Would his successor ever be anything but a ventriloquist's dummy with Max's hand up his back working his mouth?
no not max's hand
B E is the one who put max in place
and B E will want the dummy to be his guy
Posted 21 June 2009 - 00:17
Would his successor ever be anything but a ventriloquist's dummy with Max's hand up his back working his mouth?
Advertisement
Posted 21 June 2009 - 00:25
Posted 21 June 2009 - 00:32
royalblue0:
Good question since we are not talking about a legal and democratic process. Maybe that just another reason why FOTA needs to ditch both MM and BE AND contest the whole legality of the FIA with the EU. It's not possible to play nice with these two, they need to be taken out once and for all.
Posted 21 June 2009 - 00:35
no not max's hand
B E is the one who put max in place
and B E will want the dummy to be his guy
Posted 21 June 2009 - 00:54
Posted 21 June 2009 - 01:03
FIA owns the F1 Championship, Bernie (or CVC rather) owns the commercial rights. I don't see the teams having any right to either of FIA's and CVC'c stakes. Lets say F1 would have been so lucrative that the teams in fact would have been making money on the racing itself through sponsors, would it have been right for Bernie to request that the teams would pay CVC? Or would it have been right for FIA to require the teams to pay an ever increasing amount of money depending on their commercial success? If the teams want more of the pie, they can go and buy the rights (if the competition laws would admit, but I am sure there would be some sort of structure making that possible without locking out new teams).
Edited by J2NH, 21 June 2009 - 01:04.
Posted 21 June 2009 - 01:06
Posted 21 June 2009 - 01:19
Posted 21 June 2009 - 01:24
Thanks for the transcript DMN.
With a piece of one-sided tirade against an enemy characterised as "loonies" it's no wonder Max has not been able to facilitate useful solutions for many years. His idea of leadership is more akin to the headmaster at an old English public school with undertones of physical punishment. His piece shows how intractable the FIA - FOTA debate is going to be while he is there. When his barrister speak loosens up he slips into his true ideology of "his" property. I am not going to wade through it again because it is all so tiresomely Max. He treats F1 as his personal plaything and the performers are dispensible loonies. "we don't need Ferrari" etc and then threatens them from going away to do their own thing.
Nobody in their right mind would paint the teams as a saintly mob but the conciliatory noises from them sound in stark contrast to that pile of self-righteous bovine faeces.
Posted 21 June 2009 - 03:12
Posted 21 June 2009 - 05:50
Posted 21 June 2009 - 06:07
Where is the new team list that on Friday Max Mosley promised to put up by Saturday?
Seriously what can I expect from a guy that makes a promise about a simple list, and doesn't deliver it?
Preparations for the 2010 FIA Formula One World Championship continue but publication of the final 2010 entry list will be put on hold while the FIA asserts its legal rights.
Posted 21 June 2009 - 06:08
Max is spot on about somebody trying to take what´s not theirs. What amazes me is that there are people on here who think he should just surrender what he and Bernie have built up over the past 20 years. You might not like the fact that they own and control F1, but that is not the point. They do. Live with it. If FOTA want to be an effective influence in the greater scheme of things, they would be well advised to remember the old saying, slowly, slowly catch the monkey.
Posted 21 June 2009 - 06:12
Posted 21 June 2009 - 06:29
I agree. I got the impression from the interview that the reporter was in some kind of awe of Mosley and I notice that he even severely fluffed up his questions several times. There was no occasion where Mosley was pressed with questions a la Paxman. What the BBC don't realise is that the majority of viewers want to see someone really taken to task for this - the 'FOTA rules' banners and T-shirts prove this because people are even going to these kind of lengths to show their anger.
Instead we have a reporter fawning over Mosley an other reporters making do with Bernie's typical 'I don't know' response to every question. The BBC reporters may well be thinking they are so lucky that they have the privilege to speak to Mosley an Bernie ( ) but the reality is that they look unprofessional on-air. More to the point, the viewers will notice that they are not doing them service.
As I have already mentioned in this thread, one question about Mosley's legal action is how he can justify suing FOTA when he never sued the GPWC but this was never asked. How about asking him the general matter of how reasonable it is for a governing body to sue its participants or why the FIA let Ecclestone get away with F1's rights for just a few million dollars per year. 'Answer the question Mr Mosley' is what I want to hear.
