Bernie proposes shortcuts and other stuff...
#1
Posted 13 January 2010 - 19:37
Well, what do you think?
To me it seems like he's been playing a bit of Mario Kart.
#3
Posted 13 January 2010 - 19:39
http://uk.eurosport....-shortcuts.html
Well, what do you think?
To me it seems like he's been playing a bit of Mario Kart.
A load of bo***cks.
#4
Posted 13 January 2010 - 19:42
"I've tried to push the teams with a number of proposals. Imagine a shortcut which a driver can use five times every race. It would stop people getting stuck behind others. It would be good for TV"
#5
Posted 13 January 2010 - 19:43
#6
Posted 13 January 2010 - 19:45
#7
Posted 13 January 2010 - 19:45
#8
Posted 13 January 2010 - 19:48
What's next? A tournament in competitive eating on Sunday mornings? Mental arithmetic knock-out on Thursdays? Singing contests?
Ridiculous....
#9
Posted 13 January 2010 - 19:49
#10
Posted 13 January 2010 - 19:49
#11
Posted 13 January 2010 - 19:50
#12
Posted 13 January 2010 - 19:50
"Ecclestone, who laughed and joked with Alonso after a day's skiing..."
Er, so was Bernie skiing? If so, that's damned impressive at his age!
#13
Posted 13 January 2010 - 19:52
Lewis has already used all his 2010 shortcuts in 2008 and 2009Hamilton will not be allowed to cut the chicane. If he does this will result in the FIA handing out a post race 25s penalty to Lewis, even if he gave the position back.
Serious now:
The only one taking shortcuts should be the driver of the car driving Bernie to the mental clinic.
Off course this won't happen:
Poor people are crazy / demented, rich people are excentric
Edited by Racing Dutchman, 13 January 2010 - 19:54.
#14
Posted 13 January 2010 - 19:57
I got this idea when washing my hair with tar shampoo
#15
Posted 13 January 2010 - 19:57
Senile shortarse spitballs stupid shortcuts!
#16
Posted 13 January 2010 - 20:02
We have had go faster buttons that did not work. Next he will be coming up with a stun button where once a lap you can press a button and take 20bhp off the car in front for five or ten seconds.
#17
Posted 13 January 2010 - 20:03
#18
Posted 13 January 2010 - 20:03
#19
Posted 13 January 2010 - 20:05
#21
Posted 13 January 2010 - 20:11
#22
Posted 13 January 2010 - 20:18
*sigh*
What's next? A tournament in competitive eating on Sunday mornings? Mental arithmetic knock-out on Thursdays? Singing contests?
Ridiculous....
All of the above are insanely stupid, except singing, now there's a great idea!! can you imagine, And next up we have adrian sutil with his version of Wham' s Wake me up before you go go
#23
Posted 13 January 2010 - 20:20
#24
Posted 13 January 2010 - 20:25
#25
Posted 13 January 2010 - 20:26
*sigh*
What's next? A tournament in competitive eating on Sunday mornings? Mental arithmetic knock-out on Thursdays? Singing contests?
Ridiculous....
Nah, some drink driving could mix things up. Kimi will then come back, and win with ease and LdM will uncork all wine bottles he has, cry in them and become and alcoholic. All drivers normaly 100 % sober will undoubtedly crash
#26
Posted 13 January 2010 - 20:33
#27
Posted 13 January 2010 - 20:43
You all should be worried about what will actually be changed next week to artificially 'spice up the show'.
Points for poles and fastest laps, pitstops for no reason, etc..
#28
Posted 13 January 2010 - 20:45
#29
Posted 13 January 2010 - 20:46
Bernie, you genius!
#30
Posted 13 January 2010 - 20:57
#31
Posted 13 January 2010 - 20:57
gonna be messyWho cares about this senile nonsense... there's no way in hell they would adopt shortcuts.
You all should be worried about what will actually be changed next week to artificially 'spice up the show'.
Points for poles and fastest laps, pitstops for no reason, etc..
#32
Posted 13 January 2010 - 20:58
Meh, I gave up on FOTA/FIA doing something sensible ages ago. Anyway, it's not like they could make things any worse. Right?Who cares about this senile nonsense... there's no way in hell they would adopt shortcuts.
You all should be worried about what will actually be changed next week to artificially 'spice up the show'.
Points for poles and fastest laps, pitstops for no reason, etc..
#33
Posted 13 January 2010 - 20:59
Would you rather watch the borefest procession of Valencia with one to two seconds always between every car? Or see the odd shortcut being taken? It's the wrong way to go about it but it definitely would be good for TV, the old man is right.
I was pointing out in 96 how crap the overtaking situation was getting. 14 years later and we are no better off. And now this.
