Leaked (?) info about the 2017 nose:
http://www.f1analisi...me-sara-il.html
Posted 14 January 2017 - 08:40
Advertisement
Posted 14 January 2017 - 13:10
So same basic nose as in 2016 according to that source. I'd hoped the penis noses would disappear...Leaked (?) info about the 2017 nose:
http://www.f1analisi...me-sara-il.html
Posted 14 January 2017 - 14:04
So same basic nose as in 2016 according to that source. I'd hoped the penis noses would disappear...
Why is that a 'basic' nose?
Posted 14 January 2017 - 17:27
Basic in the sense of same base layout, was probably not worded very clearlyWhy is that a 'basic' nose?
Posted 14 January 2017 - 19:32
Basic in the sense of same base layout, was probably not worded very clearly
Aw, I just asked becase RB has a similar concept. If it's ok for them, I wouldn't worry about it. It is not what will define the 2017 car IMHO. I am not sure it is even a pic of the 2017 car, but who knows.
Posted 14 January 2017 - 21:48
Because it's an electron-pair donor?Why is that a 'basic' nose?
Posted 17 January 2017 - 10:16
Posted 17 January 2017 - 10:56
autosprint and those italian motor media are hilarious every year about their funny speculation attempts
quick searching:
2012
2015
Posted 17 January 2017 - 11:10
Posted 17 January 2017 - 13:30
What is hpc suspension?
Hydraulic Pitch Control
Posted 17 January 2017 - 14:40
What is hpc suspension?
That would be similar to that of RBR's suspension in 2016 as far as I reckon.
Posted 18 January 2017 - 16:30
According to F1AT Ferrari will keep push rod from 2016 and introduce some kind of "hydraulic suspension" to improve the car balance:
http://www.f1analisi...ospensione.html
Posted 18 January 2017 - 17:13
I do not have any faith in Ferrari developing a good downforce aero. Mercedes and Red Bull will eat them. The only hope I have for Ferrari is that due to increase in wing size maximum downforce will not be required for most tracks and they will be competitive with ok drag and good mechanical part which they can do. They were competitive in Japan and Belgium, tracks which required medium downforce.
Posted 19 January 2017 - 02:56
According to F1AT Ferrari will keep push rod from 2016 and introduce some kind of "hydraulic suspension" to improve the car balance:
about damn time........
Posted 19 January 2017 - 09:15
Hello,
I have split the above posts from the Scuderia Ferrari SF16-H Part III thread, as this is some info from the new car already.
When we have a model name for the car we will edit the thread title.
Posted 19 January 2017 - 09:46
Posted 19 January 2017 - 11:45
Piero Ferrari "would like at least 3 wins in 2017":
http://blog.quotidia...-piero-ferrari/
Posted 19 January 2017 - 11:59
Posted 19 January 2017 - 12:12
Isn't that what Ferrari letter prompts row over 2017 Formula 1 suspension designs is about?Hydraulic Pitch Control
Advertisement
Posted 19 January 2017 - 12:17
Aye, but this is Ferrari, and therefore it's okay...
More seriously, I think that using hydraulics in real time to control pitch is fine, but if you use it to store pressure or similar, that's a no-no.
Posted 22 January 2017 - 17:37
Third article from F1AT on the 2017 Ferrari (not very informative, mainly about the new rules and their presumed effects):
http://www.f1analisi...so-lungo-e.html
Posted 23 January 2017 - 00:19
Isn't that what Ferrari letter prompts row over 2017 Formula 1 suspension designs is about?
Yeah, I think they were clarifying if you can store the energy like Lotus says above before wasting any time going down that route.(Added bonus of forcing anyone else incorporating it to abandon that particular route)
They can still do what Merc are doing though and it looks like they will.
Posted 24 January 2017 - 20:56
Make Ferrari Fast Again...
Posted 25 January 2017 - 06:46
Make Ferrari Fast Again...
