Quote
Originally posted by Italiano Tifoso
Well put!
Faultless comments on every front, i dont believe there is a Ferrari or McLaren supporter who can debate any of these points.
Actually yes.
Quote
No, Lewis is not undeserving, only not more deserving than Massa IMO. Massa won more races to start with. I know Spa was not really his but Lewis', but in turn Hungary and Singapore should have been Massa's. I think they have made about the same amount of costly mistakes and what made the difference was that engine blow in Hungary or that Singapore blunder by the team, as McLaren haven't commited such mistakes. Hamilton's car never once stopped because of a mechanical failure (actually never in his two years in F
Massa's mechanical failures have nothing to do with "deserved" wins. This is up to Ferrari to produce a reliable car. Kind of like what happened for Kimi. If he had a more reliable car in 2005, he would have easily won the WDC, but then, you have to remember that reliability, or the team's work is also a big factor in the WDC. This is what helped Michael win 5 in a row. Ferrari was untouchable at the dawn of the century (2000 to 2004) in terms of reliability/performance.
Massa didn't help himself in Australia/Malaysia and also at Monaco and Silverstone. He has made mistakes, as many as Hamilton. One can say Hamilton was lucky to have a reliable car, but one can say Massa was lucky to have FIA on his side (Spa, Fuji and some ridiculous McLaren penalties like in Malaysia or France).
Your post is good, very good, but there are some points open to discussion I guess...