Formula 4 Series.
#1
Posted 12 September 2012 - 09:04
http://www.msvracing...p-for-2013.aspx
MotorSport Vision (MSV) has announced a groundbreaking new junior single seater series for launch in 2013. The new championship, named Formula 4, has been created to provide a much needed modern low cost series aimed at those starting single seater racing and a stepping stone to higher formulae.
The cars, which will be known as MSV F4-013, will be powered by the cost effective and proven 2 litre Ford Duratec engine, developing 175bhp and featuring a Cosworth engine management system. The gearbox will be more sophisticated than any previous car at this level, being a 6 speed Sadev transmission incorporating paddle shift. Cosworth will also supply the gearbox control system. The cars will run on slick and wet compound tyres provided by Yokohama.
Advertisement
#2
Posted 12 September 2012 - 12:02
#3
Posted 12 September 2012 - 12:40
#4
Posted 12 September 2012 - 13:39
BRDC President Derek Warwick commented: "I have been very worried over the last few years about how our young British drivers of the future are supposed to make that big move from karting to circuit racing. Back in the day there was a relatively simple ladder if you had the talent; Formula Ford, Formula 3, Formula 2 and then Formula 1 if you were good enough. We currently have total confusion within our sport in terms of formulae, cost and the best way to gain experience in a cost effective way.
... the best way to solve that problem?? ANOTHER CLASS lol
Edited by rhukkas, 12 September 2012 - 13:40.
#5
Posted 12 September 2012 - 13:41
The fact it is BRDC backed says to me it should be successful.
#6
Posted 12 September 2012 - 13:42
#7
Posted 12 September 2012 - 13:45
Edited by hunnylander, 12 September 2012 - 13:45.
#8
Posted 12 September 2012 - 13:57
Great, another overpriced and unnecessary championship.
The cost of participation is expected to range from £35,000 for a private entrant to £70,000 for a professional team.
For modern standards thats not that expensive, don't get me wrong its not dirt cheap either.
The idea is right, the lower formulas need to be much more cost effective but the fact its another different series only results in diluting both its own and other series worth.
I wish that the FIA or BRDC or someone would do something about the different series available at each rung of the motorsport ladder. In an ideal (therefore impossible!) world i think it needs to be a little more like - (Using the old school names for simplicity)
F1>>>>>F2 International series>>>>>F3 international series>>F3 national series>>>>>F4 national series
Or something similar, either way we need less series at the same level.
#9
Posted 12 September 2012 - 14:16
For modern standards thats not that expensive, don't get me wrong its not dirt cheap either.
The idea is right, the lower formulas need to be much more cost effective but the fact its another different series only results in diluting both its own and other series worth.
I wish that the FIA or BRDC or someone would do something about the different series available at each rung of the motorsport ladder. In an ideal (therefore impossible!) world i think it needs to be a little more like - (Using the old school names for simplicity)
F1>>>>>F2 International series>>>>>F3 international series>>F3 national series>>>>>F4 national series
Or something similar, either way we need less series at the same level.
While I doubt the projected costs, it doesn't matter how cheap a class is if no-one is looking. You do a year and then disappear. F4 will go down as another class that some 'cash-strapped' will have no choice but to race in.
The main issues is that if the main goal is 'F1' then you will get this continued destruction of so-called lower formula. You can't have a recognised ladder to F1 without costs going through the roof. We have whole countries sponsoring drivers now, and that means they will afford and spend the required amount.
#10
Posted 12 September 2012 - 14:33
#11
Posted 12 September 2012 - 14:34
This seems beyond pointless and just seems like another cash in by Dr Palmer, and will give even less hope to young racers.
#12
Posted 12 September 2012 - 14:40
Edited by dank, 12 September 2012 - 14:40.
#13
Posted 12 September 2012 - 14:41
#14
Posted 12 September 2012 - 14:52
Seems to me it's actually an additional hurdle when getting out of karting.
#15
Posted 12 September 2012 - 15:01
Another nail in Formula Ford's coffin, methinks. Slicks-and-wings being more trendy, than learning the art of mechanical grip, of course.
racing winged cars aren't trendy, they are essential. F Ford is a redundant and pointless class for anyone with aspirations of F1
#16
Posted 12 September 2012 - 15:08
racing winged cars aren't trendy, they are essential. F Ford is a redundant and pointless class for anyone with aspirations of F1
Formula Ford is good for learning how to set up a car. There are no wings to distract you.
