42 and complete unknowing, I'm just too young and so I can only learn here; second I always must first translate, what I'm going to say, as you know, and this is a bit slowing down my posting; third I've to work a lot; fourth ...
And Ray, YOU are simply the best! What you brought on AGP is not to strike. Go on and bring more please.
E.T.
#15
Posted 15 March 2000 - 19:19
I appreciate your appreciation! And it is very much reciprocated. Hell, ain't we civilised!
f li
This is a forum for grown-ups (both young and old). There is plenty of room elsewhere in this BB for the more emotional stuff (and most of us sometimes drop in there as well). Opinions here are expressed in a calmer and more measured way, but are every bit as firmly held. What I like is that, with a bit of rational discussion, we can win each other around from time to time, unlike the fanaticism that often pervades Readers Comments.
But we still enjoy ourselves and I hope we don't take ourselves too seriously - I know I don't!
------------------
BRG
"all the time, maximum attack"
#16
Posted 15 March 2000 - 19:52
------------------
"I Was Born Ready"
#17
Posted 15 March 2000 - 19:54
I'll do my reading hear from now on, (with the exception of the games forum ;) ) away from most of the children!
#18
Posted 15 March 2000 - 08:15
We could discuss current affairs as featured in Readers Comments, but without all the noisy children.
Perhaps we'd need some sort of code so that poeple thought we were talking about the Old Days - maybe subtract 50 years from all dates?
:-)
#19
Posted 16 March 2000 - 00:07
I reckon that 1949 was the most interesting year of the 1940s, but I still prefer the racing in the 1920s...
This may take some getting used to....
------------------
BRG
"all the time, maximum attack"
Advertisement
#20
Posted 16 March 2000 - 00:10
#21
Posted 16 March 2000 - 02:28
[This message has been edited by Pete Stanley (edited 03-15-2000).]
#22
Posted 16 March 2000 - 03:00
So sorry to give you a shock, - but this thread really is a celebration of the sane, rational, exchange of ideas and knowledge that was made possible by only because this forum exists.
May it live long and prosper!
#23
Posted 16 March 2000 - 04:38
P.S. Ray- I’ve really enjoyed reading your stuff, even if I occasionally get rather lost. A lot of it takes me way, way back to stories I heard as a kid about the rebirth of American racing after the war- only most of our wildest and wackiest innovation was confined to dirt ovals and drag racing. I wonder if it’s a Southern Hemisphere thing? You guys just seem to have more of an affinity for going around corners than we do.
#24
Posted 16 March 2000 - 10:27
I still check the Readers Forum from time to time, but get turned off by the disrespect and name-calling. This Forum has been a breath of much-needed fresh air, and I thank Don, Dennis, Ray, Kier, f li, BRG, and everyone else for making it that way. Now, if you could all kindly "dumb down" a bit, so I could feel like I'm not in over my head here, I'd appreciate it.
#25
Posted 16 March 2000 - 15:19
You blokes are right, especially the point about 'friends I'd like to have gathered with before.'
What a shame we can't all get together for a big pow-wow.
But then, it might be a disappointment after this!
------------------
Life and love are mixed with pain...
#26
Posted 17 March 2000 - 12:25
My main interests were this Nostalgia forum and the Technical forum. And I can barely make time to keep up with those.
For years I used the Internet only for sending and receiving e-mail because I never was able to find intelligent people with whom to communicate.
Now we have an opportunity to do that, please don't lower the standards. There are plenty of places for other people to go.
#27
Posted 17 March 2000 - 13:56
You can't trust some people, can you?
But seriously, the standard has shot up since December or so, when I first arrived. Not that it was my fault, but look at the people who have come in since - Karl, Keir, Eric and a few others, all of whom are newcomers and all of whom contribute quite a lot. Not Austria, of course, he asks too many questions and makes us all scratch our heads....
------------------
Life and love are mixed with pain...
#28
Posted 17 March 2000 - 15:06
I promise, I Will slow down.