#34
Posted 13 January 2010 - 21:01
#35
Posted 13 January 2010 - 21:12
#36
Posted 13 January 2010 - 21:25
#37
Posted 13 January 2010 - 21:25
Qualy would also be spiced up, with drivers deciding which route they prefer for maximum lap time.
#38
Posted 13 January 2010 - 21:33
#39
Posted 13 January 2010 - 21:35
Advertisement
#40
Posted 13 January 2010 - 21:39
I think ditching the speed limiter and making the cars go through the pits on each lap would make some awesome TV. Who's with me?
As long as the mechanics all wore their health and safety high vis vests!!
#41
Posted 13 January 2010 - 21:39
I think it shows how far down F1 has reached because his proposals, to be fair, would liven up some races.
Would you rather watch the borefest procession of Valencia with one to two seconds always between every car? Or see the odd shortcut being taken? It's the wrong way to go about it but it definitely would be good for TV, the old man is right.
I was pointing out in 96 how crap the overtaking situation was getting. 14 years later and we are no better off. And now this.
First of all Bernie is nuts!!!
Secondly, many people reminisce about the "golden years" of F1, but the reality is that in the past we had borefests where the leader was in another timezone and the cars were separated by 10 to 15 seconds. Now we have grids where the top 10 are covered by .5 of a second and yet people expect passing to be easy. I know I'll be tarred a feathered for saying this, but I think it's unreasonable to expect cars that are virtually identical in performance to be able to pass each other with ease. The overtaking problem is part car, part track, part rules, and part audience expectations. IMO, something's got to give.
#42
Posted 13 January 2010 - 21:40
No, really, what a beyond stupid idea.
#43
Posted 13 January 2010 - 21:41
#44
Posted 13 January 2010 - 21:48
Sorry but this thread/story is stupid. Xxx
#45
Posted 13 January 2010 - 22:11
Actually it is not the the policemen, it is our freaking government.It like some police man in Dutch land tolerating the smoke in order to surface the dealing route. Well if this works is another question. For sure not for Chilac..
Trust me, that isn't their worst decision.
If Bernie ever wants to retire from F1 he is extremely suited for Dutch politics.
Bunch of clowns
#46
Posted 13 January 2010 - 22:58
#47
Posted 13 January 2010 - 23:54
Edited by Bloggsworth, 13 January 2010 - 23:54.
#48
Posted 14 January 2010 - 00:12
#49
Posted 14 January 2010 - 00:20
First of all, the idea of a short cut isn’t going to work. I don’t see how you could reasonably enforce it, unless you’re intending to disqualify a driver uses it too often. And secondly, it would be a very cheap form of passing. Thirdly, what is there to stop the race leader taking the short cut for the first five laps and dialling out a huge lead? There would be drives who would feel obliged to follow, so the end result would be that you'd have two groups of cars separated by thirty seconds after just five laps - the kind of gap that a leader takes half a race to develop. Fourthly, it would just be confusing for everyone. Can you imagine Johnathan Legard trying to remember who is where? I can barely trust him to tell the difference between a Red Bull and a Toro Rosso (yes, I know they're the same colour - but a Red Bull is at the front, a Toro Rosso is at th back).
But there may be a solution, as wild as it sounds: a split circuit. Here’s the idea: I’ve been following you and I just can’t get past no matter what I try. As we come up to the split section, you go left and I go right. The split would be a mirror image of itself: exactly the same length, consisting of exactly the same layout. And they’d be fairly short. It becomes a race to see who can clear that section faster. They’d also be very close together so that the fans could see who was racing who the entire time.
The obvious downside is that the split section would have to be in the middle of a straight. You couldn’t stick it too close to an actual bend, because then one would have a better racing line and no-one would use the other. And there’s the obvious hazard of a divider sticking up in the middle of a circuit; I don’t want to imagine what would happen if someone hit it. Then again, you could get around that by having road markings so that the cars get split long before the actual barrier appears.
Of course, it would never take. People want to see passing actual passing that is a result of skill, not because a driver takes a shortcut.
#50
Posted 14 January 2010 - 00:25
1. The short-cuts must have 'traffic-calming' speed-bumps.
2. Any part of the circuit, including the short-cuts may be coned off for roadworks for 10 laps per race.
3. Entering the pit-lane will incur a congestion charge.
4. Stopping in a pit-box constitutes parking and must be paid for at the time via mobile phone.
5. Each lap, there will be a one-in-ten chance of the pit-lane becoming a red-route (no stopping allowed).
6. For half of each race the short-cut route must become a contra-flow.
7. The drivers will be informed of all changes via a 'sat-nav' in the cockpit. Which will always be 20 minutes late in updating.
That should bring about more overtaking, or at least cause more road-rage.