I know that Pascal Picci leaving Sauber could fit in the Alfa-thread, and that the (now stopped) sale of the team could fit in the Andretti-team thread.
However, I've never seen someone state so clearly that they decided to sell and leave the sport due to a specific happening, but reading Autosport's article on Pascal Picci here, I'm quite surprised on how openly Picci talks about things. His reason for leaving the team being "I do not want to be associated with the management of Fred Vasseur in the future", one of the reasons he mentioned was Alfa and driver choices. Almost feels like Picci didn't want Bottas in the end.
The more notable part of the article for me, is how, while there certainly seems to be more reasons for it, on of the main reasons that the Sauber-owners decided to sell and get out of F1 was the Belgian GP "race", which gave Williams lots of points. That it's still an "open wound" and led to them looking for a buyer.
I can't say I've ever seen this is motorsport, I know actions and/or lack of actions have consequences. I also know that teams like Manor went bust in large parts due to Sauber getting more points in wet and somewhat chaotic GP (slightly ironic). But I can't say I've seen a team/owners just deciding that something was too stupid/unprofessional, and due to that they are looking to sell and get out. Can't even say that I remember many drivers doing the same either. I guess F1 should be happy that the owners these days are more professional and more locked in than before. If this had been some of the 90's (or 80's) team owners, I wouldn't be surprised if the team had just disappeared.
I guess the reason for me making the new thread is that I am wondering if this has happened before? I'm sure it has and I don't remember something that I should remember, but has there been teams selling and getting out due to how the sport have been handled?