This flag is better, and it is simple like a proper flag (or helmet design) should be... it is a proper flag that a 5-year old could draw (like the French, Italian etc ones). 5-year olds struggle to draw the complex stars on the Australian flag. This flag on the other hand is for the original (specifically, true) owners of "Terra Australis" or "Van Dieman's Land":
http://www.ausflag.c...u/images/ab.gif
Anyhow, we make do with this flag as a "second" flag and Waltzing Matilda as a "second" anthem, even though they are far superior to the official ones. Wealth of choice.
1. The original Aboriginal people considered themselves guardians and custodians of this land, not owners. The "owners" thing is a relatively recent development agitated by people who would rather see a divide remain between Australians.
2. I have yet to meet a five year old who cannot make a rough approximation of our flag - and I have met a LOT of five year olds, which is par for the course when you do practical experience in a preschool and kindergarten class. Because a five year old would be unable to correctly reproduce the coat of arms on the Spanish flag, should the Spaniards change theirs? Because a five year old gets confused about the order of colours on the German flag, should the Germans change theirs? I am 23 for heaven's sake and I still get confused about the order of colours on the French and Italian flags.
3. I have no objection to royal blue with white stars. And like it or not, the Union Jack represents part of our history. You may not like it but it is the TRUTH.
4. Waltzing Matilda is NOT an anthem. It is a folk song. A rather nice one, but it is not an anthem, and nor should it be. Waltzing Maltilda was actually presented as an option when the referendum was held to determine Australia's national anthem. Advance Australia Fair STILL WON.
Sometimes I feel like I'm the only Australian in the world who actually likes our flag and our anthem.