I realise this might attract a lot of "non 56k modem user friendly" posts , but still....
To make a change from single-seaters, I modestly






Posted 16 November 2004 - 17:14
Advertisement
Posted 16 November 2004 - 19:21
Edited by Rob Ryder, 08 April 2019 - 11:24.
Posted 16 November 2004 - 20:16
Posted 17 November 2004 - 11:11
Originally posted by philippe7
Posted 17 November 2004 - 14:16
Originally posted by Buford
Well this is as personal a track photo as I can offer. Me in 1980.![]()
I can't believe I used to crawl into shitboxes like that!
Actually I guess that is a paddock and not track photo now that I think about it. I wish I had a scan of the flip - fireball photos. That was on the track!
Posted 17 November 2004 - 17:32
Posted 17 November 2004 - 18:22
Posted 17 November 2004 - 18:37
Originally posted by philippe7
Buford.....for us europeans who know nothing about oval dirt-tracks.....could you maybe elaborate a little about those very different looking ( in tread , and also apparently in size ? ) front tyres of yours ?
Thanks
Posted 17 November 2004 - 19:28
Posted 17 November 2004 - 20:26
Posted 17 November 2004 - 21:34
Posted 17 November 2004 - 21:41
Posted 17 November 2004 - 23:10
Posted 17 November 2004 - 23:23
Posted 18 November 2004 - 00:49
Posted 18 November 2004 - 01:27
Originally posted by Simpson RX1
Do you routinely walk around with a wheelbarrow to carry your balls in?
Posted 18 November 2004 - 07:40
Posted 18 November 2004 - 08:00
Posted 18 November 2004 - 13:56
Advertisement
Posted 18 November 2004 - 21:31
Posted 18 November 2004 - 21:36
Posted 18 November 2004 - 22:08
Hi BufordOriginally posted by Buford
If you have never done something like this you wouldn't understand.
Posted 18 November 2004 - 22:09
Posted 18 November 2004 - 22:15
Posted 18 November 2004 - 22:19
Posted 18 November 2004 - 22:26
Posted 18 November 2004 - 23:11
Originally posted by Twin Window
Hi Buford![]()
I'm not comparing oval racing to rallying as such, but your comment applies to the discipline neverthless...
![]()
Posted 19 November 2004 - 00:30
Posted 19 November 2004 - 00:46
Posted 19 November 2004 - 00:48
Posted 19 November 2004 - 01:21
Posted 19 November 2004 - 03:29
Posted 19 November 2004 - 08:28
Posted 19 November 2004 - 12:18
Posted 19 November 2004 - 13:33
Originally posted by Ray Bell
Importantly, the bridges are both gone. The river is still there, however... and the level crossing, the pub and the Viaduct.
...
Posted 19 November 2004 - 17:14
Posted 19 November 2004 - 18:24
Originally posted by Ruairidh
Ray - great photos - I have little knowledge of these tracks, the idea that the 60's greats ran 2.5litre cars on what look like country roads is amazing. Any more? Please!
Posted 19 November 2004 - 19:49
Posted 19 November 2004 - 19:56
Advertisement
Posted 20 November 2004 - 15:09
Posted 20 November 2004 - 22:21
Posted 21 November 2004 - 18:00
Posted 21 November 2004 - 18:15
Originally posted by WGD706
With the discussions about the FOM and copyright infringements in the RC section, ...
"The use of photographic equipment is allowed for private purposes only. ... As a condition of entry to the Event you assign (by way of present assignment of future copyright) the copyright in any photographs ...you make at the Event to Formula One Administration Limited ("FOA") and agree that any photographs...shall not be used...(except the private enjoyment of the person making the film) without FOA's prior written consent."
Are we walking on thin ice here or does our 'private enjoyment' and the sharing of same here mean we are within our legal rights to share these pictures?
Warren
Reading the very precise phrasing of FOM's email, I think they probably own the rights back to 1981. It specifically says "FIA Formula One World Championship™", which is the official name of the Championship after the 1980 season. Until 1980 it was the "World Championship for Drivers" (plus the manufacturers/constructors' titles, of course).
As a condition of entry to the Event you assign (by way of present assignment of future copyright) the copyright in any photographs...
Posted 21 November 2004 - 19:25
Posted 21 November 2004 - 19:36
Posted 21 November 2004 - 19:38
Originally posted by dolomite
Perhaps we should all send an invoice to the likes of Marlboro, Elf, JPS etc for the free advertising we are providing for them here?
Posted 21 November 2004 - 19:58
Posted 21 November 2004 - 21:36
Posted 21 November 2004 - 22:24
Posted 21 November 2004 - 23:44
Originally posted by Ray Bell
Ridiculous... you would think that the benefits to their sponsors would outweight whatever perceived advantage they receive from governing everyone's shutters. Not to mention the PR disadvantages...