
Is Button's likely Championship tainted?
#1
Posted 03 October 2009 - 14:26
Advertisement
#2
Posted 03 October 2009 - 14:30
I am Jenson sympathizer, but don't you think Jenson's likely championship is tainted by the way he has been outperformed by Barrichello in the 2nd half of the season? If JB had had his slump in the 1st part, one could have credited him at least with gaining the momentum, but now, with Brawn ever more disappearing into the midfield, it hurts to see the future champion coming across so mediocre. Strange situation and honestly a kind of anticlimax for f1 and us fans.
I agree.
Also.. I just made a reply in the Hamilton to Brawn thread about my views on the reasons for this.
I really wanted JB to tear it up this season given his start and the lack of action from McLaren (the team I root for).. but he just is limping over the line, isn't it?
J
EDIT :: I don't think his championship will be "tainted".. just that he is making a real hash of things..
Edited by Jay, 03 October 2009 - 14:44.
#3
Posted 03 October 2009 - 14:37
#4
Posted 03 October 2009 - 14:38
#5
Posted 03 October 2009 - 14:39
#6
Posted 03 October 2009 - 14:39
#7
Posted 03 October 2009 - 14:40
I am Jenson sympathizer, but don't you think Jenson's likely championship is tainted by the way he has been outperformed by Barrichello in the 2nd half of the season?
Not at all. Jenson has scored the most points (so far) and done nothing wrong personally. It is not his fault if others suck more than he does over the full season. The only questionable thing is really Barcelona for me, where it certainly seemed like Brawn screwed Rubens' strategy in order to help Jenson win.
The only way a championship (or a race) can be tainted is if they cheat (for a team), or if you have unfair advantage e.g. #1 status in your team (for a driver). You have to win fair (no cheating) and with equal status, otherwise there are always question marks over anything you 'achieve'.
#8
Posted 03 October 2009 - 14:42
You seem to misunderstand what winning the WDC is about.I am Jenson sympathizer, but don't you think Jenson's likely championship is tainted by the way he has been outperformed by Barrichello in the 2nd half of the season? If JB had had his slump in the 1st part, one could have credited him at least with gaining the momentum, but now, with Brawn ever more disappearing into the midfield, it hurts to see the future champion coming across so mediocre. Strange situation and honestly a kind of anticlimax for f1 and us fans.
It is about winning the most points over the course of a season. A WDC is not "tainted" if he fails to win every race of the season or fails to out-perform his teammate in every race of the season.
The momentum at the beginning or end of the season is irrelevant. It is how you have done over the course of the season, irrespective of any trends within it.
#9
Posted 03 October 2009 - 14:44
diffuser + second half of the season = less than inspiring to say the least.


diffuser gave him a big advantage, screwing RB on pit stops even more, and then the other teams catch up, and JB can not even outrun RB due to necessary changes in handling for the Brawn cars to remain competitive...........
Yep, he will be a great wdc.

#10
Posted 03 October 2009 - 14:44
#11
Posted 03 October 2009 - 14:47
#12
Posted 03 October 2009 - 14:48
Edited by Madras, 03 October 2009 - 14:50.
#13
Posted 03 October 2009 - 14:49
No body is saying he is.He's not the complete driver like Schumacher, Alonso or Hamilton.
#14
Posted 03 October 2009 - 14:51
Odd????? not at all, just demonstrating it was all car......i canot recall a single season where the one who was wdc was not a challenger through out, (or was such a whinger as jennie.....ever )He's won 6gp this season, that's as many/more than anyone in the previous 2 seasons... it just happend that the Brawn was dominent to start with and he got all his wins in one go... so not tainted, just a bit odd.
#15
Posted 03 October 2009 - 14:53
Anyway havent we had this thread already ?
#16
Posted 03 October 2009 - 14:54
Odd????? not at all, just demonstrating it was all car......i canot recall a single season where the one who was wdc was not a challenger through out, (or was such a whinger as jennie.....ever )