"But Mercedes is faster"
"that's an alternative fact"
Posted 25 January 2017 - 09:28
 
Marchionne wearing sweater even when meeting Trump, seems sweater is his formal suit haha
Posted 26 January 2017 - 16:58
allegedly there was a Santander tweet (obviously deleted since) which revealed the car's name: SF17-JB, in honour of Bianchi.
Posted 26 January 2017 - 17:10
allegedly there was a Santander tweet (obviously deleted since) which revealed the car's name: SF17-JB, in honour of Bianchi.
Yeah, I saw that. Would be a lovely gesture if true.
Edited by ConsiderAndGo, 26 January 2017 - 17:10.
Posted 26 January 2017 - 17:19
Make Ferrari Fast Again...
I will make Ferrari faster and I will make Mercedes to pay for the expenses.
Posted 26 January 2017 - 17:51
Posted 26 January 2017 - 18:39
This car better not have a pull-rod suspension.
Posted 26 January 2017 - 18:56
The PU is considered to be on par with the Merc one by the end of 2016 (on race mode at least). So what's the problem here? Ferrari ain't no longer daring to think about a car worth a WDC and aiming for something what we could possibly hear from a team like Williams or McLaren, especially considering that it's a reshuffle year.
Great.
Posted 26 January 2017 - 19:27
The PU is considered to be on par with the Merc one by the end of 2016 (on race mode at least). So what's the problem here? Ferrari ain't no longer daring to think about a car worth a WDC and aiming for something what we could possibly hear from a team like Williams or McLaren, especially considering that it's a reshuffle year.
Great.
#include <ferrari.h>
uint32_t currentYear = 2007; //Starting date
uint32_t thisIsOurYear = 0; //Next Ferrari world title date
while(true){ //Infinite loop
thisIsOurYear = currentYear + 1;
}
If for only 3 minutes they would be able to stop firing people and let the engineers do their job without fear to loose their jobs if they fail to perform then they would be dominating F1 again. For them the solution is always to restructure the team, fire people and hire some star engineer to fire him next season blaming him of everything. Marchione is a top businessman, but a F1 team don't work exactly in the same way as a corporation, and he still haven't understood that. The Italian press don't help either selling smoke every winter to then publicly hung them at the very first grand prix of the season.
Posted 26 January 2017 - 19:45
We were going way too fast! The name of the 2017 Ferrari car isn’t official yet. We're sorry, but we all have to wait for it.
Posted 26 January 2017 - 20:01
Posted 27 January 2017 - 09:00
SF17-JB
Santander F1 2017 - Jenson Button?
He is part of their marketing campaign afterall....
Posted 27 January 2017 - 09:28
Posted 28 January 2017 - 11:39
Ferrari passes crash test with "more extreme" nose than Haas:
http://it.motorsport...sh-test-869096/
Advertisement
Posted 28 January 2017 - 11:55
Posted 28 January 2017 - 11:55
Posted 28 January 2017 - 12:41
The PU is considered to be on par with the Merc one by the end of 2016 (on race mode at least). So what's the problem here? Ferrari ain't no longer daring to think about a car worth a WDC and aiming for something what we could possibly hear from a team like Williams or McLaren, especially considering that it's a reshuffle year.
Great.
Posted 28 January 2017 - 12:48
Well, the Merc PU did blowed up multiple times perhaps without running close to max output...Not even close. Our pu cant avoid blowing itself up if it runs close to max output.
Posted 28 January 2017 - 12:52
Why is trump talking to the owner of a foreign car company?
You mean Chrysler?
Posted 28 January 2017 - 13:14
Posted 28 January 2017 - 22:27
SF-17 Jim Bowen (Lets take a look at what you could have won!)
Posted 29 January 2017 - 07:39
Posted 29 January 2017 - 19:05
SF-17 Jim Bowen (Lets take a look at what you could have won!)
"You've won a speedboat!"
"I live in Milton Keynes"
Posted 29 January 2017 - 22:24
Posted 29 January 2017 - 23:58
I thought it was always a caravan.
The prizes on Bullseye or Ferrari's F1 car?