EXCITING 1.5l V6 turbos! Or lawnmowers?
#1
Posted 08 April 2013 - 18:56
Renault RS01
Williams Honda FW11
.. what a "lovely" sound that was?
..and the ultra "impressive":
Ferrari F1/87
Sorry if I'm not "excited" about next year's engine sound. I agree with Bernie.
Advertisement
#2
Posted 08 April 2013 - 19:06
#3
Posted 08 April 2013 - 19:07
#4
Posted 08 April 2013 - 19:13
http://forums.autosp...howtopic=179763
http://forums.autosp...howtopic=128393
http://forums.autosp...howtopic=175557
http://forums.autosp...howtopic=174959
#5
Posted 08 April 2013 - 19:22
The fans opinion on a tech regulation simply isn't a concern.
You could start a petition though! power to the people.
Edited by ApexMouse, 08 April 2013 - 19:22.
#6
Posted 08 April 2013 - 19:25
Who cares how they sound.
Errr........ seriously? Have you ever seen/heard a bone fide F1 car in the flesh?
The noise is, IMHO, one of if not the best things about seeing an F1 car scream past you.
#7
Posted 08 April 2013 - 19:29
Who cares how they sound.
If that's modern f1 fans for you, we're screwed!
#8
Posted 08 April 2013 - 19:32
And while next year's engines will be rev limited at 15.000 rpm, that's way higher than the circa 11.000 rpm of the mid-to-late-eighties turbo engines.
Could that be a reason why many journalists lost their initial skepticism once they actually heard these new engines?
#9
Posted 08 April 2013 - 19:39
New engines will rev to ~12k RPM, FIA limit doesn't matter.I can't remember anybody protesting these sounds in the eighties.
And while next year's engines will be rev limited at 15.000 rpm, that's way higher than the circa 11.000 rpm of the mid-to-late-eighties turbo engines.
Could that be a reason why many journalists lost their initial skepticism once they actually heard these new engines?
#10
Posted 08 April 2013 - 19:44
Sorry if I'm not "excited" about next year's engine sound. I agree with Bernie.
They sound great.
#11
Posted 08 April 2013 - 20:06
They sound great.
I don't think they sound better or worse. Just different. It will be a refreshing change.
#12
Posted 08 April 2013 - 20:09
They sound great.
Good enough for me. The current engines are too high pitched for my liking anyway, any change would be welcomed.
I expect this to get merged with one of the dozen other threads whining over the same thing.
#13
Posted 08 April 2013 - 20:10
I don't think they sound better or worse. Just different. It will be a refreshing change.
.....You have heard them?
#14
Posted 08 April 2013 - 20:16
Who cares how they sound.
Haven't been to a live race, I take it, then?
If that's modern f1 fans for you, we're screwed!
It's scary how we grow old so fast
#15
Posted 08 April 2013 - 20:36
Unlike the 1980s V6 turbos, the 2014 engine has a single exhaust outlet - higher pitch.
Think this: (2 mins onward) but greatly higher pitch.
V6s sound angry
#16
Posted 08 April 2013 - 20:46
Why not just post in one of the 2014 engine threads?
http://forums.autosp...howtopic=179763
http://forums.autosp...howtopic=128393
http://forums.autosp...howtopic=175557
http://forums.autosp...howtopic=174959
One more and each cylinder can have its own thread
#17
Posted 08 April 2013 - 20:58
[Sorry if I'm not "excited" about next year's engine sound. I agree with Bernie.
I like that better that the swarm of mad bees we have now. Your examples sound like actual race cars to me.
#18
Posted 08 April 2013 - 21:02
#19
Posted 08 April 2013 - 21:04
Why not just post in one of the 2014 engine threads?
http://forums.autosp...howtopic=179763
http://forums.autosp...howtopic=128393
http://forums.autosp...howtopic=175557
http://forums.autosp...howtopic=174959
rofllllll
Advertisement
#20
Posted 08 April 2013 - 21:10
#21
Posted 08 April 2013 - 21:16
Love the gearchangesThink this: (2 mins onward) but greatly higher pitch.
#22
Posted 08 April 2013 - 21:21
#23
Posted 08 April 2013 - 21:28
This all would have been interesting had they allowed the teams to turn up the boost pressure to the levels that were seen during qualifying in the 1980s.