#17
Posted 12 September 2012 - 15:13
Probably not for long. Considering there are Superkarts maybe we should just turn the european championship into GP5 and keep the whole ladder strictly winged.Formula Ford is good for learning how to set up a car. There are no wings to distract you.
#18
Posted 12 September 2012 - 15:26
I also thought Formula 4 was an existing series?
I've only heard of (but not read) of Formula 4D.
#19
Posted 12 September 2012 - 16:06
racing winged cars aren't trendy, they are essential. F Ford is a redundant and pointless class for anyone with aspirations of F1
No. As has been mentioned previously, FFord is neither redundant nor pointless because it offers young drivers the only real opportunity in their careers to master the art of mechanical grip, which is of significant importance in the development of any driver with F1 ambitions.
With wings, drivers can easily become muddled when it comes to setting up their vehicles, failing to distinguish between the differences between aero and mechanical grip.
Not that any of this matters any more, as FFord looks likely to become a slicks-and-wings category next year in the pursuit of attracting drivers.
Edited by dank, 12 September 2012 - 16:06.
Advertisement
#20
Posted 12 September 2012 - 18:07
There has been a club scene F4 series in the UK for many years, promoted by the 750MC. It seems to be a catch-all series for redundant cars from single seater series that have been invented, promoted for a few years and then discarded for the next fad.I also thought Formula 4 was an existing series?
Cannot remember off hand the details but i think it is for sub-F3 type cars, e.g. FF2000, FF1600 with slicks etc.
No doubt cars from Mr Palmer's new category will end up there when it they outlive their usefullness.
#21
Posted 12 September 2012 - 18:12
Talking of which, it's quite sad really. While everyone suspected F2 would never be a valued series, it was still a shame that a series that tried to help out drivers who were struggling with the costs ended up ignored and full of mainly no hopes. Though GP2, which was designed to make money for a few mates of Bernie's with the extortionate parts costs, is heading the same way, just with wealthy no hopes that get TV coverage.
Edited by Fastcake, 12 September 2012 - 18:13.
#22
Posted 12 September 2012 - 18:43
#23
Posted 12 September 2012 - 18:52
#24
Posted 12 September 2012 - 22:01
Formula 4S
Formula 5
#25
Posted 12 September 2012 - 22:03
No. As has been mentioned previously, FFord is neither redundant nor pointless because it offers young drivers the only real opportunity in their careers to master the art of mechanical grip, which is of significant importance in the development of any driver with F1 ambitions.
With wings, drivers can easily become muddled when it comes to setting up their vehicles, failing to distinguish between the differences between aero and mechanical grip.
And fwiw, Formula Ford is the only junior single-seater category I'd actually turn up to watch, these days.
Not that any of this matters any more, as FFord looks likely to become a slicks-and-wings category next year in the pursuit of attracting drivers.
Just put your grievance over there, on top of the mountain of papers we call M. Todt's to-do pile.
Edited by Risil, 12 September 2012 - 22:06.
#26
Posted 12 September 2012 - 23:59
And as others have said, founding a new series as a solution to the current confusing mess of a career ladder seems rather counter-productive.
Watch F2 then, it's practically the same thing.Well Dr P and his MSV used to do the Formula Palmer Audi series, and I thought that was good. Indeed I believe it got reasonable coverage and attention. He makes a good effort at ensuring success. I miss FPA and hopefully this thing will make up for it. Hopefully there'll be prizes that include drives in higher formulae. Of the all the kart to single seater links, this looks the best on paper anyhow.
#27
Posted 13 September 2012 - 00:04
There has been a club scene F4 series in the UK for many years, promoted by the 750MC. It seems to be a catch-all series for redundant cars from single seater series that have been invented, promoted for a few years and then discarded for the next fad.
Cannot remember off hand the details but i think it is for sub-F3 type cars, e.g. FF2000, FF1600 with slicks etc.
No doubt cars from Mr Palmer's new category will end up there when it they outlive their usefullness.
Ah ok! Thanks. I did think I had read about it in the club racing pages of Autosport.