;)
------------------
E.T.
#29
Posted 17 March 2000 - 08:09
Austria - keep asking whatever questions you like...
------------------
Life and love are mixed with pain...
#30
Posted 17 March 2000 - 23:55
------------------
E.T.
#31
Posted 18 March 2000 - 02:40
Any website which has a link on the home-page to
"Weapons of Mass Destruction" is OK by me ;)
#32
Posted 18 January 2008 - 20:59
At the time the forum had perhaps a few dozen followers, the threads numbered in the low 10's and the number of posts might have exceeded the thousand or so mark by this time -- most by Ray judging from this thread....
#33
Posted 18 January 2008 - 21:13
Don, not such a bad idea for all of us to search out some of the older threads.
Henry
#34
Posted 18 January 2008 - 22:17
Much nicer and more interesting on here.
#35
Posted 19 January 2008 - 09:44
Originally posted by HistoricMustang
WOW!
Don, not such a bad idea for all of us to search out some of the older threads.
Henry
HM couldnt agree more, especially when I first joined and its something that every now and again I try to do, however with 17000 + threads I find I can either start at the very beginning and page back or to go one year back. How would I go to thread no 1000 for example without having to go page by page. Is there an easier way
#36
Posted 19 January 2008 - 10:32
I'll tell you what's wrong with this Forum. Everyone here knows way more than me,
So true!
#37
Posted 19 January 2008 - 10:42
Originally posted by zakeriath
HM couldnt agree more, especially when I first joined and its something that every now and again I try to do, however with 17000 + threads I find I can either start at the very beginning and page back or to go one year back. How would I go to thread no 1000 for example without having to go page by page. Is there an easier way
There is an easier way.
Just click here
Now all you need to do is change the thread number at the end of the URL
#39
Posted 19 January 2008 - 13:10
I'll tell you what's wrong with this Forum. Everyone here knows way more than me,
Ditto. Out of all the forums I've witnessed, no other comes close to TNF in terms of having so many experts that are recognised in the field. Not only that, but - unless they're pros in disguise - even the 'amateurs' put my knowledge to shame. I can hold my own against the vast majority of 'petrol heads', but TNF is in a different league.
I'd like to thank the professional historians for putting up with hacks such as myself - we're not worthy!
Justin
#41
Posted 20 January 2008 - 11:19
All in all, the forum gives me a great deal of pleasure and I'm very grateful to you all.
#42
Posted 20 January 2008 - 11:39
#43
Posted 20 January 2008 - 11:49
Examples abound elsewhere as to how not to respond and/or disagree online. Personally I am very grateful and interested in the contributions on TNF not least in my professional capacity as a 'scribbler'.
So thank you one and all for sharing your comments and personal knowledge.
#44
Posted 21 January 2008 - 14:05
#45
Posted 21 January 2008 - 14:26
Don,Originally posted by HDonaldCapps
What is wrong with this forum? That far, far too many here take this forum entirely for granted....
Can you please clarify what you mean?
There was the curious business last week of a thread relating to a ten-year-old topic being, quite rightly, moved by a moderator from Racing Comments to TNF, a practice that is common on other forums and then being deleted by Bira along with one commenting on it being moved. Is your oblique remark related to that?
I accept that if this forum were to disappear it would leave a big gap in my [internet] life. Is there a real risk of this happening or is this simply a stir on your part?
#46
Posted 21 January 2008 - 18:34
#47
Posted 21 January 2008 - 20:30
Is that it? Are you just going to leave it there? Explain............please.
#48
Posted 21 January 2008 - 21:52
#49
Posted 22 January 2008 - 08:53
I do agree that if it is taken for granted (and by that I mean the contributors are taken for granted) then it could well go to the wall. I most certainly hope that it does not!
In the mean time keep posting!
#50
Posted 22 January 2008 - 09:08
By whom? Can we please have some plain speaking here instead of the riddles? I get enough of that with my wife. I've clearly missed something in the 'translation'.