#17
Posted 03 October 2009 - 14:55
If he carried on his early season form all year, he would only be winning it because of the car. A poor second half of the season and hes not fit or worthy.
The fact is, he won 6 GP this year which is plenty to take the title. He hasnt made any driving mistakes yet this year which is more than can be said for the last few champions. His perfomrance may have dropped off but Im not convinced that hes been comfortably outpaced by Rubens since the UK, its conicided with a drop off in the form of the car.
He did a far better job than Rubens in the last race but it seem to count for nothing.
He wont be the most naturally talented world champion, but he will be worthy on the basis of his early season performance.
I think a lot of people get used to hearing Alonso/Hamilton/Vettel/Kubica/Raikkonen/Massa in the media and being regarded as the best and just assume any champions outside this anointed group have fluked it.
#18
Posted 03 October 2009 - 14:56
He was going to get criticised for winning it no matter what.
If he carried on his early season form all year, he would only be winning it because of the car. A poor second half of the season and hes not fit or worthy.
The fact is, he won 6 GP this year which is plenty to take the title. He hasnt made any driving mistakes yet this year which is more than can be said for the last few champions. His perfomrance may have dropped off but Im not convinced that hes been comfortably outpaced by Rubens since the UK, its conicided with a drop off in the form of the car.
Yeah that's how Rubens managed to win 2 races.
#19
Posted 03 October 2009 - 14:57
Advertisement
#20
Posted 03 October 2009 - 14:57
No, if you score the most points and win the most races, you deserve it.
Mathematically speaking, of course. But emotionally, it's like the orgasm coming early on and then waiting out the remaining 20 min. I can't remember when a wingman so much outshone the emerging champion.
#21
Posted 03 October 2009 - 15:00
#22
Posted 03 October 2009 - 15:02
http://forums.autosp...howtopic=113885
http://forums.autosp...howtopic=115896

#23
Posted 03 October 2009 - 15:03
#24
Posted 03 October 2009 - 15:04
No Button has won it fair and square. Crashgate has, however, tainted Hamilton's 2008 title.
He hasn't won it yet.........

#25
Posted 03 October 2009 - 15:05
#26
Posted 03 October 2009 - 15:05
The fact is, he won 6 GP this year which is plenty to take the title. He hasnt made any driving mistakes yet this year which is more than can be said for the last few champions.
Good point. On the other hand, we all know that JB's points cushion is greatly helpt by Brawn slumping into the upper midfield, to 5th, 6th or 7th. Now when RB beats JB, all he can hope for is minimizing the gap by 1,2,3 points, whereas in the early season Button could capitalize from Barrichello's off-days with 5-10 points.
Rubens is not worse than Button this season on one on one basis, he just has to blame himself that he wasn't there when he could have capitalized from Brawn's superiority.
Edited by holiday, 03 October 2009 - 15:06.
#27
Posted 03 October 2009 - 15:07
JB simply got the benefit of the better pit strategy---which was another example of who Ross wants to win the WDC...bad form to have your winner wander off, esp. when sponsor money is tight...........only Frank, for whatever reason, would choose to run off the WDC of his team immediately after he won it.....(Remeber damon)He did a far better job than Rubens in the last race but it seem to count for nothing.
.
Edited by Just waiting, 03 October 2009 - 15:08.
#28
Posted 03 October 2009 - 15:07
That is why Button has a 15 point lead.he just has to blame himself that he wasn't there when he could have capitalized from Brawn's superiority.[/b]
Edited by Brawn BGP 001, 03 October 2009 - 15:08.
#29
Posted 03 October 2009 - 15:08
#30
Posted 03 October 2009 - 15:09
Right.JB simply got the benefit of the better pit strategy---which was another example of who Ross wants to win the WDC...bad form to have your winner wander off, esp. when sponsor money is tight...........only Frank, for whatever reason, would choose to run off the WDC of his team immediately after he won it.....(Remeber damon)

#31
Posted 03 October 2009 - 15:11
The FIA, Williams and Toyota disagree.Jeson won his first races with an illegal car,

#32
Posted 03 October 2009 - 15:11
That is why Button has a 15 point lead.
True. But if f1 were boxing, both drivers would have won about the same amount of rounds and that counts a lot in my book. It says that Button in 2009 was a better driver than Barrichello when Brawn was head and shoulders above the other teams, but it does not say that Button was a better driver than Barrichello in the course of the season. Which he wasn't. That's what I would call disappointing, if not somehow tainted.
#33
Posted 03 October 2009 - 15:14
Right.
thanks, about time u saw the truth
The answer is simple. The handling of the car was tailored to fit JB. No sensitve twitchy oversterr....not much like how RB wanted it, plus lots of sharing of info on set up...all due to the diffuser early advantage
other teams catch up, and we have JB weaving in a race to keep his tires hot....