#28
Posted 22 October 2012 - 17:05
The website to me anyway is engaging and informative, I'm looking forward to seeing how this series goes on...
http://www.formula4.com/
#29
Posted 22 October 2012 - 17:22
#30
Posted 22 October 2012 - 19:14
#31
Posted 22 October 2012 - 20:13
What! Never knew Falco Wauer was racing as an american! Thought he was racing as a Norwegian. Weird.
Norwegian-American - I guess he's hoping there's more sponsorship for an American driver, than a Norwegian driver.
Also, Walkinshaw Racing!
#32
Posted 22 October 2012 - 21:12
Norwegian-American - I guess he's hoping there's more sponsorship for an American driver, than a Norwegian driver.
Kinda always understood when he was driving in Norway that he wasn't 100& Norwegian. Oh well, in Europe I don't think there are much difference if you are Norwegian or from the US
#33
Posted 23 October 2012 - 07:46
Formula 4
Formula 4S
Formula 5
And next, we'll have simply the New Formula.
#34
Posted 23 October 2012 - 08:32
#35
Posted 23 October 2012 - 08:35
... the best way to solve that problem?? ANOTHER CLASS lol
I don't really understand the argument of the ladder being confusing. For the fans, sure, but the drivers and insiders know very well how the series compare to each other. I fail to see how that stiffles the progress of the drivers.
#36
Posted 25 February 2013 - 19:01
#37
Posted 25 February 2013 - 20:07
http://www.formula4....ot-on-itv4.aspx
F4 on UK telly, good stuff. Looking forward to it.
How did they manage that?
Are ITV desperate for programming or something, broadcasting a bottom tier motorsport series that isn't attached to another seems very unusual. Suppose that may help a little to attract sponsors, it's hardly an easy thing at the moment.
Edited by Fastcake, 25 February 2013 - 20:08.
#38
Posted 25 February 2013 - 20:27
How did they manage that?
Are ITV desperate for programming or something, broadcasting a bottom tier motorsport series that isn't attached to another seems very unusual. Suppose that may help a little to attract sponsors, it's hardly an easy thing at the moment.
Jonathan Palmer's not averse to paying for airtime.
#39
Posted 25 February 2013 - 20:37
Advertisement
#40
Posted 25 February 2013 - 20:57
Jonathan Palmer's not averse to paying for airtime.
True, but you would of expected it to go to Motors TV or something.
#41
Posted 25 February 2013 - 21:10
#42
Posted 26 February 2013 - 00:56
True, but you would of expected it to go to Motors TV or something.
Palmer knows that BTCC is the biggest motorsport TV audience in the country after F1, and that as well as a low entry price, a highly visible TV package is just another carrot for drivers to come and race in F4.
I also think it's a bit of a message to SRO and their (mis)management of Brit F3... 'Look we got our series on the TOCA bill, perhaps we should run F3 as well?'
#43
Posted 26 February 2013 - 00:58
#44
Posted 26 February 2013 - 17:54
A bottom rung level on TV, with it's own show is a great prospect for new drivers and teams / managers, making a mark and attracting a bit of sponsorship becoming a real possibility.
It's good.
If I was breaking out of karting, it's where I'd want to go....
#45
Posted 26 February 2013 - 18:55
Why go to satellite when terrestial TV is willing?True, but you would of expected it to go to Motors TV or something.
#46
Posted 27 February 2013 - 00:36
Why go to satellite when terrestial TV is willing?
That's the point, it seems odd that ITV is willing to broadcast it.
#47
Posted 27 February 2013 - 00:55
That's the point, it seems odd that ITV is willing to broadcast it.
That would be assuming ITV are footing the costs. F4 could be doing the production in house?
#48
Posted 07 March 2013 - 00:55
Are ITV desperate for programming or something, broadcasting a bottom tier motorsport series that isn't attached to another seems very unusual.
On the face of it, it's not attached... but it's run by MSV, so linked to Superbikes.
#49
Posted 07 March 2013 - 14:36
On the face of it, it's not attached... but it's run by MSV, so linked to Superbikes.
MSV's a lot more than Superbikes.
It's nice to see that it's supporting DTM at Brands Hatch.
#50
Posted 07 March 2013 - 16:29
MSV's a lot more than Superbikes.
Indeed... but Superbikes is the other MSV series which is on ITV. And probably its most valuable property.