It would make a lot of sense given his oft-stated desire to support non-petroleum alternatives. Would be at least interesting to see how it went.
I have my doubts. In recent times he did show off racing with bio-engineered fuel.
As time goes on we all should have noticed, that electric cars have a lot of issues to be covered until they can be considered to have a long lasting positive effect on the environment. Some of the issues are the same as with the 'traditional' cars. Those issues I would argue probably never can be solved. And ironically E-cars have introduce new hazards, as any fire brigade can tell you. Simply because E-cars still burn even if you choked air completely from the flames. They need other much less environmental friendly materials to kill electrical fires. Especially cheap electric cars combust pretty easy. Lets not forget a completely full charged E-car has all the energy it requires inside the car, making fires much more dangerous than gasoline for anyone inside a car. If you thought what happened to Romain Grosjean was really scary then lets hope nothing similar happens to an E-car in a similar accident. The fireworks would be much, much worse is all I am saying.
If you don't know what I am talking about, look at the electric car industries outside of the Western World, specifically the track record on spontaneous fires. Or in some parts of the Western world have electrical brown outs now, because the electric consumption has sky rocketed. And E-cars are part of the issue. Electric grids are inadequate or simply have aged too much. What so called innovation does, is just shift problem to another issue. And if we want to know the hard truth, it seems driving any car less around is the only environmental sustainable way forward. So even for Sebastian Vettel, and other champs, the best would be not to drive a car when they don't need to. Harsh truth for all of us.
In a sense we need to remember that owning (buying) a car is a luxury. Interestingly without the emergence of E-cars, many younger people would not have bought any car at all, thus making our environment better. So the best what Sebastian Vettel or anyone could do is to find a better way for all of us to travel. I don't think that is possible due to physics 101. To move something, energy is needed. The only way to save energy is to make cars lighter. In racing that is done to make cars faster. For the rest of us, are we willing to sacrifice all the comfortable things, even safety?
A guy in Germany made an experiment with a gasoline driven car. He used ~ 20% of the gas the car uses in original configuration, by removing everything in the car that is not needed. The car was pretty scary to drive if it had crashed. No comfort and no safety around it. But it was fuel efficient.. There are trade-offs, no matter the engine a car uses and not just environmentally speaking. Comfort and safety come into play as well. And car makers love to sell us unnecessary gadgets. It's for your comfort and safety, and what not. Automatic gear-boxes, which are heavier and will always use more gasoline, etc.
In the end all I can say is we need to open our eyes and ears and make good informed choices and live with it. And let others make their own choices and accept them too. That even goes for the racing series one prefers.
It's not about any race driver making environment friendly statements. That simply is a PR gig. Not much else. No matter the drivers name. Hope we all can recognize that.
Edited by HP, 06 August 2023 - 23:20.