Handling is adjusted to be competitive, maybe RB does not share like he did........and suddenly Jennie is now below average...way below.......

Edited by Just waiting, 03 October 2009 - 15:15.
#34
Posted 03 October 2009 - 15:14
I agree the RB has been stronger in the second half of the season and in some races (Valencia, Silverstone) he was ahead of JB, but IMO Button deserves it that little bit more due to the early season domination.True. But if f1 were boxing, both drivers would have won about the same amount of rounds and that counts a lot in my book. It says that Button in 2009 was a better driver than Barrichello when Brawn was head and shoulders above the other teams, but it does not say that Button was a better driver than Barrichello in the course of the season. Which he wasn't. That's what I would call disappointing, if not somehow tainted.
#35
Posted 03 October 2009 - 15:16
#36
Posted 03 October 2009 - 15:16
No Button has won it fair and square. Crashgate has, however, tainted Hamilton's 2008 title.
Gah, we get it, you hate Lewis.
Welcome to my ignore list.
#37
Posted 03 October 2009 - 15:16
Button has had his hands on a couple of good cars in the past and pretty much made the most of them in years dominated by Ferrari. To somehow suggest that this year's challenge is just down to the Brawn car being unfairly fast early on is ludicrous. He has a damn good car and has driven it as fast as it will go. He and Barrichello have been evenly matched, he made more of it in the first half of the season, Rubens seems ahead now. McLaren, Red Bull, and on occasion, Ferrari and Force India, have been quicker over the second half of the season, but no-one has made serious inroads into Button's lead.
The guy who gets the most points wins. Simple as that. Button has more points and more wins than anyone. Just because he won early rather than a late-season charge doesn't devalue his potential win any more than Barrichello would not deserve a Championship for being slower than Button until Silverstone.
It's the same as the debate that any victory in football somehow isn't worthy unless it's one of the big teams, that a Portsmouth-Cardiff Cup final wasn't worthy of viewing because Manchester United or Chelsea weren't in it.
Celebrate the fact that a bloody hopeless team like Honda could, with a fair degree of luck in the form of that mercedes engine, can come to the fore. Thank God Ferrari haven't steamrollered everyone for the umpteenth time, and as I'm sure they will again soon.
Rant over...go and read some books about life before 1999.
#38
Posted 03 October 2009 - 15:16
Imaginary rabbits were a bitch too.screwing RB on pit stops even more,
#39
Posted 03 October 2009 - 15:16
Handling is adjusted to be competitive, maybe RB does not share like he did........and suddenly Jennie is now below average...way below.......
You actually believe this?
The way you mock another persons name like a child is a good indication of your judgment in any case...
Advertisement
#40
Posted 03 October 2009 - 15:25
Really, if he wins the championship no one will care in years to come about his slump. In fact, if he was to finish this year with a win or two, people will be saying he is one of the best out there. Champions always look great in the majorities eye.
#41
Posted 03 October 2009 - 15:26
This thread is very thinly disguised JB bashing thread and remarks like 'Jenson sympathiser' do not cut it with me.
Another stupid thread.
#42
Posted 03 October 2009 - 15:27
For me, Jenson's perceived drop off in form is a combination of quite a few things, but I'll throw out a few:
- A driver defending a shrinking but reasonably comfortable points lead has more to loose, and consciously or subconsciously this will affect their approach to races. A driver chasing down a large points gap has less to loose and will typically start racing for more points, or fail trying.
- Button openly struggles a little more with a car that is twitchier at the back than Rubens, and also at generating tyre temp if ambient temps are down, both have been an issue in the 2nd half of the year.
- While the Brawn has lost some ground to the field, Rubens has found some improvements in the brakes relative to his early season, therefore his relative performance to Jenson has improved, BUT the Brawns dominating performance has gone.
- The Brawn can now only be classed as 'one of the best cars', depending on track, tyres, ambient temp/weather. This means it's easier to be the same or similar on overall pace to your teammate, but easier to get embroiled in battles with other cars, depending on a bad qualifying or a bad start, pit stop, etc. and end up looking like a bad race.