Too bad...this was a perfect opportunity to see where engineering would have taken us 30 years later in terms of reliability. Instead they are running less power than they were in the mid-80s. Oh wait there's the whole KERS rubbish to make up the extra power.
#24
Posted 08 April 2013 - 21:32
Haven't been to a live race, I take it, then?
It's scary how we grow old so fast
I understand the sound of a modern F1 engine is part of the spectacle and it's a very special noise to many, but isn't this sport about the RACING?
Strange how all the elder fans complain about dulling the sound of the engines but then at the same time they harken for the days of Jim Clark and James Hunt when the engines surely didn't rev to 18k RPM.
It's racing. It comes down to the drivers and the competition. So what if the sound isn't as loud or as screaming as it used to be.
And no, haven't been to a race in-person. Guess that makes my opinions worth less than you god-sent beings who have heard "The Great Noise" and lived to tell the tale.
Gimme a break.
All the whining on these boards. Waah the racing is fixed with team orders, waaah Lewis is the best, waaah Fernando is better, waaah Vettel is a d-bag, waaah the engines aren't as loud as I want them... How about we wait to make a judgement on the engine noise until we hear a pack of cars together in race conditions?
/endrant
#25
Posted 08 April 2013 - 21:41
I'm pretty sure he has.....You have heard them?
#26
Posted 08 April 2013 - 21:49
I understand the sound of a modern F1 engine is part of the spectacle and it's a very special noise to many, but isn't this sport about the RACING?
Strange how all the elder fans complain about dulling the sound of the engines but then at the same time they harken for the days of Jim Clark and James Hunt when the engines surely didn't rev to 18k RPM.
It's racing. It comes down to the drivers and the competition. So what if the sound isn't as loud or as screaming as it used to be.
And no, haven't been to a race in-person. Guess that makes my opinions worth less than you god-sent beings who have heard "The Great Noise" and lived to tell the tale.
Gimme a break.
All the whining on these boards. Waah the racing is fixed with team orders, waaah Lewis is the best, waaah Fernando is better, waaah Vettel is a d-bag, waaah the engines aren't as loud as I want them... How about we wait to make a judgement on the engine noise until we hear a pack of cars together in race conditions?
/endrant
In a word, yes.
However loud you think they are multiple it by 10x and you might get close. Not to mention they sound so much more raw and aggressive in real life, on TV you just don't get the pop and bangs on the down shifts or on a mid corner lift as the engine dumps a wad of unburnt fuel into the exhaust. They are so much more ferocious than the TV portrays or even gets close to portraying. Oh and before i forget, the end of formation lap burn outs are orgasmic, frankly.
Trust me, when you hear them in real life you will appreciate just how important the sound is.
I regret never hearing the V10's in person, don't make the same mistake with the V8's, even you get half the chance i urge to go and see them in the flesh, its a completely different experience.
Here's a decent demonstration, albeit these are the EBD era cars, still doesn't get the whole sensation or the sheer volume of noise across.
Edited by olliek88, 08 April 2013 - 21:50.
#27
Posted 08 April 2013 - 21:53
In a word, yes.
However loud you think they are multiple it by 10x and you might get close. Not to mention they sound so much more raw and aggressive in real life, on TV you just don't get the pop and bangs on the down shifts or on a mid corner lift as the engine dumps a wad of unburnt fuel into the exhaust. They are so much more ferocious than the TV portrays or even gets close to portraying. Oh and before i forget, the end of formation lap burn outs are orgasmic, frankly.
Trust me, when you hear them in real life you will appreciate just how important the sound is.
I regret never hearing the V10's in person, don't make the same mistake with the V8's, even you get half the chance i urge to go and see them in the flesh, its a completely different experience.
Here's a decent demonstration, albeit these are the EBD era cars, still doesn't get the whole sensation or the sheer volume of noise across.
I can appreciate the sound and I guarantee I will understand your passionate position on the noise of F1 cars if I hear the engines in real-life, but the noise doesn't make the racing any better or worse and that's why I watch F1. I'm watching almost solely for the battles, the drivers, and the racing.
Different strokes for different folks I guess.
If Austin wasn't scheduled on top of the biggest karting event in the world, I'd definitely be there for that. But living the US makes it somewhat difficult to get to an F1 race.
Also, I don't care if the engines literally sound like a herd of flatulent cows, I'd rather have that than Bernie "artificially altering" the noise of the cars. We've got DRS and tires made of used chewing gum already, I don't need anymore artificiality in my racing.
