

Posted 12 February 2008 - 23:15
Posted 13 February 2008 - 10:07
Posted 13 February 2008 - 11:27
Advertisement
Posted 13 February 2008 - 12:18
Posted 13 February 2008 - 13:19
Posted 13 February 2008 - 13:22
Posted 13 February 2008 - 16:09
Posted 13 February 2008 - 16:16
Posted 13 February 2008 - 16:17
Posted 13 February 2008 - 18:33
Posted 13 February 2008 - 23:05
Posted 13 February 2008 - 23:58
Quote
I was thinking the very same thing David.Originally posted by David M. Kane
Is it me or does not that tub not look terribly rigid? Could that have played a roll in the aero issue? This is strictly a wild visual guess.
Posted 14 February 2008 - 07:46
Posted 14 February 2008 - 08:05
Posted 14 February 2008 - 08:46
Posted 14 February 2008 - 08:49
Posted 14 February 2008 - 08:58
Quote
Originally posted by Giraffe
I'm a bit lost here! In the beginning, there were two P68's and subsequently a P69.
John Surtees say's that the Irwin car is scrapped, so that leaves one of each. Then David Piper builds a recreation, that somewhere back in the thread is thought to have used parts of the scrapped Irwin car, so we are back to three.
Tom Wheatcroft then purportedly took delivery of two P68's; but if so, the Irwin car cannot have been scrapped, so we now have four, being the two original P68's the Piper recreation, and the P69.
Unless of course the two cars delivered to Wheatcroft were infact the remaining original P68, and the P69?
So we have the d'Ansembourg car that we think is original, and the Piper recreation' but what else is actually out there, and what of the P69???
Answers on a postcard please to the Giraffe home for the Terminally Bewildered....!![]()
Posted 14 February 2008 - 21:43
Posted 14 February 2008 - 22:52
Posted 14 February 2008 - 22:56
Posted 14 February 2008 - 23:11
Posted 14 February 2008 - 23:27
Posted 15 February 2008 - 01:57
Advertisement
Posted 15 February 2008 - 02:02
Posted 15 February 2008 - 02:31
Posted 15 February 2008 - 09:22
Posted 11 October 2008 - 12:37
Posted 06 August 2009 - 14:04
Edited by Giraffe, 06 August 2009 - 14:22.
Posted 06 August 2009 - 15:09
Posted 06 August 2009 - 15:25
Posted 06 August 2009 - 15:26
Edited by Giraffe, 06 August 2009 - 15:32.
Posted 06 August 2009 - 16:13
Posted 18 August 2009 - 07:11
Posted 18 August 2009 - 08:25
Alan Cox, on Aug 18 2009, 08:11, said:
That looks luvverly Alan - and so reasonably priced too...If you want something on your mantlepiece to remind you...
http://cgi.ebay.co.u...id=p3286.c0.m14
Edited by Kingsleyrob, 18 August 2009 - 08:26.
Posted 18 August 2009 - 09:37
Posted 18 August 2009 - 18:08
Posted 18 August 2009 - 19:33
Kingsleyrob, on Aug 18 2009, 09:25, said:
This contemporary Castrol advert, posted here earlier, shows the extended lower lip on the nose.What's the story behind the extended lower part of the nose? My recollection is that the initial one had the more delicate nose of the stripped P68 of d'Ansembourg we see pictured earlier.
Rob
Posted 20 August 2009 - 06:17
Robin Fairservice, on Aug 20 2009, 03:27, said:
Surely the car for which there were plans for Clark to race at the Brands BOAC 500 was the original 'P68' coupe - in 1968 - not the open and bi-winged P69... ? I think that picture must be from a year later.This is a picture that I took of the Ford P69 in the paddock at Brands Hatch in April 196. Graham Hill and Jim Clark were supposed to have driven it, but they went to a F2 race in Hockenheim and Jim didn't come back.
Edited by 2F-001, 20 August 2009 - 06:19.
Posted 20 August 2009 - 06:53
2F-001, on Aug 20 2009, 07:17, said:
Indeed, the P69 was developed from the 1968 P68 and its only appearance was in practice for the 1969 BOAC 500.Surely the car for which there were plans for Clark to race at the Brands BOAC 500 was the original 'P68' coupe - in 1968 - not the open and bi-winged P69... ? I think that picture must be from a year later.
Posted 20 August 2009 - 07:32
Edited by 2F-001, 20 August 2009 - 07:32.
Posted 20 August 2009 - 08:09
Robin Fairservice, on Aug 20 2009, 03:27, said:
This is a picture that I took of the Ford P69 in the paddock at Brands Hatch in April 196. Graham Hill and Jim Clark were supposed to have driven it, but they went to a F2 race in Hockenheim and Jim didn't come back.
Posted 20 August 2009 - 11:30
Pedro 917, on Aug 6 2009, 16:25, said:
The above car is the one that belonged to David Piper, the other car is still at Mecauto in Belgium where it's undergoing a complete restoration.
I recently received some pictures from Switzerland from someone who is building a replica, will look it up.
Edited by Giraffe, 20 August 2009 - 11:50.
Advertisement
Posted 20 August 2009 - 11:39
Giraffe, on Aug 20 2009, 12:30, said:
See post 25So how many cars do exist? There is the car that Ghys refers to above, which I presume is the d'Ansembourg car and there is the ex-Piper car seemingly declaring itself to be a P67 for reasons unknown. In addition there is the car that I saw in storage at the Skopos Museum in Batley that was most certainly not the Piper car, and not the Belgian car as that's been over there for some years. I remember the Skopos car as being very original.
The Piper car (P67) is of dubious heritage and quite heavily modified and the P69 seems to have dissapeared. Pictures of the crashed Irwin car gave me the impression that it was restorable, but considering so few of these cars were produced, it's amazing that no-one's kept tabs on yhem!