Posted 21 June 2009 - 07:20
Posted 21 June 2009 - 07:38
It took Mosley a few questions before he let his stiff upper lip slip and revert to what I believe is more along the lines of how he thinks.What they want is a Formula 1 World Championship - but belonging to them. It's a bit of tug of war but in the end, because it is ours and the commercial rights are Bernie's, we will win the tug of war and they will then come and race in the World Championship as normal.
Posted 21 June 2009 - 09:40
No... What he chooses to do in his spare time is his affair. What is more relevant is the way he he runs the sport that we all love.You don't thnk it is relevant that he pretends to be a Nazi prison guard? Really?
Advertisement
Posted 21 June 2009 - 10:11
I guess things are ready for round 2:
Stephen Sackur vs Max Mosley
Posted 21 June 2009 - 10:55
Max is spot on about somebody trying to take what´s not theirs. What amazes me is that there are people on here who think he should just surrender what he and Bernie have built up over the past 20 years. You might not like the fact that they own and control F1, but that is not the point. They do. Live with it. If FOTA want to be an effective influence in the greater scheme of things, they would be well advised to remember the old saying, slowly, slowly catch the monkey.
Posted 21 June 2009 - 10:56
I can only assume you're living in a world where the teams are trying to take over F1; in the world the rest of us live in they want to start a new series.
By your definition a coup d'état is a group of people forming a rival political party. It isn't.
Posted 21 June 2009 - 11:50
You are confusing politeness with humility. The BBC interviewer, as far as I read the transcript, asked the questions that needed to be asked. And gave Mosley the opportunity to answer. The interviewer asked Mosley three times if him leaving the FIA would not possible solve the crisis. And ofcourse Mosley did not anwser that. What should the interviewer have done? Twist his arm?
You don't have a problem witht the contents of the interview, you only think that. What you call 'fluffing' up is how people in the real world talk to eachother. It is a little bit different from bulletinboards and televisionscreens. I admire Jeremy Paxman, but his method is not always the best way.
Edited by TimEaston, 21 June 2009 - 11:52.
Posted 21 June 2009 - 11:53
Posted 21 June 2009 - 12:00
Posted 21 June 2009 - 12:44
RTL just showed a long interview with Mosley, conducted by Niki Lauda.
Mosley speaks incredible German, fluent and almost totally flawless.
Posted 21 June 2009 - 13:08
Of course he would, he's a Nazi. Duh.
Posted 21 June 2009 - 13:16
It was quite impressive. He must have lived here at some point.
Posted 21 June 2009 - 13:44
It was quite impressive. He must have lived here at some point.
Posted 21 June 2009 - 13:45
RTL just showed a long interview with Mosley, conducted by Niki Lauda.
Mosley speaks incredible German, fluent and almost totally flawless.
Posted 21 June 2009 - 14:00
mosley in brazilian tv: its not hard to reach an agreement. we know what everybody wants. my intention was leave fia in october but i cant do it in the middle of a crisis.
Posted 21 June 2009 - 14:02
Posted 21 June 2009 - 18:03
PS how exactly did Bernie buy a business with 1.6b annual turnover for 300m?
Posted 21 June 2009 - 18:15
I thought that Jake Humphrey asked all the correct questions. I just feel he should have probed Bernie on Max's comments about the loonies. Max might think FOTA is run by loonies but you don't just say that in public.
Edited by Chezrome, 21 June 2009 - 18:15.
Posted 21 June 2009 - 18:15
every interview with max is about budget caps, every inteview with FOTA is about gorvernance.
if they're not even talking about the same thing how can they be close to a compromise?
Posted 21 June 2009 - 19:45
Posted 21 June 2009 - 20:34
I am very surprised that none have picked up on that Jake, in one of his interviews with Mosley, was wearing a Black Shirt.
Posted 21 June 2009 - 20:49
Typical dictatorial excuse. He just forgot to mention who created the crisis and did everything to stir it up.
Posted 21 June 2009 - 21:09
Possibly because the content was more important then the colour of Jake's shirt.