Edited by tjkoyen, 08 April 2013 - 21:56.
#28
Posted 08 April 2013 - 22:05
And no, haven't been to a race in-person. Guess that makes my opinions worth less than you god-sent beings who have heard "The Great Noise" and lived to tell the tale.
Gimme a break.
Actually no, instead of being passive aggressive about it, then indulging in self pity, then jumping onto a high horse, you could have actually waited for a response to that question.
The response to that would be: I advise you to try and make it to a real race, because I never fully grasped the idea of just how magnificent an F1 motor sounds in person. The telly just does not do it any justice at all! Honestly, you just want to be there and listen to it all day long (and eventually lose your hearing ).
I was lucky enough to go to a few races in the V10 era (I also have been to races with V12 but I was too young to remember ), and even with the cheapest General Admission ticket, being there and listening to the audacious noise is something that I guarantee will change your view on whether sound is an important aspect of F1 or not.
I'm not a fan of NASCAR, at all, but it is one of the small goals in my life to go to a race at Indy or Daytona, because ovals are designed to just make those beastly cars sound even better!
Trust me, see if you can make the effort, it will be well worth your while.
#29
Posted 08 April 2013 - 22:14
And no, haven't been to a race in-person. Guess that makes my opinions worth less than you god-sent beings who have heard "The Great Noise" and lived to tell the tale.
Gimme a break.
/endrant
The noise of the cars is overwhelming (you can feel it as well as hear it) at the circuit. It's virtually impossible to sense the importance without having been to one.
Your rant carries little weight given your complete lack of experience. I witnessed the V10s at the height of their reign (2004). That was something spectacular.
#30
Posted 08 April 2013 - 22:21
I can appreciate the sound and I guarantee I will understand your passionate position on the noise of F1 cars if I hear the engines in real-life, but the noise doesn't make the racing any better or worse and that's why I watch F1. I'm watching almost solely for the battles, the drivers, and the racing.
Different strokes for different folks I guess.
If Austin wasn't scheduled on top of the biggest karting event in the world, I'd definitely be there for that. But living the US makes it somewhat difficult to get to an F1 race.
Also, I don't care if the engines literally sound like a herd of flatulent cows, I'd rather have that than Bernie "artificially altering" the noise of the cars. We've got DRS and tires made of used chewing gum already, I don't need anymore artificiality in my racing.
Incidentally, that is the perfect description of the first generation GP3 car!
#31
Posted 08 April 2013 - 22:23
I've watched handheld camera footage that seems to do a better job of capturing the differences in sound between the various engine manufacturers.
#32
Posted 08 April 2013 - 22:25
Williams Renault thunderclaps on upshifts in the 90's... Unbeatable. It's a pitty onboards miss that, you needed to be looking lined up the straight to get it.I witnessed the V10s at the height of their reign (2004). That was something spectacular.
#33
Posted 08 April 2013 - 22:57
I really don't care about the sound, I'll keep watching regardless. Yes, maybe the cars will sound worse or whatever, but it doesn't change F1 for me. I've only been watching for 10 years but so far despite the sport's best efforts, I still watch and enjoy. Even if the cars were silent I'd watch and enjoy.
#34
Posted 08 April 2013 - 23:35
Why not just post in one of the 2014 engine threads?
http://forums.autosp...howtopic=179763
http://forums.autosp...howtopic=128393
http://forums.autosp...howtopic=175557
http://forums.autosp...howtopic=174959
What he said.
Plus, that is 1980's technology.
Not best audio, but give the F1 engines another 200-300 horsepower and you'll have these.
#35
Posted 09 April 2013 - 00:08
How about waiting to see if it sounds bad? As stated the specs are different to 80s turbos and I have been to F1 races since the mid 80s when the trubos era was at its peak, they sound great live. If they sound half as good as 80s turbos I will be happy. There is at least a variation to the constant scream of the current high rev v8s.
#36
Posted 09 April 2013 - 00:32
I advise you to try and make it to a real race, because I never fully grasped the idea of just how magnificent an F1 motor sounds in person. The telly just does not do it any justice at all! Honestly, you just want to be there and listen to it all day long (and eventually lose your hearing ).
I was lucky enough to go to a few races in the V10 era (I also have been to races with V12 but I was too young to remember ), and even with the cheapest General Admission ticket, being there and listening to the audacious noise is something that I guarantee will change your view on whether sound is an important aspect of F1 or not.