I wouldn't see the Championship as tainted whoever wins in. I'd be happiest if Jenson wins it, but would also be happy for Rubens. Vettel definitely has much potential in the future for Championships, but if he manages a huge point swing i the last 3 races, and Jenson and Rubens have a disastrous few races, then I would guess he deserves it also.
I don't see how the championship would be tainted whoever wins it, as long as they don't pull any Adelaide '94 or Jerez '97 type stunts.
What is unusual about this Championship is that the rule shakeup has given an early chance to some small teams (Brawn and Red Bull) and the usual players were left playing catch up. We're left with a Championship being contended between those early leaders, but they're now mixing it with the usual drivers who are out of the championship, but fancy the wins. I see this as more interesting, rather than tainted.
#43
Posted 03 October 2009 - 15:27
Celebrate the fact that a bloody hopeless team like Honda could, with a fair degree of luck in the form of that mercedes engine, can come to the fore.
Agree on this..
The rest of your post is a tad acidic for me to decipher.
I get your point, but...
#44
Posted 03 October 2009 - 15:30
I think there are so many drivers today that are better than him which essentially means that F1 is not about who the best driver is throughout the season but who has the best car throughout the season.. Last year for example Kubica was the best driver but he could not win because his car was not quick enough..
Edited by BMW_F1, 03 October 2009 - 15:31.
#45
Posted 03 October 2009 - 15:34
#46
Posted 03 October 2009 - 15:36
It's not the most glorious way to win a championship but it doesn't really matter at this point.
#47
Posted 03 October 2009 - 15:38
Jenson had a very dominant car for a great part of the season. We all know what he can do when his car is the best of the field - he delivers.. but when the car is no longer that dominant, as a driver, he does not make any difference. He becomes another Trulli..
I think there are so many drivers today that are better than him which essentially means that F1 is not about who the best driver is throughout the season but who has the best car throughout the season.. Last year for example Kubica was the best driver but he could not win because his car was not quick enough..
That's the nature of the sport. The best drivers normally end up in the best cars though (Senna, Schumacher, etc). This year has just been an anomaly.
As for the topic, Button deserves the WDC 100%. He nailed it when his car was the class of the field. He may be limping over the line, but despite all the gifts he has handed out none of his pursuers have been able to significantly close the gap.
#48
Posted 03 October 2009 - 15:41
I am Jenson sympathizer, but don't you think Jenson's likely championship is tainted by the way he has been outperformed by Barrichello in the 2nd half of the season?
No.
Alternative option - Barrichello wins despite being utterly dominated for the first half of the season.
Next question.
#49
Posted 03 October 2009 - 15:44
Jenson had a very dominant car for a great part of the season. We all know what he can do when his car is the best of the field - he delivers.. but when the car is no longer that dominant, as a driver, he does not make any difference. He becomes another Trulli..
I think there are so many drivers today that are better than him which essentially means that F1 is not about who the best driver is throughout the season but who has the best car throughout the season.. Last year for example Kubica was the best driver but he could not win because his car was not quick enough..
This is exactly what I mean, silly fanboys with their "expert" opinion. Formula One has always been a team sport, the combination of car and driver. Unless two drivers are in the same car you cannot compare them, other than by looking at their qualifying positions and points. By what measure was Kubica the "best" driver? Most Polish? Fastest in a BMW that isn't called Nick?
#50
Posted 03 October 2009 - 15:45
what does that anything do with what we are discussing here.. Button from what I know has never been in serious consideration by Ferrari or Maclaren . When Williams was a top team he was replaced. When Renault was a top team he was replaced.. This tells me a lot of about Button..That's the nature of the sport. The best drivers normally end up in the best cars though (Senna, Schumacher, etc). This year has just been an anomaly.
As for the topic, Button deserves the WDC 100%. He nailed it when his car was the class of the field. He may be limping over the line, but despite all the gifts he has handed out none of his pursuers have been able to significantly close the gap..
he does deserve it becase as I mentioned the WDC does not necessarily go to the best driver in the field I've been ok with that as it is the nature of F1. - more car /less driver..