Trust me, see if you can make the effort, it will be well worth your while.
Nothing beats and hearing these engines in person. The V10s in particular were simply intoxicating.
Edited by DILLIGAF, 09 April 2013 - 00:33.
#37
Posted 09 April 2013 - 00:47
Then complains about the sound?
Edited by Cacarella, 09 April 2013 - 00:48.
#38
Posted 09 April 2013 - 01:42
I like that better than the swarm of mad bees we have now. Your examples sound like actual race cars to me.
I would say mosquitos rather than bees.
This is what I hear when watching F1.
#39
Posted 09 April 2013 - 05:22
I would say mosquitos rather than bees.
This is what I hear when watching F1.
True.
FWIW I was at the track and heard V12s and the like in the 70ies, I was at the track and heard the turbos in the 80ies, I was at the track and heard the V10s in the nineties. They all had great sounds in their own ways. So will the next generation.
Advertisement
#40
Posted 09 April 2013 - 06:28
Exactly, the usual good sense from yourself.True.
FWIW I was at the track and heard V12s and the like in the 70ies, I was at the track and heard the turbos in the 80ies, I was at the track and heard the V10s in the nineties. They all had great sounds in their own ways. So will the next generation.
#41
Posted 09 April 2013 - 06:35
Renault RE60
Renault RS01
Williams Honda FW11
.. what a "lovely" sound that was?
..and the ultra "impressive":
Ferrari F1/87
Sorry if I'm not "excited" about next year's engine sound. I agree with Bernie.
Let it go, we all know your position on the matter, we've been reading the same thing from you for 6 months now.
ps that Williams sounds lovely.
Edited by chumma, 09 April 2013 - 06:36.
#42
Posted 09 April 2013 - 08:34
Williams Renault thunderclaps on upshifts in the 90's... Unbeatable. It's a pitty onboards miss that, you needed to be looking lined up the straight to get it.
The 2004 BAR Honda...the upshifts battered your chest whilst the extreme top-end scream burst your ear drums.
Was great
#43
Posted 09 April 2013 - 09:45
The fact is that V8s sound better to most people than V6s. 2.5L sounds better than 1.5L. 19,000rpm sounds better than 11,000rpm. Additionally, the job of a turbocharger is to take kinetic energy from the exhaust of an engine.
There's no way of getting around the fact that the new engines are going to sound a lot more like econoboxes than like exotic racing machinery.
If you like the sound of Ford Fiestas the same as the sound of Ford GTs then good for you. If you like the sound of Audi A1s the same as Audi R8s then good for you. But let's not kid ourselves. Most people will vastly prefer the sound of the old engines.
#44
Posted 09 April 2013 - 10:11
#45
Posted 09 April 2013 - 10:12
A lot of wishful thinking here.
The fact is that V8s sound better to most people than V6s. 2.5L sounds better than 1.5L. 19,000rpm sounds better than 11,000rpm. Additionally, the job of a turbocharger is to take kinetic energy from the exhaust of an engine.
There's no way of getting around the fact that the new engines are going to sound a lot more like econoboxes than like exotic racing machinery.
If you like the sound of Ford Fiestas the same as the sound of Ford GTs then good for you. If you like the sound of Audi A1s the same as Audi R8s then good for you. But let's not kid ourselves. Most people will vastly prefer the sound of the old engines.
Spot on!
Unfortunately with the cost of attending GP's and the changes in broadcasting , there are far more armchair fans now than in the past and if they haven't experienced their hair standing on end when a V12 Matra or similar goes by, they won't have the emotional response that some of us do... each to their own I suppose, but for me personally the sound is an important factor, I remember all the opinions when the Turbo's were banned and those in attendance welcomed the proper sound of a f1 race start rather than the buzzing turbos from previous years...
#46
Posted 09 April 2013 - 10:19
Think this: (2 mins onward) but greatly higher pitch.
V6s sound angry
This sound excellent.
#47
Posted 09 April 2013 - 10:59
One more and each cylinder can have its own thread
#48
Posted 09 April 2013 - 11:43
#49
Posted 09 April 2013 - 11:51
Reality check: Sound of an engine. Really not that important.
Try telling that to the circuit organisers if gate receipts fall.
#50
Posted 09 April 2013 - 11:52
What econobox have you seen that revs to 15,000rpm?There's no way of getting around the fact that the new engines are going to sound a lot more like econoboxes than like exotic racing machinery.